HOME | DD

Sphenacodon — Bird-of-paradise dragon

Published: 2008-04-04 07:36:13 +0000 UTC; Views: 4499; Favourites: 63; Downloads: 176
Redirect to original
Description Flower dragons are the eternally-overlooked cousins of the European and Asian dragons. They cannot breathe fire, most of them cannot fly, and they do not use semi-naked princesses as bait for knights. And yet, they include some of the weirdest of all beasts among their ranks.

The study of flower dragons - anthodracology - is still in its infancy, but already it has shed light on much of the flower dragons' habits. Flower dragons, or anthodracids, are an extreme example of evolutionary convergence. Each species has developed a close similarity to a particular flower. Usually, the head is like the flower, while the rest of the body may have fleshy leaf-like protrusions to further the camouflage effect (those leaf-like structures became wings in the most derived species). Flower dragons range in size from tiny forget-me-not dragons to hulking saguaro dragons, but all of them are flower mimics.

Why do flower dragons do this? Analysis of stomach contents has finally put this to rest: they are specialized predators of flower fairies. By mimicking the flowers that fairies pose on, they can come close to them and successfully gobble them up in a lightning-fast strike.

This species is a bird-of-paradise dragon Strelitziadraca notoafricana, a smallish flower dragon from South Africa that specializes in bird-of-paradise fairies. Its primitive "wings" are incapable of flight, and are instead used for display and camouflage.

[Note: this pic represents what's possibly my most ambitious photomanip to date, combining a painting with photos. Let me know if I got it right, and what I can correct].
Related content
Comments: 42

MEGslayer [2013-10-01 02:40:57 +0000 UTC]

why did you stop doing these?! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MakaioMikaele [2012-07-23 20:35:27 +0000 UTC]

That is awesome! A flower dragon! Keep up the awesome artwork!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to MakaioMikaele [2012-07-26 11:17:23 +0000 UTC]

Why thank you very much! I hope to do more in this vein.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MakaioMikaele In reply to Sphenacodon [2012-07-26 17:20:07 +0000 UTC]

your very welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IanMelbourne93 [2009-08-08 06:02:41 +0000 UTC]

great concept, i love it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to IanMelbourne93 [2009-08-11 06:32:21 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

magpiesmiscellany [2009-02-27 02:28:08 +0000 UTC]

Really cute, and I like your description. I'm not good with manips, so no ideas there for you. Drawing-wise, I'd say maybe a bit more shading at the edge of the far wing and back might make it blend in tonally with the background photo. I like the idea of this guy. I hope you do a series.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to magpiesmiscellany [2009-03-31 08:36:38 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the feedback! I'm not good at manips either, by my own reckoning...

I'd love to make more. Actually, I did start a saguaro dragon, but never got around to finishing it. I also had ideas for rafflesia, pitcher-plant, lily-of-the-valley, foxglove, nasturtium, and edelweiss dragons... but not the time to do them...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

magpiesmiscellany In reply to Sphenacodon [2009-04-04 22:04:07 +0000 UTC]

You're going to have to eventually. Think of the card sets you could sell

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to magpiesmiscellany [2009-04-05 17:26:01 +0000 UTC]

Now there's a thought...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

magpiesmiscellany In reply to Sphenacodon [2009-04-06 01:53:45 +0000 UTC]

I can think of several people who'd buy sets. Thoughts for next holiday season

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

blicks23 [2008-11-03 18:47:04 +0000 UTC]

It's amazing, but you can shade between the toes and legs to make it look more 3D!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to blicks23 [2008-11-04 07:55:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!
I'm still getting used to combining photoshop and traditional art. I agree, the feet look flat compared to the rest of the animal. Something for next time, then...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

blicks23 In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-11-04 15:49:47 +0000 UTC]

Walaw!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to blicks23 [2008-11-05 06:35:54 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ray72285 [2008-04-10 21:31:52 +0000 UTC]

Just sending you a congratulations for being featured in this week's issue of The Dragons of deviantART - [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to ray72285 [2008-04-11 07:17:39 +0000 UTC]

Wow, thanks so much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ray72285 In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-18 22:42:48 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Michelle56 [2008-04-08 02:52:07 +0000 UTC]

NICEEE!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to Michelle56 [2008-04-08 06:36:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomastapir [2008-04-04 18:53:23 +0000 UTC]

