Comments: 62
rhubears [2017-04-15 23:49:07 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Commenter
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane In reply to rhubears [2017-04-16 20:37:52 +0000 UTC]
You and me both, buddy…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
spyed [2015-05-13 00:58:44 +0000 UTC]
awesome feedback!
lots of cool updates coming for this system... we've learned a TON from the first go-around, I think you'll be very pleased..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hoi-me-mus [2014-10-30 22:38:34 +0000 UTC]
Agree
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rice-chex [2014-10-27 03:47:26 +0000 UTC]
This is excellent! Great mock-up, it seems way more efficient. Although, maybe this isn't the best place to ask but, what is the difference between collections and favorites? On the feed I thought that collections replaced favorites?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rice-chex In reply to rotane [2014-10-28 00:35:29 +0000 UTC]
OHHHHHH Oh oh oho. I didn't realize they were called collections. That clears so much up, thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AquaAurion [2014-10-25 13:16:44 +0000 UTC]
This would be so much better! I sincerely hope the dA-staff takes a look at it and consider making these changes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Astrikos [2014-10-25 03:26:40 +0000 UTC]
This is a very nice suggestion. The details you mention are very nicely illustrated and I hope these changes are implemented!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vexnir In reply to rotane [2014-10-30 12:45:11 +0000 UTC]
That would be amazing. Your ideas are great, keep up the good work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane In reply to vexnir [2014-10-31 13:08:04 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Unfortunately, real life has taken over for now, so i currently don't have the time to work on another mockup…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ebonsong [2014-10-24 23:51:58 +0000 UTC]
I greatly dislike the activity widget but your suggestion makes this manageable. I may not use it, but still nice to know this could be an option.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dediggefedde [2014-10-24 22:34:16 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for featuring me^^
The design looks neat and I guess a lot of these things could be done by userscript/-style but as his feature is pretty new and will be probably get changed in more than its css-class-names, working on that is risky at best.^^
I also don't use the activity-feed. Sometimes I feel like posting what I am working on, but after posting I always feel like shouting my name in an empty room... I kind of want to say something relevant when I post something... that's also why I always uncheck "friends" and check "scraps" when watching someone... I care about what is posted individually. Reading an infinite page of things some random people said in chronological order somehow doesn't interest me...
So... While this would be a neat design, I still wouldn't use this feature.^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane In reply to Dediggefedde [2014-10-25 08:32:58 +0000 UTC]
Things probably could be tweaked with CSS to look similar to this, but the whole widget can't be moved into a separate page without at least some javascript tinkering. And even then some of the features i'd like still wouldn't work, i guess. But you're right, things will definitely change, this was pretty much confirmed by the staff.
Yes, the Feed has greater, more fundamental problems than how it looks that also need to be tackled. But if it at least looks nice, maybe a few people are more inclined to use it even in its current form.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ooupoutto [2014-10-24 12:53:42 +0000 UTC]
I like the idea of less comments and more art. From your model, I think it makes the art more clear. Definitely would be nice to see some of it implemented!
I don't know though, this new update is just the worst and anything is better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane In reply to Ooupoutto [2014-10-24 13:02:10 +0000 UTC]
To be honest, i didn't see the need for this at first either. But now that i've used the new features for a while, i can definitely see their appeal – first and foremost the new Today page. The Watch Feed to a lesser degree. But don't forget, no-one is forcing you to use these new pages; you can still use your Message Centre and Browse page, just like before.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BunniiOrbit [2014-10-24 12:31:13 +0000 UTC]
You put all the things I wanted into an actual mockup. Thank you ,__, you're awesome
I hope they listen to you!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tayleaf [2014-10-24 10:36:47 +0000 UTC]
This is perfect, it fixes EVERYTHING!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane In reply to tayleaf [2014-10-24 10:45:38 +0000 UTC]
I'm still not truly happy with it, but it's a start. Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheRyanFord In reply to rotane [2014-10-26 00:20:26 +0000 UTC]
I agree with this "Ryan Ford" person's opinion in full.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rotane In reply to zilla774 [2014-10-24 09:51:50 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for taking the time to respond and take this into consideration! Let me then just reply real quick on some of the things:
- Lack of comments. To me this is twofold. One, It's a matter of size, and having a couple of comments always sit there just takes up too much space in the long run. Two, they're a distraction from the actual content. Sure, they suggest "community interaction", but they are of little actual value. And if i care enough for comments, i wanna read more than just the 2, so i'll check out the page.
