HOME | DD

EllieG18 In reply to DrHockeyandstuff [2017-08-04 14:11:55 +0000 UTC]

Why mention that under an artist's work? This isn't a DN fansite, it's a DA's comment section, under their work, on their page. The intention of DA is for us to compliment or give constructive critcism to artists, unlike Youtube, etc. Btw the author of the manga describes L as extremely arrogant and slightly evil, so you may as well as hate both of them if you hate "dicks."

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThatTiccingF-edFreak In reply to DrHockeyandstuff [2016-12-19 15:07:47 +0000 UTC]

I see, Join the party. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mateuscristian In reply to DrHockeyandstuff [2016-03-06 15:53:51 +0000 UTC]

Welcome to "Fuck you Light" club.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-04 14:12:45 +0000 UTC]

You're too whack to have enemies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-04 15:47:12 +0000 UTC]

That's a really old comment.
Although I agree with what I said, I wouldn't put it that way now.

If anyone is crazy, it's the people agreeing with a mass-murderer who basically turned the world into North Korea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-05 15:14:47 +0000 UTC]

You should look up what whack means, because it doesn't mean crazy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-05 16:05:45 +0000 UTC]

You should learn that words can have several different meanings...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-05 18:03:45 +0000 UTC]

Whack has one meaning in this context. When someone calls you whack there is only one meaning. That's for you to learn.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-05 20:40:31 +0000 UTC]

If it means the even more insulting thing, you'll have to be sent off to Aperture Science.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-05 23:49:52 +0000 UTC]

To be as clear as possible, I called you "whack," with the meaning of being lame and ridiculous. In the content I was referring to you not worth being deemed an enemy of Kira fans because your original comment (the one I replied to), was so immature I can not see someone who isn't whack holding such beliefs for a fictional character and story. You can love this work and love L and analyze and appreciate everything about DN without raging verbal war. That's literally the crap you said in your OG post. If you're ten or younger, I apologize for calling you whack.

Now you should be able to understand the difference between "whack" and "wacko." Once again, I never called you crazy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-06 07:09:34 +0000 UTC]

That's the one thing you cannot grasp, that someone could have any true feelings related to "fictional characters", or that someone would care about morals when experiencing a "fictional work".
Do you even care when people are killed in anime, or do you not feel empathy for anyone you consider "fictional"...?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-06 21:12:36 +0000 UTC]

I do care if it's a good story and/or I liked the character. I was saddened by Light's death, and you were saddened by L's. That's all fine and dandy and completely irrelevant. You just have an image of me you've created yourself that I couldn't care less about. I love how a day later you still haven't answered 80% of my questions but feel like arguing about everything DN related. This is ridiculous. This is WHACK.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-07 07:54:39 +0000 UTC]

It's not that I didn't answer. It's that you didn't accept what I said as a reason, because you still don't care at all about what he did.
You only care about why he did it, and it's like you think that makes it less of an evil thing.

You are expecting me to ignore what he did, and "respect" why he did it. You are the one not making any sense.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-07 13:30:07 +0000 UTC]

I don't care about what you respect is why you're mistaken. I've just explained why everything about your argument is wrong. And you still haven't answered my questionS like I said. "S," it's a plural word. You've answered about two so far. You should answer all of them if you're confident in your argument. You're just rambling about your beliefs about what makes a person good and why you've decided I don't know how to read fiction, etc. You're saying a lot of nothing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-07 13:54:57 +0000 UTC]

Those are just your interpretations of what I said.
You are the one forcing your "one true way" of experiencing stories, where you have to analyze everything.
Because I don't do it that way, you think I am only focusing on one aspect, and looking at everything "as literally as possible" but that's not true.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-07 15:02:30 +0000 UTC]

Good for you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-07 15:32:26 +0000 UTC]

I am just stating what you did.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-05 23:46:08 +0000 UTC]

Care to explain why you believe that? Probably not but here's your chance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-06 07:11:24 +0000 UTC]

Just look up the word "whack" on Urban Dictionary, and you'll see the first few definitions, and why I think that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-06 21:10:48 +0000 UTC]

Since this needs to be spelled it for you, STILL... Go by the second definition on UD. It's also in the normal, traditional, literary dictionaries such as Meriam & Oxford

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-07 07:25:11 +0000 UTC]

Why are you acting like anyone should have known what you meant from the start, when that word has multiple definitions...?
It doesn't work that way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-07 13:23:12 +0000 UTC]

It does work that way. I don't know what the hell your first language is but we're speaking English, so you need to catch up and keep up. When words have multiple definitions, it's a reader's responsibility to evaluate the context of the word to understand its meaning. To be called "whack," has one meaning and one meaning only. Language goes beyond definitions. As in beyond the alphabet and vowels. Get yourself a tutor.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-07 14:25:01 +0000 UTC]

You don't understand the basic concept of languages.
If a word has several definitions, not every use of the word can be determined by the context.
I understand this better than you do.
"To be called 'whack,' has one meaning and one meaning only" is just completely incorrect.
The reason why Urban Dictionary is better than Merriam-Webster in this case is because the second doesn't even have the adjective definition listed.
I bet you didn't even look it up there, and just decided that the meaning you have learned is the only one, even though that's clearly not the case.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-07 14:36:22 +0000 UTC]

I'm going to disregard the first thing you said and try to treat you with more respect than you treat me. You're assumption I didn't read through the UD definitions is buck wild, because yesterday I told you to go by the second definition on UD. You're unbelievable. Truly special.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tasorius2 In reply to EllieG18 [2017-08-07 14:51:52 +0000 UTC]

If you did read through them, why did you act like there is "only one" definition and that I am stupid for not "knowing" that...?
You're the one who is unbelievable... I tried to get rid of you, because I didn't want to be repeatedly told that everything I believe in is insane and stupid, and that the way I experience stories is wrong and that your way is the only way.
I deleted some of your messages without reading them, because I didn't want to be attacked like this, but I still had five new messages telling me how wrong I am about everything and how I am stupid for even wanting to exist.
You just never stop and you don't seem to have any concept of empathy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EllieG18 In reply to Tasorius2 [2017-08-07 15:07:00 +0000 UTC]

"But I still have five new messages telling me how wrong and stupid I am for wanting to exist." You need a doctor asap. I'm not joking. I strongly recommend you getting help. You pick fights and then get emotional by the response. If you truly believe I have attacked you, you're just not on the level I thought I was speaking to. That may be no fault of your own so you should go relax.

I'm just glad I now know why you're so repetitive. You delete my responses as a way of cowardly backing away from my logical answers. I would never delete your messages as we were having a conversation and I would never be able to understand the context without your words being visible and understood. Only a certain type of person would do that. If you are only deleting my messages I have no idea why you're still responding.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1