Comments: 99
Russian-Fox In reply to ??? [2016-10-24 02:38:32 +0000 UTC]
Indeed. A bomber that could double as a fighter would have been exactly what the Japanese needed late in the war.
But like many things in World War II, it was too little, too late.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ComannderrX [2014-07-05 02:41:13 +0000 UTC]
oh this thing, i remeber it as a summonable assist fighter from strikers 1945 for the playstation
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-07-06 00:19:05 +0000 UTC]
The real machine is quite potent.
Its a torpedo bomber, but its actually more agile than the legendary Zero. Just as fast too. Plus, it has armour, self sealing fuel tanks and other defensive measures.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ComannderrX In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-07-06 03:59:02 +0000 UTC]
more agile than the zero? but its a torpedo bomber, thats impossible!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-07-07 20:28:07 +0000 UTC]
Its not impossible.
When the Ryusei had fired its torpedo or dropped its bombs (it could be a torpedo bomber or dive bomber), it was more agile than the Zero. It was blessed with good aerodyanmics and a strong, powerful engine. This engine was of a new generation of Japanese engines that could handle heavy weight with ease, it generated 1,995 horsepower, double that of the engines Japan started the war with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-07-11 01:33:35 +0000 UTC]
It was.
Only about 100 were built though. The factories building them were hammered relentlessly by the U.S. Army and Navy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ComannderrX In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-07-11 05:05:35 +0000 UTC]
thats a shame. it is a nice ooking plane, how many are left?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-07-12 20:44:50 +0000 UTC]
One.
Its currently in pieces and in bad need of restoration. It sits in storage at a facility owned by the Smithsonian in Maryland.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ComannderrX In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-07-12 21:12:45 +0000 UTC]
just like the Badass Gotha Go 229 Nazi stelth flying wing jet(i think thats what its called) and the almighty J7W shinden
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to ComannderrX [2014-07-13 19:11:22 +0000 UTC]
The Go229 is being restored. Look in my gallery, you'll see a picture of her wings in the restoration hanger.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ComannderrX In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-07-13 21:50:24 +0000 UTC]
could you link me to it? i cant find it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tora044 [2014-02-10 00:36:11 +0000 UTC]
haha I wanted this plane so much in the game Aces High, I was a extreme nuisance in my slow but highly agile B5N. Though with no forward guns I just got to annoy the hell out of fighters trying to shoot me down, on top of giving my squadronmate who dared join me as a rear gunner, motion sickness. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Tora044 [2014-02-10 21:13:42 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. Just imagine having forward firing 20mm cannons
and more agility than a Zero. X3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tora044 In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-02-11 00:59:57 +0000 UTC]
Though if I'm not mistaken I think the Ryusei uses the same powerplant as the N1K2, so not sure how maneuverable it would be.
But yes I remember a 30 minute dogfight I had with a Hellcat with my B5N, I ended up ramming his tail (thus telling him who rammed him) but I only ended up damaging my engine. Then finally both of us parted ways. He messaged me saying he had to keep telling himself, "No forward guns... no forward guns..." since I was on his tail so much. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Tora044 [2014-02-11 02:41:26 +0000 UTC]
They do.
But its been confirmed the Ryusei can indeed outmaneuver the Zero...
Good thing for us they didn't enter service in large numbers.
XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tora044 In reply to Russian-Fox [2014-02-11 07:31:25 +0000 UTC]
Oh now that would be fun as hell.
I remember using a D3A with it's twin peashooters... I mean twin 7.7mm MGs as a fighter. They were particularly effective against Zeros and Spitfires, and squadronmates who joined as a rear gunner didn't get motion sickness as much as they did in the B5N. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Tora044 [2014-02-11 18:24:47 +0000 UTC]
It would.
Plus, the Ryusei had armour and other defensive measures, thus, if your opponents could
hit you, you wouldn't go down easy.
Yeah, they're rather light. But since its a bomber, its not as important.
Most often, the targets of those guns will be enemy infantry or AA gunners in the open.
And Spitfires should be able to take hits from light guns like those. Dunno what the game
developers were thinking when they coded it. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deamand [2013-10-26 04:08:37 +0000 UTC]
looks good needs a little weathering though good job on the build.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Deamand [2013-10-27 01:22:43 +0000 UTC]
Yeah. Weathering is something I'm still figuring out.
