Comments: 23
ssubramani01 [2019-03-19 06:47:34 +0000 UTC]
Highly Targeted Audience On Facebook Without Wasting Your Time 100% FREE An Meet Social Media’s New Unfair Advantage.. get Money-Back Guarantee businesscashtricks.blogspot.co…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rito00 [2011-10-10 20:16:35 +0000 UTC]
nice !!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nickbyrnedesign [2011-08-19 13:14:55 +0000 UTC]
Nice type and deign, ace!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
graffyty [2011-04-01 16:51:16 +0000 UTC]
Great typeface selection (Bebas ftw!). Really like the retro colours and texture too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fitzfitzpatrick [2011-01-26 05:56:59 +0000 UTC]
Really good dude! The type is nicely layed out, nice muted colours and good use of texture and shape. Great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mariotullece [2011-01-19 14:27:30 +0000 UTC]
really nice job, i liked the colors, good use of textures and nice typo too (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
alesfuck [2011-01-19 12:58:23 +0000 UTC]
awesome piece mate
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shteuf [2011-01-19 12:09:03 +0000 UTC]
Amazing piece of design ! Is it possible to get any infos about the typefaces used in this poster ? These are great !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SkipDesign In reply to Shteuf [2011-01-19 12:59:36 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I've used Bebas Neue, Shakula and Aller in order of main focuses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shteuf In reply to SkipDesign [2011-01-20 21:24:42 +0000 UTC]
Nice set ! Bebas is awesome and free (which is rare), Aller is far better than Myriad pro in my opinion, and shakula seems like ChunkFive. Great layout anyway !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RichardTheRough [2011-01-19 09:19:58 +0000 UTC]
Good typography.
Helvetica condensed bold, chunk five (not sure) , and the body text on the right seems an Helv. but it's not.
Good colours and texture as well.
Nice poster, well done mate!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
SkipDesign In reply to RichardTheRough [2011-01-19 12:58:25 +0000 UTC]
Thanks.
You're wrong about typefaces. These are Bebas Neue, Shakula and Aller in order of main focuses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RichardTheRough In reply to SkipDesign [2011-01-19 15:17:06 +0000 UTC]
Bebas!!!
It's one of my favourite fonts but I haven't recognized it!
Shakula I don't know it, Aller I got it.
Good selection, next time I will be focused to recognize better them.
Well done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shteuf In reply to RichardTheRough [2011-01-19 12:09:55 +0000 UTC]
Yeah it seems like chunk five but it's not (look at the "y"). Types used are so fitting together !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RichardTheRough In reply to Shteuf [2011-01-19 15:16:14 +0000 UTC]
Yeah right! It's really similar to the C-5.
Thanks 4 info.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cranenoir [2011-01-19 08:18:47 +0000 UTC]
nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
schledde [2011-01-19 07:44:42 +0000 UTC]
its amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0