Comments: 64
Mudkipy In reply to Mudkipy [2010-09-02 10:36:18 +0000 UTC]
nvm , i see the reason why(now that i read the comments) , the only reason i really ever liked Che is because of his military prowess during the cuban revolution , kinda like how i see Stalin was a great leader despite what he did (seriously ,the man was pretty ahead of everybody else and got his country to become a world power) too bad it turned bad when he left :<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ModalMechanica [2009-01-26 22:57:45 +0000 UTC]
Nice work, although I don't agree with a few of them. Its still nice work. Oh I don't know how much a red star represents "freedom" but whatever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dizzyfool [2008-09-23 22:33:22 +0000 UTC]
Interesting piece
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
awesomedaisy27 [2007-12-16 05:23:06 +0000 UTC]
Uh, tell me I didn't just see Karl Marx. Last time I checked, he invented communism.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pirato [2007-09-29 05:04:10 +0000 UTC]
Where's Al Sharpton
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
glunkaglunkaclank [2006-10-06 01:44:35 +0000 UTC]
WOW, you ovbiously put alot of effort into that. thats really great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pojems [2006-09-23 19:05:57 +0000 UTC]
There are people on the list and in that star that some souls would not regard in any way as a freedom fighter and there are others that some simply do not believe in.
Let us start with Jesus Christ. Of course there is dispute over his existence and his religion and his bible, but the cool part about my point is that it doesn’t matter if he physically lived or not and it doesn’t matter what your personal feelings are about Christianity. The fact is that Christ (whether he is real or not) has affected the world and continues to affect the world for two THOUSAND years. A LOT of stuff has been done in the name of Christ. Some could claim he is the soul reason for hundreds of wars and thousands of terrible acts (what with the whole divine monarch thing.) Others could claim that “the one and only savior just wants peace on earth and in men, that he loves you even if you don’t love him, that he is nothing but peace and love, PEACE AND LOVE!” Christ exists if not in any other way then simply in the actions of his followers. So even if you do not believe in the Christian faith, millions of others do and they do horrible and great things for his cause. They liberate countries and fly off to dangerous places to help in his name ...and they also touch little boys. But you get my point. Now here is another point.
It is interesting that Mao, responsible for millions of deaths, hangs there immortalized, while there is Marx, that heavy bearded, naive philosopher, sequestered by his side. Both men connected in one philosophy and yet completely different in the execution of that philosophy. I do not believe Mao to be a freedom fighter in general (which is beside the point), but specifically in this case because though millions died leaping forward, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are left out because of another horrible act, slavery. How can you pick and choose which action is worse and then based upon your feeling deny them freedom-fighter status for it? I do not agree with slavery or murder and my personal belief is that Mao is not in any way a freedom fighter, that George Washington (as twittering and slave ridden as he is) and Thomas Jefferson (even with all his condemning atrocities) are indeed Freedom Fighters. To clarify, I am not asking Mao be taken off the list, as that would be hypocritical of me, I am asking however that the two founding fathers, whose names have tired out my fingers as I have repeatedly typed them, be up there, despite their flaws, just like Mao and a huge chunk of other humans on that list and in that star.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Isla-Heredia [2006-09-02 06:41:01 +0000 UTC]
the same happens with euskadi ta askartasuna, they aren't freedom figthers, their politic was, for a long, long time, shoot the head of everybody doesn't think like them and this is one of the "ideas" since the fall of franquism and the arriving of the democracy to spain.
Now they has change (everybody want) his politic an they are trying a diplomatic exit for them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheShadeOfScottBrown [2006-08-03 05:04:57 +0000 UTC]
yea...osama never killed anyone. that was our own government.
but the new black panthers dude is kinda crazy. malik shabaaz or whoever. the black panthers shouldn't be counted as freedom fighters, cuz they don't fight anymore. the US gov. killed their leaders, threw a bunch in jail and beat the hell out of alot of black folk to make sure they'd turn into the freedom prancers we see today. unless they still run shit outside the camera view.]
