HOME | DD

Armando-Huerta In reply to Armando-Huerta [2012-02-05 16:09:31 +0000 UTC]

*PEDOPHILE, PEDOFILE whatever, you know what I mean. Stay away of kids or else! I'm watching you...

No, really, I'm reporting you with the authorities. We are watching you. Closely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 4

Seundeux In reply to Armando-Huerta [2013-11-16 04:15:38 +0000 UTC]

wait

what

you gotta be joking

Drawing children =/= pedophilia

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MaudeDraws In reply to Seundeux [2013-11-27 00:20:40 +0000 UTC]

He draws objectifying images of grown up women and no one is against that. But someone draws a picture of a little girl, a rather innocent picture compared to his deviations, and he thinks they're a pedophile? Really?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Seundeux In reply to MaudeDraws [2013-11-30 04:23:27 +0000 UTC]

I'm fine with people drawing that kinda stuff so long as they don't throw themselves into other matters; such as what happened here. 

Because then when they start pressing their opinions onto other people for some reason they think they're way is the best and righteous way when it isn't for everyone? 

Sexualization of adults isn't a society taboo, while pedophilia is; which is why nobody really cares about the explicit implications of his work (Or perhaps a girl who draws boys in such a way)

He either is being a hypocrite(Probably not) or he's just simply ill-informed. 

tl;dr I don't give a shit about what other people draw so long as they don't impose themselves on other peoples' things; this guy did that and wow rude much? (To him not to you hnn)

ps. sorry for not being coherent I feel pretty sick atm

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MaudeDraws In reply to Seundeux [2013-11-30 21:20:41 +0000 UTC]

That pretty much sums it up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Seundeux In reply to MaudeDraws [2013-11-30 23:44:47 +0000 UTC]

yep

this is why I lurk most of the time rather than post lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Armando-Huerta In reply to Seundeux [2013-11-16 05:41:48 +0000 UTC]

I was kidding, jezz

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jingsketch In reply to Armando-Huerta [2012-02-20 15:16:17 +0000 UTC]

Obviously not, brother

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

uturo128 In reply to Armando-Huerta [2012-02-06 05:51:27 +0000 UTC]

Oh, yeah?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shyaknoif In reply to Armando-Huerta [2012-02-05 22:30:31 +0000 UTC]

1.There is this style, called “anime”, where artists often vastly distort the anatomy of the human body. Often times figures look child-like, due to the enlarged heads and baby-like faces. Though more often than not, the artist isn’t trying to depict a child, it is just part of the style and its distortion of typical anatomy.

2.Calling this picture sexual is a large stretch. It could only be seen as sexual by someone who is looking for something sexual in it. After visiting your gallery, I can only assume this is exactly what you are doing.

I suggest you go back to your pornographic traces and leave this artist (who actually knows how to paint) alone. If a picture like this comes up in front of you again, slow down and ask yourself what makes it pedophilia, how reasonable your assessment is in consideration of the realistic-ness of the picture, and how pedophilia is correctly spelled.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0