HOME | DD

rae-of-light β€” Victorian Desires

Published: 2005-01-20 01:47:10 +0000 UTC; Views: 2639; Favourites: 32; Downloads: 20
Redirect to original
Description Well, I finished being lazy and picked up a pencil and drew something! I named it Victorian Desires because as you can see, it is a woman from the Victorian age (hint hint look at the dress) I spent most of my time on her hand and dress. I had fun doing this. It took me about an hour and a half to get this puppy done. But I was inspired by one of my romance novel covers heehee. I do not know why, but I absolutely adored this cover. It is from the book 'Suddenly You'. So I just HAD to draw it. I know half of her body isnt there, well because the other half wasnt there on the cover...I am thinking about using my "imagination" to complete the other half of her including a head, but probably another night lol! Umm...well, probably what I liked most about this is that most romance novels show cleavage and thighs...this shows the back with the corset half untied. I just found this extremely sexy! A few people have agreed with me, so I am not weird lol. But hope you like her, she was done in number two mechanical pencil and believe it or not kleenex for the shading I know, I am so resourceful....

Jeez..I wrote a novel here! lol

Enjoy

Oh and please comment/critique. I do not mind some tongue lashing here....I am strong...I can handle it!!
Related content

rae-of-light - Secret Admirer

rae-of-light - A Sorta Fairytale

rae-of-light - ARIEL

rae-of-light - The Price of Love 2

rae-of-light - My Munchkin

rae-of-light - Genie in a Gallery

rae-of-light - Meg

rae-of-light - The Price of Love

rae-of-light - Cranky Tinkerbell

kckat - travel attire

nissniss - Brigitte

Gaby-Aya - Celebrity

morosemocha - Wedding Gown

SavantsWrath - Elizabeth Bathory

LauraTolton - 1820s dress

ladylucrezia - Um...

Nemesis-of-the-Gods - Medieval-Wedding?-Dress

Upon-a-RemStar - Prom Dress
Comments: 43

arelia-dawn [2008-10-24 02:08:15 +0000 UTC]

This is very lovely--and I agree with the back thing. I mean, there's only so much cleavage and slutty stuff a person could take--but it looks better when its like...well, a back, I guess, thats exposed...ehh I'm rambling. Nice job =]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PippeDream [2008-03-09 05:57:30 +0000 UTC]

Lovelly job (:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

hael89 [2007-11-04 12:13:04 +0000 UTC]

no your not weird! LOL. I terribly love that book. I suppose you read kleypas? I enjoy her stories to say.

LOVELY! Üü β™₯

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to hael89 [2008-02-06 19:24:36 +0000 UTC]

Forgive me for my late reply! It has been eons since I have visited this site. Awhile back I had given up on it. But yes, I have read several of Kleypas' books. It has been a long time since I have picked up one but now that you mention her, I should!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Rowena-afar [2005-01-22 04:58:04 +0000 UTC]

wanna know a secret??? I have read that book....I like romance novels
your picture is so lovelyand expressive. you are so talented

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to Rowena-afar [2005-01-22 05:13:39 +0000 UTC]

Thank you soo much! And liking romance novels?! That is awesome! Shows you havea sensitive side which is GOOD. I loved that one mainly because it was so scandalous..hehe..and the heroine was so independent Power to women! haha Again thank you very much!
~Rae

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Rowena-afar In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-22 05:33:20 +0000 UTC]

I llke the ones with the strong and independent women....Amanda Quick, Norah Roberts,
Jayne Krentz to name a few. My friends tease me....I call it Women's fiction.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to Rowena-afar [2005-01-22 14:40:34 +0000 UTC]

LOL, I am a girl and I get teased! lol, but yes all three authors are excellent Women's Fiction, nice lol.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WoodieSka [2005-01-22 03:29:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh my goodness.

I want to draw that good!!!

I'm cold.


Yay. That was random.

But gooood job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to WoodieSka [2005-01-22 04:06:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you sooo much Alyssa, Amanda and/or Lauren!

I am cold too...brrr...


Rae!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ShortnSweetRH13 [2005-01-21 21:20:47 +0000 UTC]

Its so nice! I love it! I will have to read that book! But its lovley Rae. Defintly a !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to ShortnSweetRH13 [2005-01-21 22:59:55 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ShortnSweetRH13 In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-22 01:54:10 +0000 UTC]

Your welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ThomasBell [2005-01-21 13:54:15 +0000 UTC]

Woah Rae! some of these people are really harsh witht heir commnets!
Once again i love it! probably one of my favourite pieces of yours!
only little bit of critisism is maybe next time you might want to use more of a lighter tone than dark? lol well dont listen to me. what do i know!
fantastic Rae keep it up!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to ThomasBell [2005-01-21 20:10:24 +0000 UTC]

thanks Tom
Yeah, they may seem harsh, but I was talking to Munki and we have been talking for a bit and I know her. How she acts, etc. I know she didnt mean any harshness! lol.
Why wouldnt I take advice? Doesn' t hurt. The worst that could happen is that I would suddenly lose my eraser and not be able to erase it! lol
But thank you very much again