- Merge with Journals page. This would make sense if it were just Status posts and Journals, otherwise it's just the Feed in its current form. Unless said "Communication Center" had a little sub-nav for all the different types to view separately, or something like that. Hmmm, yeah, i do like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rotane In reply to GinkgoWerkstatt [2014-10-24 07:23:50 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. There could still be a widget for your main profile page, but it would have to be greatly reduced in size – like a "mini-feed". I'll probably make another mockup, if i find some time…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GinkgoWerkstatt In reply to rotane [2014-10-24 07:39:36 +0000 UTC]
Something like the twitter widget. Already suggested it, so hopefully we will get something like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Krazzulimaii [2014-10-24 04:31:02 +0000 UTC]
Completely agree with everything here. Good on the dA staff for mentioning this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Basement-Aviator [2014-10-24 04:04:25 +0000 UTC]
This is what they should've made it like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pharan [2014-10-24 04:04:13 +0000 UTC]
THANK YOU.
Everything is too wide right now on a desktop screen.
It really annoyed me that all their screenshots of the layout were of tiny screens, as if everyone browsed dA on tiny iPads and things. Just zero acknowledgement that all sorts of people use 1920x1080 screens.
The elements look horrendous stretching out horizontally on not-at-all-unusually-sized screens. And much worse on those ultrawides some artists use.
I'd go farther to say the max width should be even narrower. like around the 700's or something. I know tumblr has it a bit above 500, which looks great but I don't know if it would fit dA.
If the narrower width isn't a default, it should at least be an option, like the Cozy, Compact options for Google's stuff.
For the same reason, pushing the top nav buttons to the left makes sense. They're SO FAR APART on a desktop screen. It's ridiculous. It's like Windows 8 all over again.
The white areas next to deviations are also butt-ugly.
I like your recommendation here, and in general regarding color.
I think white isn't necessarily against the dA look, but those white bars and random white areas everywhere are just weird.
The single-row collection updates look much better than the weirdly aligned stuff (again with the white bars) dA currently has. Apart from not being relevant to me, the other reason why I stopped following everyone's collections was that it was an eyesore on the feed.
Your deviation mockup doesn't account for people who don't describe their artwork much though. I follow a bunch of people who just put one sentence, or a dot, as their dA description. Maybe attribution info.
I still kinda feel that the layout should be able to center the thumbnail. And be able to accommodate both tall and wide deviation thumbs reasonably.
Still, your stuff looks good.
Overall, love this mockup. Everything looks clean and readable. I wish dA would use it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane In reply to Pharan [2014-10-24 10:44:42 +0000 UTC]
Wow, what a wall of text, but you bring up a ton of good points! Cheers!
- Max-width: This is true, 900px might still be too wide, even 800 might. But the font-size is slightly larger than what we're used to, so it's not as glaring. But still, i do agree. 500px, however, might look too weird on dA. I might try again with something in-between, possibly around 750…
- Funny that you brought up Windows 8. That's one of the largest (pun intended) issues i have with it, when they stretch these previously tiny windowed apps (like Skype) into a blown up fullscreen app. Just horrible. Not to mention the extreme "flat" approach.
- Other than comment boxes, there is literally no white on dA. Unless you want to count sta.sh. About a year ago or so spyed mentioned in a journal, that there are 3 colour schemes: green/grey for the community part (deviantART), white/blue for deviation management (sta.sh), and orange for professionals (DreamUp, or what it's called). So i think it's important to stick to your guns.
- Submitted deviations: True again. I'm not quite happy with that myself, but i didn't want to further wreck my brain last night, when i finished this. Maybe another time.
From a look at the other comments, it seems at least some of the features suggested here are in discussion internally already. Fingers crossed!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SNMGems [2014-10-24 03:42:41 +0000 UTC]
This is exactly what I want to see!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheTwinny [2014-10-24 02:30:08 +0000 UTC]
This is what the new feed should've looked like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Krazzulimaii In reply to TheTwinny [2014-10-24 04:31:18 +0000 UTC]
the da staff is looking into it, from what I can tell.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>