HOME | DD

Our-Celestial-Death In reply to dratini12 [2016-02-09 03:25:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Our-Celestial-Death In reply to sansy-pansy [2016-02-08 23:21:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Our-Celestial-Death In reply to Music-Nerd-Cipher [2016-02-08 23:22:00 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Music-Nerd-Cipher In reply to Our-Celestial-Death [2016-02-09 08:06:00 +0000 UTC]

No prob bob

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

exxo-yawning In reply to Iggy-1-55-306 [2016-02-08 04:16:46 +0000 UTC]

wow like congratulations i honestly can't decide if you're a troll or just a massive douche

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ragamuffins2 In reply to Iggy-1-55-306 [2016-02-08 02:20:41 +0000 UTC]

There's a little thing called headcanons

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-Poison-Study In reply to Iggy-1-55-306 [2016-02-07 22:25:17 +0000 UTC]

Literally who gives a shit if there's "proof"? There's no proof that she's straight or bi or pan or ace. There's no proof that you're not an unfeeling slug monster who trolls through DA to leave stupid comments on people's harmless fan art and YET here we are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Iggy-1-55-306 In reply to The-Poison-Study [2016-02-07 22:33:10 +0000 UTC]

I just try to look at things realistically. Is there chemistry between Peridot and other female characters? Yes. Is there banter between Peridot and other female characters that could be seen as flirting? Also yes.
Rebecca Sugar has always been on top of telling us what's what about the gems, but she hasn't said a thing about Peri yet. I'm not trying to be a bad person, I just don't like when people jump the gun. I'm not saying Peri can't be homo or bi or pan. I'm saying that the beautiful creator of the show hasn't told us yet.

Sorry if I rustled your jimmies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

The-Poison-Study In reply to Iggy-1-55-306 [2016-02-07 22:47:59 +0000 UTC]

No, you said none of that actually. All you said was "no proof", which, you then discounted in your second comment by pointing out various instances of canon that can be interpreted to support the above fanart.

So, no, you aren't looking at things "realistically" you're holding a very specific, unnecessary form of confirmation as gospel in an attempt to make snarky and contrary comments on someone else's art. Then replying to a--clearly sarcastic--comment with some smug "rustled your jimmies" quip as if that would somehow undermine or dismiss my original comment.

You "don't like it when people jump the gun", and I don't like it when some psuedo-nice-guy tries to leverage his own special brand of defunct logic into a conversation to try and make himself look smart. So, no my "jimmies" are not "rustled", and your "logic" is flawed. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0