Comments: 14
Gwangelinhael [2012-10-23 03:19:16 +0000 UTC]
great mood
i like it
π: 0 β©: 0
rocqua In reply to NonIntentonal [2008-11-24 17:59:07 +0000 UTC]
thanks.
it does give that sense of depth, which is why i chose to.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dramaqueen-1 [2008-11-05 07:38:41 +0000 UTC]
Likes this alot.. could be a better title tho, more.. metaphorical or symbolic or whatevers.
But it's a very strong shot.
π: 0 β©: 1
rocqua In reply to Dramaqueen-1 [2008-11-05 14:48:53 +0000 UTC]
i kinda prefer the more descriptive title, as my favorite picture of all time is called the tettons and the snake river, which may sound very deep, but actualy it's a photo of a mountainrange called the tetons, and a river called the snake river.
thanks, there are some more comming up, i can't believe i once said i didn't like B&W.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dramaqueen-1 In reply to rocqua [2008-11-06 14:15:19 +0000 UTC]
Well you didn't like my B&W, that's something different than ALL B&W.
And your own (edited) work always seems to look very nice (in general). Compared to what it used to be.
π: 0 β©: 1
rocqua In reply to Dramaqueen-1 [2008-11-06 17:25:15 +0000 UTC]
well i do vaugely remember saying it, but whatever.
what exactly do you mean by the second sentence? do you mean that work looks better after you edited it? do you mean that i improved?
π: 0 β©: 1
Dramaqueen-1 In reply to rocqua [2008-11-06 18:27:27 +0000 UTC]
awright.
Ik bedoelde dat je eigen werk er altijd beter uitziet nadat je het hebt bewerkt omdat het anders is dan de originele foto, maar dat nog niet direct betekend dat het ook beter/goed is.
π: 0 β©: 1
rocqua In reply to Dramaqueen-1 [2008-11-06 18:58:18 +0000 UTC]
ah, ik snap wat je bedoelt.
π: 0 β©: 0
rocqua In reply to lieziej [2008-11-04 21:12:43 +0000 UTC]
die maakt wel een bocht, maar die was niet te zien.
je bent vwo met 0,5 T dus dit moet je begrijpen.
π: 0 β©: 0