HOME | DD

vertigo66 In reply to thrilldude91 [2012-01-07 15:53:18 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Chachibenji In reply to somedude248 [2006-10-06 03:59:30 +0000 UTC]

OH MAN ITS SO COOL TO BE A FAG SRSLY GUYS

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

somedude248 In reply to Chachibenji [2006-10-06 04:02:24 +0000 UTC]

You're calling me a fag because these pictures have no sense of antaomy? Is that is asshole?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chachibenji In reply to somedude248 [2006-10-06 04:04:47 +0000 UTC]

No, just cause youre being a jerk, actually. : D
"Horrific would be calling it swell" or whatever you said.
Das about as generous as a your mother comment. o:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

somedude248 In reply to Chachibenji [2006-10-06 04:10:33 +0000 UTC]

Well the anatomy is grotesque, not because Mihoshi was on steroids, but because the body isn't properly aligned. The author must have thought piling muscle on top of muscle would look sexy and took no heed to how they were supposed to fit on the overall body.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chachibenji In reply to somedude248 [2006-10-06 04:39:34 +0000 UTC]

Tough luck. Its fantasy art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

somedude248 In reply to Chachibenji [2006-10-06 05:05:46 +0000 UTC]

Jeez, you muscle chick lovers sure get defensive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

andydudey2k4 In reply to somedude248 [2006-10-29 15:23:44 +0000 UTC]

God forbid anyone likes something different than what you like. Yes, everyone must have the same interests or there will be hell to pay! Here's some food for thought; if you don't like something, that's fine, that's your choice, but you needn't let others know just how you feel about a certain piece of art.

If you dislike FMG art, great, but I, and others who are indeed interested don't really care, and would prefer if you and your ilk wouldn't blast FMG art with "OMG DATS SIK LOL" or some other bullshit.

You do have a back button on your internet browser for a reason. I suggest you use it sometime you come across something you dislike.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

somedude248 In reply to andydudey2k4 [2006-10-31 00:18:39 +0000 UTC]

Yes, because God forbid a review of a piece of art isn't glowing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SimplifiedLife In reply to somedude248 [2007-08-07 07:30:36 +0000 UTC]

~somedude248 has a point, an artist must receive reviews and opinions from anyone no matter whether it is positive or negative. Whatever the genre the artist chooses to place them self in there will be critics and mindless supporters; critiques and adoring fans. He just happens to help out the artist by telling said artist what he doesn't like so in future pieces the artist may choose to incorporate the review into his work.[link]
Content

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

andydudey2k4 In reply to somedude248 [2006-11-02 13:27:57 +0000 UTC]

Right, but no one held a gun to your head and forced you to look at it, did they? You clicked on it by choice because you wanted to pick a fight, or just for kicks to see if people would start arguing. Or maybe you just wanted to sound like a hoity-toity, cappuchino-drinking, art critic douche-bag. That sounds right too. Well, have fun with that, Chachi, because I'm done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

somedude248 In reply to andydudey2k4 [2006-11-02 23:06:53 +0000 UTC]

When someone posts a piece of art in a public area, like it or not, they invite positive as well as negative criticism. My issues stem from the anatomy and how plain wrong it is, not the muscles in and of themselves.

If the artist doesn't want negative criticism, he won't post the artwork.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

andydudey2k4 In reply to somedude248 [2006-11-04 13:15:07 +0000 UTC]

*Sigh* You're still going at it? Whatever. I don't care anymore.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chachibenji In reply to somedude248 [2006-10-06 19:01:35 +0000 UTC]

If you called anyones stuff "horiffic" I dont think theyd appreciate it.
Also lololol "you muscle chick lovers" OH SHIETS PREJUDICE OH MAN

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MercuryIII In reply to BMML [2009-07-23 12:45:13 +0000 UTC]

Why don't you try S20K00Y's gallery on for size?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0