HOME | DD

uki--uki — Anyone

Published: 2014-05-19 18:39:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 1273; Favourites: 39; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description "Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." George Orwell

When Propaganda Fails, Humanity Awakens – The Fall of Mainstream MediaIt doesn’t happen often, but The New York Times (NYT) has truthfully reported on something recently.

On what did it report? Well, on itself, and how alarmed it is due to its own increasing irrelevance in the face of new sources of information.

NYT is well-aware of the “New Media,” as a 96-page internal report , sent to top executives last month, makes clear. Obtained by Buzzfeed, the report “paints a dark picture of a newsroom struggling more dramatically than is immediately visible to adjust to the digital world, a newsroom that is hampered primarily by its own storied culture.”

The report ignores its traditional mainstream (MSM) competitors and takes a closer look at new digital companies like First Look Media, Vox, Huffington Post, Business Insider and Buzzfeed.

“They are ahead of us in building impressive support systems for digital journalists, and that gap will grow unless we quickly improve our capabilities,” the report states. “Meanwhile, our journalism advantage is shrinking as more of these upstarts expand their newsrooms.”

“We are not moving with enough urgency,” it says.

A central issue for NYT is “a cadre of editors who remain unfamiliar with the web.”

“Many desks lack editors who even know how to evaluate digital work,” the report continues. A few suggestions NYT is looking into is a TED talks-style event series and an expanded op-ed platform, including location-based local news and information.

But it is too late…

Read more: www.zengardner.com/propaganda-…

__________________________________________________________________


SEPTEMBER CLUES.info

The News Media had a central role in pulling off the 9/11 psy-op. The operation involved airing on television a substitute, computer-generated version of reality. It has temporarily succeeded to sell to the world the preposterous tale of 19 young terrorists using hijacked airliners to attack the USA. This longstanding research has established the falseness of the images shown on LIVE TV on 9/11 – as well as all the subsequently released video material. A large number of casualties was also reported to generate public outrage and support for illegal wars of aggression. However, the September Clues research has determined that the alleged victims were fictitious identities mostly/or entirely created within the digital realm. The 9/11 hoax - and the phony "War on Terror" - are definitively exposed by method revealed.

Related content
Comments: 4

fiskefyren [2014-05-19 21:56:47 +0000 UTC]

Terrorist? Please "one man's hero is another man's villain" there really isn't more to it than that. It's all a matter of perspective! But yes, this very clearly illustrates the mass brainwashing that takes place in most households. 
-with love from an Agnostic 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

icu8124me In reply to fiskefyren [2014-05-20 08:19:45 +0000 UTC]

You are correct in a Rational Thinking society, but it is True today in America that thr definition of a Terrorist that was put into the Patriot Act (that's anything but) was so broad in language it was the reason Rep.Ron Paul voted against it & I think one other also! No-one would have a reason to go after them in the sense we were told, but anyone paying attention could see why the language was so loose to the point of being used against us Citizens. It boils down to anyone now can be labled a Terrorist by the US Gov that "they" see any action is taken agsinst it. That's litterally Everything. Now you & I know I don't like that Period, but they've pushed & pushed it 's boundaries to make it so. Thought I'd say something. Peace

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fiskefyren In reply to icu8124me [2014-05-21 13:54:11 +0000 UTC]

All dat new speak... it reminds me of "the child protection act" which had nothing to do with the protection of children! But it's a clever way to disguise your true agenda. Like if I called a law "baby raping act" that wouldn't be voted for even if it was something like lowering taxes, which we all know Americans would vote 99.99% for!

I hate labelling... it's like good and evil, but people fail to realize that not everyone consider the same act as good or evil, like how I think that mercy-killing is a good thing, but most people would probably consider that "very evil".
-with love from an Agnostic 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

icu8124me In reply to fiskefyren [2014-05-21 19:07:12 +0000 UTC]

I can easily agree with you on all this. The same way we make Laws & when we make them, the meaning has always been what we intended it 2B hence: "Intent of the Law" but unfortunatly with all these (4 lack of a better word) Devils running about manipulating the linguistics of language, they have now flipped that on it's head to now it's "The Letter of the Law" which is wrong on so many levels, but done so they can manuver between the raindrops, if you will. Just as when Polititions give a speach or have a debate, the avg Joe Public (which I had considered myself until seeking & learning more) that the substance isn't the important thing when they do, but it's the "FRAME" of the question that is. As the Evil word Ninja himself says, it's how you FRAME the Question or Subject, b/c changing the words slightly might sound the same, but will envoke different responses from those who don't recognize the Trick! This from, most know him from segs on FOX NEWS, but the Name is "Frank Luntz" & to those who don't know of who it is I speak, go to CSPAN & type the name as he's givin several lectures on the subject & the most recent on the run up to 2012 election! It would serve you a Positive in doing so. With that, have a good one. Peace

👍: 0 ⏩: 0