VIVA LA MUERTE!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ericambros [2005-11-19 01:59:21 +0000 UTC]
I hardly agree with a lot of people on the list being freedom fighters. I'm sure they might see themselves as freedom fighters, but as winston churchill once put it, "history will be kind to me, for i intend to write it." But also, it wasnt made for everyone to agree with. Nice concept to say the least though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pigsinzen [2005-08-29 10:53:41 +0000 UTC]
dude! how could you remove Che...he is the most iconic revolutionalist there is...revolutionalist...is there such a word? any way...when any one sticks up a big red star or a rasied fist...you can't help but think about Che Guevara...i just think its a shame you had to drop him...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Palestinian-Pride [2005-08-11 21:12:51 +0000 UTC]
man i just LOVE THIS, im from Jenin you see.....
and BTW " wa alaykom il salam "
we need more people like you on this site ! keep up the good work !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eLKaeR [2005-01-14 05:33:32 +0000 UTC]
Right... but what about heroes like Giuseppe Garibaldi, Thaddeus Kosciuszko and Casimir Pulaski?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
r3s3nt In reply to eLKaeR [2005-01-15 04:59:12 +0000 UTC]
I almost had Garibaldi on there...
there are many many hundreds of people like this... it's hard to get them all in on one piece... that's why I made a second and am planning a third and fourth and possibly fifth. They'll get on there, trust me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mrflanagan [2005-01-08 02:41:07 +0000 UTC]
It was a good job... Util I read "Euskadi Ta Askatasuna".
Don't be fooled by some fascists who use the red colour but the nazi mentality. Since its origin in the dictatorship, they have changed their targets... Now they kill people, separatist, non-separatist and non-connected with the basque situation (basically, thay make terrorist attaks with random innocent victims to claim "We are still alive"). Our democracy isn't fully real, but the fucking murders of random people aren't needed to shout "Revolution!" and show your ideas (at least for the moment).
I don't wan to censure your work (sorry if I sound conservative, it isn't my intention!), I coincide with you in the majority of the names you've put, but I thought that a closer view of that people would be useful.
C'ya!
(PS: I'm spanish and mostly anarchist)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
r3s3nt In reply to mrflanagan [2005-01-09 17:29:35 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, and thanks for the free education.
Cheers
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SrVnDaNK [2005-01-01 19:29:08 +0000 UTC]
r3s3nt, STOP LISTENING TO Antitheist! Ernesto "Che" Guevara has to be on the list. He was a TRUE freedom fighter. 90% of the people on that list were at some point responsible for someones death. Che should be first on the list. If anyone should be removed it's Mahmoud Abbas, because he's just a rich beaurocrat that in my opinion, will set the PLO's cuase back decades (profit/bride driven). Ask anyone in Latin America, Che belongs on this wallpaper. BTW, can you submit a higher resolution version of this wallpaper?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
silentlydrowning [2005-01-01 02:45:46 +0000 UTC]
I think this is going to bring me to tears.....may the fight continue! What a great piece!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ernestoguevara [2004-12-31 19:17:48 +0000 UTC]
JEBUS!!!!!!!!!!!!! thats awsome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Antitheist [2004-12-31 18:56:36 +0000 UTC]
it's times like these I realize that I don't know shit. Amazing work, simply amazing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Antitheist In reply to Antitheist [2004-12-31 19:31:40 +0000 UTC]
wait, if you have Che, where's Osama bin Laden?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
r3s3nt In reply to Antitheist [2004-12-31 19:45:17 +0000 UTC]
I know the arguments against Che... most of them I've heard from you (indeed, I was expecting you to raise this point)...
I understand the contempt for Che as well, and you make good arguments against him. Also, I hate the fact that he's so popularized to a bunch of morons who don't realize that he was responsible for many deaths. At the same time, I dare not exclude him from this list. If you take note of the description, I said that these are people and things related to a fight for freedom somewhere in the world. Like him or not, Che was, at least at one point in his life, a freedom fighter. Now, on the other hand, you could make the argument, as you seem to, that OBL was at one point a freedom fighter, just as Mousillini, just as Stalin... maybe you notice the absence of Thomas Jefforson and George Washington... they were most definately freedom fighters, the only reason they're not on there is that they owned slaves. So why do those people's vices keep them off of the list and Che gets to be on?
I battled with myself for a good time deliberating whether or not to put him on... I put that off until the end, which is why he's at the bottom. In the end, I felt it would be unjust to have Fidel and Raul Castro on and not Che..
Also, remember that you don't have to agree with everyone or everything on the list... I don't. If you'll note, a number of the people on the list contradict each other. Lenin, Marx, and Trotsky to Jesus, Moses, and Muhammad, for instance. Traditional communist philosophy involves athieism (which is not something I endorse, personally). Then you have MLK and Ghandi... the non-violent activists... side-by-side with Generals such as Mao and Li Dazhou.