In any case, weathering on a Ryusei would be light, given how little service they saw.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deamand In reply to Russian-Fox [2013-10-27 12:41:02 +0000 UTC]
weathering is pretty fun even myself im pretty new at weathering but it is amazing just how more real you can make them look.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Deamand [2013-10-27 21:24:29 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I know. I've seen what weathering can do. I just need to hone my current skills,
while picking up new ones. Right now, I'm transitioning from "rattle cans" of spray paint
to an airbrush, so that is the skill that gets my attention for now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deamand In reply to Russian-Fox [2013-10-28 06:05:37 +0000 UTC]
oh you will love having an airbrush and there are all kinds of modeling videos and alot of them on youtube where people show how to use one different techniques patterns you name it. 20 years ago when i got my first airbrush i never looked back.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Deamand [2013-10-28 23:25:14 +0000 UTC]
From what I've done so far, I already like airbrushing. And I just have
a $10 cheap-o from Harbor Freight Tools. I can only imagine what a quality
one will do for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deamand In reply to Russian-Fox [2013-10-29 23:10:53 +0000 UTC]
I have a pashe H model air brush and a much older badger 150 dual action my pashe single action is more user friendly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Deamand [2013-10-30 00:32:53 +0000 UTC]
I need something that allows for quick colour changes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deamand In reply to Russian-Fox [2013-10-30 05:55:21 +0000 UTC]
the pashe is easy you get done with one color fill the cup with thinner spray it out cleans and your ready for the next color.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Deamand [2013-10-30 17:06:07 +0000 UTC]
Ah. Gravity feed I take it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deamand In reply to Russian-Fox [2013-10-31 04:12:31 +0000 UTC]
sometimes too certaim colors like steel,alumium,silver or chrome sliver or any type of metalic color tends to hand around so cleaning them out takes a little longer but most regular colors clean out pretty quickly but gravity feed brushes they are fairly easy to clean and maintain and most little air compressor's last for years i have had my little badger compressor for about 12 year's.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to Deamand [2013-11-01 01:38:09 +0000 UTC]
Metallic colours in general can be rather "fussy". Even with the
old rattle cans, I've had trouble with them.
As for a compressor...I'm set. I have a 33 gallon compressor for
running various air tools. I can adjust the pressure from pretty much
1 PSI to 150, so I can tone things down for any work I might want to do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deamand In reply to Russian-Fox [2013-11-02 11:37:55 +0000 UTC]
yea that ought to work just fine.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RUSBERKUT [2012-03-03 14:48:26 +0000 UTC]
It looks as a nice bomber!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to RUSBERKUT [2012-03-03 21:45:33 +0000 UTC]
Indeed, it does look fairly nice.
I wanted to configure it as a torpedo plane, but I used its torpedo on a model of a Kate.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RUSBERKUT In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-03-04 03:35:39 +0000 UTC]
I see real russian way of thinking
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TomCatDriver [2012-03-03 04:05:08 +0000 UTC]
many other torpedo planes as well under development by other nations,but cancelled{example-the Fairey Spearfish,among many others!}.....it was found that the classic torpedo attack was just unsafe to attempt,level bombing or dive bombing proved more feasible.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to TomCatDriver [2012-03-03 04:15:40 +0000 UTC]
Of course.
And some torpedo planes made it into service, but became strike craft of other types. The AM Mauler for example. It could carry three torpedoes, but the Navy abandoned torpedo bombing and the Mauler spent its short career hauling bombs and rockets.
The legendary Avenger also gave up the torpedo role and instead picked up a radar set, making it an early AWACS style aircraft as well as taking on the ASW role.
None of them could dogfight though, and that's what really made the Ryusei stand out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TomCatDriver In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-03-10 15:18:19 +0000 UTC]
good thing they never got enough of them to make a difference!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to TomCatDriver [2012-03-10 22:13:58 +0000 UTC]
No joke. I'd hate to imagine what they could have done at say, Midway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TomCatDriver In reply to Russian-Fox [2012-03-12 18:14:33 +0000 UTC]
the IJN were certainly no slouches,on the sea or in the air!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Russian-Fox In reply to TomCatDriver [2012-03-13 02:07:35 +0000 UTC]
Even if their first aircraft were rather fragile, if you took them lightly, you WOULD get your ass handed to you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>