Very pretty, and I LOVE the conceptual background! The head and "wings" are my favorite parts. I think the integration into the photo works fairly well in terms of the sense of how the mass of the animal is situated on the branch or beam; that shadow beneath the creature is very successful. The background landscape slightly out of focus also really helps. My only suggestion might be to take a look at the disparity in value between the creature and the background, and perhaps punch up the shadows on the underside of the volumes of the creature's body turned away from the light to give further dimensionality to the creature's forms. On the other hand, the creature has a really nice luminosity to it, and I wouldn't want to see you sacrifice that. Perhaps the background could be lightened instead? Anyway, these are all secondary issues...it's a beautiful piece overall!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-05 07:08:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the feedback! I did feel that the animal was very bright as compared to its background, but I uploaded it anyway to get some critiques.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-06 06:15:44 +0000 UTC]

The funny thing is, the longer I looked at it the more natural it seemed...I actually had second thoughts about my comment after I posted, thinking I was being too hasty, but if you had the same impression then maybe it was worth mentioning. I try to go with my first gut reaction in terms of critiques, because it usually pays off when I take that approach to my own art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-06 07:36:53 +0000 UTC]

No problem, it's a good idea to critique first and ask questions later...
I still say it's bright though. When I remove my glasses to look at it unfocused, the animal stands out a lot from its surroundings. Which may or may not be a good thing, but that's how I saw it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nemo-ramjet [2008-04-04 17:20:17 +0000 UTC]

Very nice work... The fictitious ecology is also well- thought out! Were you inspired by simillarly flower-faced batavian ur bats and rhinogrades?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nemo-ramjet [2008-04-04 17:15:15 +0000 UTC]

Very nice work... The fictitious ecology is also well- thought out! Were you inspired by simillarly flower-faced batavian ur bats and rhinogrades?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to nemo-ramjet [2008-04-04 18:51:56 +0000 UTC]

Actually, this started out as a parody of those sweet "faeries" (gad, I hate that term) always flitting around flowers. I thought the idea of giving them a natural predator was loopy enough. I was further inspired by the orphyx, a species of animal that appears in Le Grand Pouvoir Du Chninkel by van Hamme and Rosinski, and which looks like the unloved child of a dragon and an orchid. The rhinogrades and ur-bats came in last.

This may or may not become a series, depending on how much time I have on my hands...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

nemo-ramjet In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-06 10:22:33 +0000 UTC]

Really cool... Faeries, Dragons and Tolkienesque assemblages of elves, orcs and dwarfs are among my least favorite imaginary beings too...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to nemo-ramjet [2008-04-07 05:36:49 +0000 UTC]

Yup, they've been overdone ad nauseam. But dragons have the potential to be endlessly cool, given the freedom one has in doing them. As long as it's vaguely lizardy, it's a dragon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nemo-ramjet In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-05-10 15:06:50 +0000 UTC]

Aww, come on! A dragon is just a piece of speculative zoology with no justification and background!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to nemo-ramjet [2008-05-12 06:13:55 +0000 UTC]

Varanus komodoensis is a dragon. Deal with it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-04 18:56:02 +0000 UTC]

I'd love to see more! It reminds me of one of my all-time favorite fantasy creatures, the Butterfly Dragon, as illustrated by Mark Ferrari in S. Petersen's Field Guide to the Dreamlands, a Call of Cthulhu RPG supplement.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-05 07:11:09 +0000 UTC]

There's much potential for diversity here, what with all the flowers in the world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-06 06:10:29 +0000 UTC]

Oh, no doubt...I would love to see your take on an orchid or iris dragon. Or how about a pitcher plant or Venus' flytrap? Watch out for those teeth! I was working on a planet of plant/animal symbionts a while back, ala Brian Aldiss' "Hothouse." Man, this makes me want to get back to work on it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-06 07:39:37 +0000 UTC]

Venus flytraps are monstrous to begin with!

I had already pictured a sauropod-like saguaro dragon, lined with prickles; a pachydermous rafflesia dragon; a serpentine pitcher-plant dragon... They seem to work best with tropical flowers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-07 05:51:27 +0000 UTC]

Oh man, those all sound so cool...I want to see the saguaro dragon, just because it's the hardest for me to picture. Are you imagining dorsal spines, or maybe something like Saltasaurus...?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-07 11:05:28 +0000 UTC]

Too early to tell.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Piatnitskysaurus [2008-04-04 08:46:41 +0000 UTC]

truly stunning and seamless

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to Piatnitskysaurus [2008-04-04 11:08:03 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Piatnitskysaurus In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-05 03:28:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EmperorDinobot [2008-04-04 07:59:42 +0000 UTC]

Wow, that's beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to EmperorDinobot [2008-04-04 11:07:42 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0