Comments: 33
SpunkOnAStick [2007-02-09 16:55:43 +0000 UTC]
Still beautiful! Good on you to shoot in B&W.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SpunkOnAStick In reply to PrateekRajbhandari [2007-02-11 02:57:10 +0000 UTC]
Whatever works!
Sorry, old school - I shoot digital, but still shoot & develop my own B&W, so my first thought isn't conversion in PhotoShop!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ryuoroman [2007-01-22 20:03:56 +0000 UTC]
woah, Haunting!!
lovely dyanmic lighting, B and W really does a great job of enhancing the contrasts me thinks... also the "presentation" of the panaroma is really good.. two thumbs up dude!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PrateekRajbhandari In reply to drenchedinashes [2007-01-24 04:40:37 +0000 UTC]
Damn you. Too much chills isn't good for me. What if I fail to perform because I'm too "frigid"? hmm? hmm?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
drenchedinashes In reply to PrateekRajbhandari [2007-01-25 02:04:20 +0000 UTC]
fail to perform??
and you say you're not a whore because you're TIRED!!
LIESSSS!!!!!
ONCE A WHORE ALWAYS A WHORE.
whore.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
charke In reply to PrateekRajbhandari [2007-01-22 16:17:27 +0000 UTC]
yep it sure is long but i expect it does the job well....i tried it once..liked the results..im not sure if i got the entire action right tho.....im sure i made a mistake somwhere hehe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
charke In reply to PrateekRajbhandari [2007-01-22 16:16:22 +0000 UTC]
yep it sure is long but i expect it does the job well....i tried it once..liked the results..im not sure if i got the entire action right tho.....im sure i made a mistake somwhere hehe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PrateekRajbhandari In reply to charke [2007-01-24 04:41:50 +0000 UTC]
It's mainly for portraits where the most of the lighter tones are skin and bright fabric. Not mostly for landscapes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1