Comments: 123
Dylan613 [2021-11-15 18:00:16 +0000 UTC]
👍: 2 ⏩: 0
DaBair [2021-07-23 17:08:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TurningOverANewWord [2020-01-26 05:44:02 +0000 UTC]
It's because Toymakers are trying to please both the people who grew up with the 'giant lizard' dinosaurs that was popularized in Jurassic park and other older movies, and the demands of scientific community to have the stuff sold in museums and stuff be more up to modern standards of scientific accuracy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RobotNarkoman [2019-09-10 02:02:08 +0000 UTC]
Laughed my ass off XDDD this is pure genius!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ElfenFang [2019-05-20 17:54:51 +0000 UTC]
ok i wanted to make a raptor character/was looking at google for feather reference and came across this haha. this so funny but sad/true. xD
i think naked dinos or these at least look like a cool fictional creature but its still inaccurate yeah. ^^'
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MrProfGenius [2018-05-27 14:25:16 +0000 UTC]
Yeah it can't be helped Dinosaurs is a creature have similiarities with birds than reptile one. Agile movements, hot blooded, legs shaped especially for bipedal dinosaurs have much similiarities with birds than reptile, yeah we must accept the facts they are more like "Giant Emu". I also draw a Velociraptor based from this issue too : youtu.be/LqmcIvp6x1I
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Khandle [2018-03-08 11:21:05 +0000 UTC]
*sigh*
At least the people who draw them like this acknowledge feathers at all.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
fandomedragon25 [2018-01-29 03:10:23 +0000 UTC]
Uh how would it camouflage into its surroundings as a stealthy predator?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RaptorWings [2018-01-24 06:20:30 +0000 UTC]
oh gosh its dying
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tello640 [2017-12-30 01:00:54 +0000 UTC]
Man, now I feel like a idiot for drawing my raptor a head-crest...
I hope it's not too bad outside of that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wasichuwitko [2017-10-10 22:30:01 +0000 UTC]
The naked face would work for scavengers. Any other naked parts would depend on the species' environments and behavior.
Otherwise: study real birds for an idea of what to do with dinos.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Osmatar In reply to Wasichuwitko [2017-10-11 06:21:30 +0000 UTC]
There is actually very little evidence to suggest that naked faces are directly related to scavenging. Not all (or probably even most) avians with naked faces scavenge and not all scavenging birds have naked faces. What naked facial skin seem to be is a thermoregulatory adaptation for animals that have to deal with a wide temperature gradient, and in some cases display (though the former probably came before the latter).
I really shoud find the time to do a serious helpful version of this, covering every detail and possibility.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Wasichuwitko In reply to Osmatar [2017-10-14 00:51:50 +0000 UTC]
Given what scavengers often eat, naked faces could guard against disease caused by rotting bits and pieces caught in fur or feathers.
Too bad we can't know the feather distribution on the various species.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
RiceLemons [2017-09-11 22:56:42 +0000 UTC]
A scarlet-macaw rex?
:0
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ArtKitt-Creations [2017-09-11 20:30:35 +0000 UTC]
That's pretty sad and true lol. I play a game where all the raptors while feathered, have that unnatural wrist shape like you drew.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WhiteKitsuneKnight [2017-07-02 16:58:31 +0000 UTC]
This was actually pretty helpful! I'm designing a replica dinosaur and following the opposite of the advice given here has landed me a pretty cool looking dino!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LadyTroodon [2017-05-01 16:13:58 +0000 UTC]
Ugh...it's so hideous it's funny
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CelticQuailKnight [2017-04-05 16:57:31 +0000 UTC]
This actually made me laugh. And cry a lot inside, too, don't get me wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tarbano [2017-01-21 16:09:19 +0000 UTC]
Think I might know what started the mohawks gig. A popular arcade game called Primal Rage had dinosaur and dinosaur-like characters and one of them named "Talon" resembled a giant Deinonychus, granted what one was thought to look like at the time. It was the first time I recall seeing a dromaeosaurid given feathers and in this case, it was a mohawk.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Osmatar In reply to tarbano [2017-01-21 22:19:54 +0000 UTC]
I'm pretty sure they got it from an earlier source. There were certainly feather mohawks on deinonychosaurs already in the 1980s. The earliest one I can think of straight away is from G. S. Paul, but I used to draw one on my Deinonychuses in the 80s too, before I was even aware of Paul's work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ElSqiubbonator In reply to Osmatar [2017-07-21 05:03:51 +0000 UTC]
That brings up an interesting question: if Paul was in the habit of putting feathers on his raptors in the 80s, how come the raptors in Jurassic Park--which were based on Paul's sketches--don't have them?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Osmatar In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2017-07-21 10:22:10 +0000 UTC]
I've heard (and I'm not sure how reliable this info is) that Horner did try to promote feathers for the raptors, but either Spielberg or Stan Winston shot the idea down. I don't know the reasoning behind it, but since it was the early days of CGI it could be they were simply worried they'd not be able to do realistic feathers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ElSqiubbonator In reply to Osmatar [2017-07-21 16:04:55 +0000 UTC]
If that's the case, then why didn't they simply add feathers in the later movies when CGI was up to the task?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Osmatar In reply to ElSqiubbonator [2017-07-21 16:12:32 +0000 UTC]
I think that at that point the raptors had become iconic movie monsters, and they didn't want to fix something that was already working. It's not like they cared about the science anymore, at that point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tarbano In reply to Osmatar [2017-01-22 16:50:20 +0000 UTC]
Oh no doubt, Primal Rage is just the first instance I can remember it in popular culture which is why a lot of artists would use it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ForumFox [2016-12-13 16:15:54 +0000 UTC]
That sack holds the reproductive organs and is larger in females. It's kinda like today's birds. The female's hips are wider than the males
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Osmatar In reply to ForumFox [2016-12-24 21:15:03 +0000 UTC]
That was sarcasm, right? Please tell me that was sarcasm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ForumFox In reply to Osmatar [2016-12-28 16:43:29 +0000 UTC]
?? Um..No??
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PalaeoJoe In reply to ForumFox [2017-02-15 01:20:49 +0000 UTC]
Most of this diagram is sarcastic in the first place. Oamtar is being ironic for comedic effect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wyatt-Andrews-Art [2016-11-05 16:36:22 +0000 UTC]
That thing, a butthole sack or something
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tjlok [2016-07-13 21:31:42 +0000 UTC]
so true
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SonofThunderCatholic [2016-03-07 23:03:17 +0000 UTC]
Different dinosaurs had different coats of feathers (depending of the dinosaurs, it could even be completely scaly). Small dinosaurs surely had thicker coats on larger areas of the body than larger dinopsaurs (I mean, in hot climates).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PonchoFirewalker01 [2016-02-12 02:25:49 +0000 UTC]
The naked head could be an actual thing, considering the vulture, condor, and ostrich.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Osmatar In reply to PonchoFirewalker01 [2016-02-18 20:23:30 +0000 UTC]
A Naked leathery head, possibly. Naked and scaly, not likely. (Ostriches have quite fluffy heads, BTW, not that it matters.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>