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Egg1687 [2005-01-20 02:45:13 +0000 UTC]

Munki's right about the tissue... don't be afraid to get dirty... you CAN wash it off...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to Egg1687 [2005-01-20 02:47:05 +0000 UTC]

You cannot take water to the paper sweetheart...she means for shadows...lol. I use it to blend my shadows...which is a bad habit that I must get rid of! BUt yes, that is what she means. I can stand dirtying my hands thank you very much...lmao...you make me laugh!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Egg1687 In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-24 21:40:12 +0000 UTC]

i ment you can wash your hands, not the paper... and i disagree with the you can stand to get dirty bit....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to Egg1687 [2005-01-25 21:38:09 +0000 UTC]

I can too! :sulks in corner: okay yes, I do sometimes have issues getting my hands dirty! But I was able to do it with Victorian Desires 2 so take that!
Heehee, just playing...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Egg1687 In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-25 22:10:49 +0000 UTC]

mmhm, sure you were... you said you blended with an eraser...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to Egg1687 [2005-01-26 22:04:12 +0000 UTC]

and my finger....gosh darn you! Stop confusing me...you are mentally abusing me again! **runs in to a corner and sobs**

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Egg1687 In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-27 03:46:02 +0000 UTC]

no i'm not, , sorry i confused you, i'm confused too actually.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to Egg1687 [2005-01-27 21:23:59 +0000 UTC]

haha,

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Egg1687 In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-27 22:39:10 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Egg1687 [2005-01-20 02:37:09 +0000 UTC]

love that book

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to Egg1687 [2005-01-20 02:41:20 +0000 UTC]

heehee, knew you would like it. I KNOW these things...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 3

Egg1687 In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-24 21:48:37 +0000 UTC]

lol, kinda scarry how well we know each other sometimes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

rae-of-light In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-20 02:45:35 +0000 UTC]

No Jason, a trashy raunchy romance novel.....just kidding, it is a clean romance novel, thank you very much. No Da Vinci included in it whatsoever. Just about LOVE! heehee oh and desire...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bronzey214 In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-20 02:44:07 +0000 UTC]

Which book? Da Vinci Code? :eyes narrow:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Egg1687 In reply to bronzey214 [2005-01-24 21:46:36 +0000 UTC]

sure you were joking wrong window my arse. I do not have your book!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bronzey214 In reply to Egg1687 [2005-01-25 23:56:32 +0000 UTC]

Actually, yeah I was. You'd notice that that particular deviation had no relevance to Da Vinci Code, but her journal did and I commented the wrong thing. And I could care less if you have my book or not, I have more important things in my life than you, sorry to disappoint you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Egg1687 In reply to bronzey214 [2005-01-26 00:37:55 +0000 UTC]

Yet you still take the time to talk to me and agrivate the hell out of me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bronzey214 In reply to Egg1687 [2005-01-26 00:58:08 +0000 UTC]

You're the one that lets it bother you and doesn't think we can salvage anything.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Egg1687 In reply to bronzey214 [2005-01-26 20:42:06 +0000 UTC]

thank you for the pageview comment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

bronzey214 In reply to Egg1687 [2005-01-26 20:58:05 +0000 UTC]

mmhmm... What was with the "Go see if Jocelyn is okay, it looks like she had a bad day" comment at lunch?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Egg1687 In reply to bronzey214 [2005-01-27 03:44:29 +0000 UTC]

she didn't come to physics and i saw her in the hall before lunch, she looked like she had been crying. you say your her friend, so does that make any sence?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bronzey214 In reply to bronzey214 [2005-01-26 01:14:17 +0000 UTC]

Btw.
Egg1687 is a Deviant of Many Talents
is Female
is a deviant since Apr 13, 2004, 3:49 PM
has 900 pageviews
is located in United States
is idle
is currently
is an AIM user; Egg1687

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bronzey214 In reply to bronzey214 [2005-01-20 02:45:04 +0000 UTC]

Wrong deviantArt window... o.O Sorry about that. And I was joking anyway.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

StephZag [2005-01-20 02:32:27 +0000 UTC]

you have a very cartoony style ie.. very dark outlines... myabe you could practice softer outlines for a guide and creating shape thru shadows?

nontheless, great job, your eye for proportion has shone thru again.

oh and STOP USING THE BLOODY TISSUE! practice using your pencil for shading... you get more control and dont go "oh shit" then you realise that youve smudged bits you wanted white... you also have more control of darkness

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to StephZag [2005-01-20 02:40:30 +0000 UTC]

heehee, thanks! I will part with the bloody tissue, haha. Not that I liked using it anyways...never knew what else to use...a pencil eraser WOULD work...lol. Ahh well...enough of me blabbing, we talked about this on AIM! Anyways, glad you like her.
~Rae

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

StephZag In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-20 02:47:04 +0000 UTC]

no smudging!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

rae-of-light In reply to StephZag [2005-01-20 02:48:31 +0000 UTC]

that I totally agree....lol....:efficiently erases smudges:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

StephZag In reply to rae-of-light [2005-01-20 02:50:31 +0000 UTC]

hehe...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0