Comments: 22
mydeadlyimagination [2012-09-30 05:12:31 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much... I love you. Oh my god.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Torotiel [2012-09-29 13:23:38 +0000 UTC]
What kind of narrow minded, uneducated, egotistical people even think this peh
You should also make one feminist =/= man hater because it's the same people that would even call for this stamp to be made
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
V1KA In reply to Torotiel [2012-09-29 13:28:54 +0000 UTC]
I'll keep that on my mind! Thanks for suggesting. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AsheSkyler [2012-09-22 16:41:23 +0000 UTC]
Never met a lesbian, or at least I'm not aware if I did, but I've nearly decided that if you're past your 40s and have been married more than once, you're a bitter man-hater. I've only met one woman in that description who wasn't. The rest nagged me to never date, and you wouldn't believe all the nasty stuff I heard when I was engaged. =/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Numb3r34 In reply to AsheSkyler [2012-09-22 21:11:01 +0000 UTC]
I'd encourage you not to make such a broad generalization on the basis of having informally observed such a small sample group. Consider that you haven't meant anywhere near one percent of the women on this planet; or in your country, for that matter.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
AsheSkyler In reply to Numb3r34 [2012-09-22 21:49:05 +0000 UTC]
Hoity-toity. I didn't say EVERY woman in EVERY part of the world. I just said that all but one of the divorced women over 40 that I had met had been bitter, nagging man-haters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Numb3r34 In reply to AsheSkyler [2012-09-22 22:43:22 +0000 UTC]
You're right. The fact that you've met (thank you for pointing out my grammatical error) such a small portion of the population is not relevant to what you initially expressed.
However, "I've nearly decided that if you're past your 40s and have been married more than once, you're a bitter man-hater" does implicitly refer to all women who meet the description you've given. I'd put forth a similar argument with reference to the group described.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AsheSkyler In reply to Numb3r34 [2012-09-24 04:12:35 +0000 UTC]
Do you also argue Bible verses based on one sentence rather than the whole verse?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Numb3r34 In reply to AsheSkyler [2012-09-24 06:30:51 +0000 UTC]
I might, were that sentence the thesis of the entire piece of text.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AsheSkyler In reply to Numb3r34 [2012-09-25 00:56:02 +0000 UTC]
Yet my paragraph was not "all women of such and such category are bad" or even stating that I did fully believe that, but you're pretending that I did. Get a little bored one night and decide to blow something out of proportion for troll kicks?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
V1KA In reply to N1hila [2012-09-22 15:32:14 +0000 UTC]
You know, it's very annoying when people just assume things like that. For example, I could actually start a family with a man, no problem with that. I just would never find him sexually appealing to me..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
N1hila In reply to V1KA [2012-09-22 16:32:34 +0000 UTC]
Nobody should be judged because of that, people can have different sexual attractions, as long as two people love each other, what's the problem? Love knows no gender or rules.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Frey4 [2012-09-22 14:23:18 +0000 UTC]
itsellä on lesbo kavereita mutta eivät ne vihaa miehiö.
mutta hieno stamp o u o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
V1KA In reply to Frey4 [2012-09-22 14:24:52 +0000 UTC]
Mutta hieno stamp? >'D Öö? Täähän just meinaa sitä ettei kaikki vihaa miehiä. Stereotypia vaan.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Frey4 In reply to V1KA [2012-09-22 15:18:29 +0000 UTC]
jep en tainut sitten tajuta ideaa ^^ mutta kuitebkina sfjhgfes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
V1KA In reply to Frey4 [2012-09-22 15:24:55 +0000 UTC]
"=/=" merkki meinaa niiku "doesn't equal". Jos siinä ois pelkkä "=" nii sit se varmaa vastais sitä mitä sää aluks käsitit. X'D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
V1KA In reply to Frey4 [2012-09-22 16:13:37 +0000 UTC]
Kiva kuulla, jos selvensi! :')) Joka päivä oppii jotain uutta.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Frey4 In reply to V1KA [2012-09-22 16:38:46 +0000 UTC]
o u o
👍: 0 ⏩: 0