HOME | DD
sacking-jimmy — Mille
Published: 2005-05-05 20:31:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 1522; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 66
Redirect to original
Description
Just playing around with corel painter. I don't use it enough. I need criticism. I'd like to improve. Tell me what I need to fix.Related content
Comments: 26
In my personal opinion this work is ok,
you got a style of yourself,and that is the important thing...
I think you must go for this way that you have explored.
This is the only way to achieve the artistic perfection
searched by the natural artist inside all of us...
Congratulations, You have a great work! keep it up!..
please visit my gallery to continue trading comments...
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
good work! 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Her face is a little cocked to the right, it just needs to be evened out a bit. That's all I see. Wonderful job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Horrorpops? I absolutely love this work. I would hang it on my wall if I could!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I would try lightening up on the opacity or decreasing the "well" in the variant editor for the brush you are using, it makes colors blend well. other than that the structure is solid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It looks a little blurry?
I'm not one to criticize, but that's just something I noticed.
Other than that it looks kickass!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah it's not as good as it could be but it's pretty old and one of my first attempts into digital painting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The perspective is kinda screwy on her face. Its kind of odd to look at because of that and especially with the eye patch. The painting style itself is good though, simple yet effective.
(More people need to do constructive criticism on dA...its not mean, its helpful to improve your art!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
oh man, I had no idea this was yours, it's been in my favs for sooo bloody long lol... awesoem work man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Haha funny how that works out. Looking back I've come a long way from this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
um...criticisms...
more eyelash detail? i don't know. i love it. i love them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Her eye makeup was really heavy. But looking back your right I probably should have defined it alittle bette.r
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ok, but i still think it's very good. (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wow, that's stunning!! I find nothing wrong to say either.
just a question tho, did you use a ref for that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks! And yeah I did use a reference photo for it. it just makes things so much easier.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nope. nothin wrong.. you rock at digital painting <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeah you know... there's nothing really wrong that i can point out. i like it all. alot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanky. This is the one I was telling you about. Now it's done and time to move onto something new.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
...wow. I wish I could offer criticism, but this is so awesome, I can't find a single thing to criticize... sorry 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well thanks. It's just something new I hadn't tried before. Glad you liked it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0