HOME | DD

poasterchild β€” Sink Big Coal!

Published: 2013-09-20 17:47:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 843; Favourites: 14; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description Please disseminate widely, thank you! This does not give permission to alter or claim credit for this re-mixed work, for which I retain all copyrights. The original illustration is in the public domain.

If you disagree with the views expressed here, please be sure to read my Policy Statement BEFORE you post: fav.me/d4tf3xs

The President has finally shown that he actually does have some guts and is taking on the coal companies and electric utilities by proposing rules (that do not have to be approved by Congress) that would force new coal-fired electricity stations to meet stringent limits on the amount of carbon dioxide they can pump into the atmosphere. This is a historic step, because it is the first time that there have been any limits whatsoever placed on the carbon pollution from power plants that accounts for about a third of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Although these rules will not apply to existing coal-fired power plants, over the long run, they too will have to comply because of market forces. Already, the coal-fired sector of the U.S. electric generation industry is under pressure from plants that use natural gas, which burns much more cleanly than does coal. Natural gas fired power stations will have no problems meeting the President's new standards, and this market reality, coupled with the pressure brought about by the new regulations to be issued by EPA next year, will go a long way to ending coal as a fuel for electricity generation in the United States.
Related content
Comments: 8

laserburn [2018-07-31 06:43:56 +0000 UTC]

Another trash talking lib. So what are you going to get harry potter to provide you with electricity?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheFlarbar [2015-04-27 16:42:33 +0000 UTC]

Why are we still using this crap in the 21st century?!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MrDSir [2013-09-21 00:43:52 +0000 UTC]

I'm happy to see regulations finally being put in place to control the externalized costs (i.e. citizens getting sick and dying from air pollution) but I hope this doesn't simply see the US trading coal for natural gas. Especially with fracking, it's no better and, in some cases, worse that coal. I wish our leader in chief would be pushing more for actual clean energy as opposed to more fracking and oil drilling.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poasterchild In reply to MrDSir [2013-09-21 01:16:10 +0000 UTC]

I couldn't agree with you more about renewables, especially renewable liquid fuels from biomass. Β Please see my long comment attached this this poaster for more details:Β fav.me/d53bf3f

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DRGW1015 [2013-09-20 20:37:19 +0000 UTC]

As someone who spent their childhood in West Virginia, I couldn't be more appreciative. What Big Coal has done to this beautiful state is heart-breaking. They completely turn their backs on their workers the millisecond the coal runs out, and leave the towns to go bust, and destroy mountain tops, spilling toxic waste into the drinking water. Yet almost nobody dares to challenge them because they have successfully pounded their corporate message into the voters, that any move towards economic diversity and away from coal (which employs less than 2% of the population) will cause the state to fall off the face of the Earth!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poasterchild In reply to DRGW1015 [2013-09-20 21:15:54 +0000 UTC]

Same thing here in southwestern Virginia, brother, with the coal companies aided and abetted by the Koch Brothers, America's Klimate Kriminals.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LanestraFlameheart [2013-09-20 18:09:02 +0000 UTC]

Bravo! FIRE!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

poasterchild In reply to LanestraFlameheart [2013-09-20 18:37:32 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0