Samuel Adams was a veritable terrorist as well... he lead the Sons of Liberty, who were classified by the British government as terrorists... they burnt British buildings and murdered British tax collectors.
If issue is taken with Che, then I may as well throw out the whole thing. Life is not as black and white as we would wish.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
EphemeralFemininity In reply to r3s3nt [2005-08-14 04:31:53 +0000 UTC]
You are truly amazing. Such a wealth of knowledge. There are so many things that are debatable on this list, but as you said, like it or not, they are there. Though I noticed only a handfull of women on this list. Rosa Parks, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Jane Hunt, Mary Ann McLintock, Martha C. Wright. The NWSA (National Women's Suffrage Association) Are some of the many women that are not recognized, other than that, I do believe you did a great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
r3s3nt In reply to EphemeralFemininity [2005-08-14 06:09:42 +0000 UTC]
There need to be more women, you're absolutely correct. And I did notice this when I was making it. The problem was that I couldn't name nearly as many women as I should like. After I made it, I realized some that I left off, such as Andrea Dworkin, but comparatively I'm more ignorant on womens' issues than I should be, and I regret it.
It just shows how sexist our society is still that even among controversial radicals, women get so little notice... that even in studying such people, so few get recognition - and when they do, rarely is it the recognition that is due.
Thanks for the comment and for noticing the lack of women... I'm glad someone is paying attention.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EphemeralFemininity In reply to r3s3nt [2005-08-14 17:52:07 +0000 UTC]
Well as I am a feminist, I tend to notice these things. I think you did a wonderful job, and the women that did make that list more than deserve the recognition. The names that I gave you are just a few that I know of, and I've recently thought of one more, Betty Friedan. This is such a great piece and I love how you put the links of there for everyone to learn about who these people were/are. I myself learned alot from this. Thank you again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Antitheist In reply to r3s3nt [2004-12-31 19:50:44 +0000 UTC]
i wouldn't say mussolini and stalin were freedom fighters in any regard, but i do believe that if che was a freedom fighter, then so is OBL.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Poncho-Juju In reply to Antitheist [2005-01-01 20:48:56 +0000 UTC]
Che Guevara didn't use similar tactics as Osama Bin Ladin. He was fighting with guerillas ; and mostly against the military forces, be it in Cuba or in Bolivia, for instance. These guerillas were mostly fought under the traditional war outlook ; that is to say, occasional sabotage or attacks, but on the other hand, no attack specifically targetted on civilians such as what terrorists do, or what Osama Bin Ladin did, planning he attacks on the WTC.
Che Guevara would be closer to French Resistance, as ~r3s3nt said, or to someone like commandant Massoud, than to Osama Bin Ladin (unless you only consider him as a force against the USSR occupation of Afghanistan).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Antitheist In reply to Poncho-Juju [2005-01-02 00:55:22 +0000 UTC]
i wasn't trying to villianize che (even though i don't like him) i was exalting Osama.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
pojems In reply to Antitheist [2006-09-23 18:13:42 +0000 UTC]
Why would you exalt Osama. Please note i am not trying to start an argument, i'm just curious...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Antitheist In reply to pojems [2006-09-23 22:04:22 +0000 UTC]
because he fights for what he believes in and doesn't rely on state power in order to get things done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pojems In reply to Antitheist [2006-09-23 23:20:30 +0000 UTC]
interesting theory.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Antitheist In reply to pojems [2006-09-24 15:20:47 +0000 UTC]
to an anarchist, it's more respectable than Che Guevara
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pojems In reply to Antitheist [2006-09-26 05:06:15 +0000 UTC]
As I do not know much about Che and only wanted to know your thinking behind exalting Osama, I won't respond in any other way than this. Maybe to an anarchist not relying on state power is more respectable then the actions taken whilst not relying on state power and "getting things done", but as a human I think exalting a murderer of thousands (no matter what the reason or means) is just wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Antitheist In reply to pojems [2006-09-26 06:02:29 +0000 UTC]
I've become far too objective for my own good...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pojems In reply to Antitheist [2006-09-26 06:30:58 +0000 UTC]
i find myself doing that....lol, i think maybe the world is doing that as well, maybe we all need to remember we're all the same inside what with all the muscle and tissue and blood and whatnot...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Antitheist In reply to pojems [2006-09-26 15:48:10 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, my problem is that I'm objective beyond morality...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Poncho-Juju In reply to Antitheist [2005-01-02 09:30:25 +0000 UTC]
Exalting Osama? That's original.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>