Comments: 32
shortchica4life [2008-10-25 07:41:08 +0000 UTC]
Gay or straight, posed or candid, this shot says a lot.. no matter how you look at it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Inutang18 [2007-01-22 06:34:29 +0000 UTC]
actually, i kinda agree with Bunkmate4... ^_^ this picture looks so peaceful... your comment about his sexuality took away from it a bit... but when i took a second look, it was really hard to see a real hint of anything but peace and friendship in the picture... ^_^ in my simple minds opinion anyway...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ameon [2006-01-09 06:52:40 +0000 UTC]
aawwww
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Caramel--Chokecherry [2005-09-07 01:00:05 +0000 UTC]
they're like life-long friends rnt they.. i like this set
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vandalgirl In reply to transparentwarrior [2004-10-20 03:18:52 +0000 UTC]
Aww, thank you that means a lot to me. I'm really glad that people can see the friendship aspect of this photo. And it makes me smile that it makes you smile.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vandalgirl In reply to holydak [2004-09-20 04:33:56 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much. I never really thought about the braclet geing hidden in the first one, but that does add meaning.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Azildin [2004-09-12 20:23:05 +0000 UTC]
Regardless if one is gay and one isn't, just the fact that they did the setup for you speaks bounds about how much they trust you and love you in their lives. When I look at these photo's, I feel a sense of stability and reliability. I wish more people could be as entrusting with each other as these two are.
Great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vandalgirl In reply to Azildin [2004-09-12 20:49:28 +0000 UTC]
Oh wow, thank you so much.
You made me realize just how much I miss these two because I recently moved away. But you're right, the trust they put in me speaks volumes.
Thank you so much for the thoughtful comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lladdedig [2004-07-20 06:26:51 +0000 UTC]
Nice... no matter what anyone says... a picture is only for that moment and a viewer can take anything from it they like... I see friendship and emotion. A job well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vandalgirl In reply to lladdedig [2004-07-20 06:36:41 +0000 UTC]
Aww, I think that is the nicest comment I have ever gotten. Thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lladdedig In reply to vandalgirl [2004-07-20 06:38:22 +0000 UTC]
Well, it is true. You have talent and can see when emotion should be captured.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KinkyKitty-stock [2004-07-20 05:55:47 +0000 UTC]
how cute...
love how the shot hints at them being gay...and then you turn it all around in the description
Don't judge a book by its cover i spose!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
andthelivingwillenvy [2004-07-16 05:00:43 +0000 UTC]
awww those boys are so pretty i like these pictures they're cute
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FoogliZeldeen [2004-07-14 23:55:40 +0000 UTC]
I like how their legs are, and PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE use them more....they are excellentay.
Love,
Libby and Pippie
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
bloomeysgirl In reply to FoogliZeldeen [2004-07-17 04:21:23 +0000 UTC]
hey- as Chris's sister- i can get you pictures of him naked as a kid
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vandalgirl In reply to FoogliZeldeen [2004-07-15 00:24:24 +0000 UTC]
I will certainly try to use them more but I will be moving away in August...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FoogliZeldeen In reply to vandalgirl [2004-07-15 06:18:08 +0000 UTC]
Oh please do more of them before you move. I am totaly in love with the both of them. AHHH my heart is broken. Shattered.
Love, Libby
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bunkmate4 [2004-07-10 05:45:41 +0000 UTC]
thats not a stereotype , its deductive reasoning.
and um ill take that as your acceptance of myattemt to apolugise lol if not , to bad i tried my b est.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vandalgirl In reply to bunkmate4 [2004-07-11 23:09:24 +0000 UTC]
Its alright, I just wanted you to know that I wasn't part of the problem. Now then, let's start over, its nice to meet you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BayernMunich In reply to bunkmate4 [2004-07-09 03:54:21 +0000 UTC]
or embrace it for that matter, eh? Stop with the stereotypes, or quit complaining about them, allright?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bunkmate4 [2004-07-08 07:56:12 +0000 UTC]
This set of photographs are very well done . however the the constant denials of homsexuality apon one of the models distracts heavily from the viewer.
its very sad that anyone would care if someone thought they apeard gay in a photograph that in my opinion is far from overtly homoerotic, or homsexual at all for that matter.
when did allowing someone to touch you become an invitation to sex ? i really would like to know because thats hwo it seems things are viewed these days.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vandalgirl In reply to bunkmate4 [2004-07-08 08:30:30 +0000 UTC]
While I respect your opinion and see your point of view it was in fact Michael himself that asked me to put a discmaimer on as a stipulation for me putting them on internet, which should be his right. He was understandably a little uncomfortable with people percieving him as something he wasn't, just like when I posted pictures of a male and a female friend of mine posing together I made it clear that they were not a couple. Generally I try to let the picture represent itself and the description is just wear I write things that I find amusing, such as the fact that every so often Mike would mention the fact that he was not really gay, this made its way into my description to amuse my friends who were there. Also, Chris is sure that Michael is actually gay so Mike feels even more obligated to mention that he is not. The pictures were meant to have homosexual undertones that were going to be more overt but Michael was uncomfortable and they were thusly scaled down. If my descriptions distract you feel free not to read them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Minyacarka [2004-07-08 06:06:02 +0000 UTC]
awww....thats cute...i liek it ^_^ but i also like man-love, so...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0