Comments: 19
ShadMotiRS [2022-09-13 02:05:42 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lucas-jorquera [2019-07-30 22:49:02 +0000 UTC]
I like it, I feel that more skeletons of this unique dinosaur are needed, but something is not clear to me why is the skeleton asymmetrical? on one side it has certain parts and on the other it doesn't
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Asuma17 [2016-02-28 20:16:55 +0000 UTC]
Man I never realized what big hands Citipati had.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EdaphosaurusPogonias [2013-10-11 18:33:39 +0000 UTC]
I hope this starts a paleoart trend of front on skeletals
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
raven-amos [2013-10-11 07:30:41 +0000 UTC]
THIS.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheMorlock [2013-10-11 03:32:56 +0000 UTC]
Interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sapiens89 [2011-10-19 14:33:48 +0000 UTC]
very nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
punisherfan1138 [2010-05-01 18:38:39 +0000 UTC]
"HE'S COMIN' RIGHT FOR US!!!"
Nice work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SteeleLord [2009-02-10 23:58:03 +0000 UTC]
awesome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Afrovenator [2009-01-21 16:07:49 +0000 UTC]
Cool and innovative!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qilong In reply to Afrovenator [2009-01-22 02:05:00 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Still needs cleanign up...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ashere [2009-01-18 17:59:49 +0000 UTC]
This is incredibly usefull, Jaime. Thanks a bunch for doing this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qilong In reply to Ashere [2009-01-18 20:57:17 +0000 UTC]
No worries. It still needs work, and most of the left side is mucked up, so it will be changed in the near future.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Piatnitskysaurus [2009-01-18 10:18:34 +0000 UTC]
I had no idea their binocular vision was so poor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qilong In reply to Piatnitskysaurus [2009-01-18 11:35:36 +0000 UTC]
Oh, yes. The orbits face almost completely sideways. The eye projects somewhat beyond the orbital rim, but this still gives no clue to the true ocular overlap. The animal may be like some birds and have the eye set out far enough to give it 360-degree vision, but with limited overlap (as in many birds, or rabbits).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Piatnitskysaurus In reply to Qilong [2009-01-19 10:31:00 +0000 UTC]
Still, I find its lack of binocular vision to mean that it obviously wasnt a hunting animal. Maybe it foraged etc, or browsed, but I cant imagine a predator having eyes like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qilong In reply to Piatnitskysaurus [2009-01-19 22:34:07 +0000 UTC]
These were likely non-predacious foragers, even if they ate eggs or clams or whatnot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1