HOME | DD
RizkiusMaulanae β Popular 'Giant' Theropods except with L.africana
#carcharodontosaurus #elephant #giganotosaurus #loxodonta #size #spinosaurus #trex #tyrannosaurus #mapusaurus #sizechart #africanbushelephant #africanelephant #sizecomparison #theropod #theropoddinosaurs #theropoddinosaur
Published: 2018-11-12 12:13:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 22502; Favourites: 136; Downloads: 41
Redirect to original
Description
Who doesn't know this chart? vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/de⦠Its one of the most shared dinosaur related size chart alongside a similar looking chart with Tyrannosaurus rex specimens (the one with that single toe material fanboys have been jacking off to. Grrrrrrr). The lastest revise was literally 5 years ago, so a newer version has to be done.Dissclaimer : I do not own the skeleal references I used. They are owned by and respectively. some scalings made by are also used.
Related content
Comments: 27
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
Is it true that Mucpv 95 is unreliable for isometric scaling? That's what I've heard from Franoys and Scott Hartman.
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
i like how the elephant is still the biggest.
if the grey individual actually was 10+ tonnes
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, but it's the largest specimen ever measured, which means it was far from average. T.rex and Giganotosaurus are still easily bigger than the vast majority of adult African Bush Elephants.
π: 0 β©: 1
I was the one who made that original chart way back, I honestly thought I had deleted it everywhere I had uploaded it (since it contained a lot of errors and the skeletals weren't credited to their authors at all) but it keeps popping up on other hosts uploaded by other people. I don't exactly what the Tyrannosaurus chart you are referring to is but I have a feeling a may also be behind that one...
Needless to say this is a _lot_ better.
π: 0 β©: 1
I think many people saved the chart before you took it down.
cdn.discordapp.com/attachments⦠this is the rex chart I was talking about.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah that ones on me too, I now think all my scaling in it is off (except when it came directly from Hartman's skeletals of course).
π: 0 β©: 0
Iβm a bit skeptical on MUCPv 95 but overall itβs accurate
π: 0 β©: 1
Well its a dentary that is just 2% larger linearly. Dinosaurs with a lot of preserved specimens shows variations so it could just be the same size as the holotype, smaller, or 2% bigger. Who knows tbh.
I wasn't going to add it at first but I prefer to not getting assaulted by Giga fanboys.
π: 0 β©: 1
Another estimate put it at 13.23 meters and 8616 kg, but according to Franoys the dentary doesn't scale isometrically from the holotype.
π: 0 β©: 0
An elephant would put up a good fight against the theropods, IMO.
π: 0 β©: 1
Palaeoloxodon namadicus would probably not have much trouble defeating any of these theropods (in a 1x1 fight). Imagine what they would be able to do with those tusks... Think about the massive males in musth, attacking anyone who gets too close and competing to assert dominance. That must have been a fearsome animal.
π: 0 β©: 0
I wish there were more individuals of these, one specimen can alter the maximum size of an entire species (just look at Mapusaurus). Maybe a lot of the other Theropods don't live to be as old as Tyrannosaurus?
π: 0 β©: 1
T. rex itself had a βlive fast die youngβ mentality to life, so that would be hard.
π: 0 β©: 0
Not so "Jumbo" now, are they?
Anyways, awesome!
π: 0 β©: 1
Rofl
Thank you
π: 0 β©: 1
You're welcome!
π: 0 β©: 0
I too heighted 50 kg
π: 0 β©: 0
The weight of MUCPv-95 actually should be 7300 kg scaling form the holotype.
π: 0 β©: 1
Its just a 10 kilograms differences on a 12 and a half meters animal
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't think it would be hard to fix it though
π: 0 β©: 0
The previous version came from 2013. I don't blame it for being outdated but people keep thinking its still good nowdays so yeah.
π: 0 β©: 0