HOME | DD
vishstudio — Zoom it
[NSFW]
Published: 2009-02-20 15:52:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 6482; Favourites: 153; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
my insta www.instagram.com/vishnyakovpr…for commercial use -download for points/feel free to buy as donation
If you want photos in hi res or for ads and book covers contact me to buy via paypal
or you can buy them from this stock
Shutterstock www.shutterstock.com/g/energyb…
ADOBE stock.adobe.com/ru/contributor…
Dreamstime www.dreamstime.com/#res338719
DepositPhotos depositphotos.com?ref=1001552
Related content
Comments: 20
where can I find more pictures of him? he's...Godly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Love the pose and him all soapy, again, great muscles. ^//^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Love the soap between his pecs. Great detail there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The composition is a beautiful one, and I tend to disagree with the others about the title of the shots you take. Beautifully captured!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i agree, the title on this (and one or two others) doesn't fit the picture.
it's difficult sometimes to go into a lot of detail about a picture if you are pressed for time, but an obscure title plus no artists notes can leave people a tad distracted.
however, having said that I do like this picture from the current set. subtle, stylish and erotic without being nasty. just what a good artistic nude photograph should be.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A copy of a note sent to another: I disagree with you on that. I think the photograph itself tells a story WAY more than its title. The title is but a subscript to the actual subject, the visual composition set before the viewer's eyes. There's no way a title can capture the essence of a visual work of art - though it *can* be a distraction if the viewer is attempting to put more into the title of the work than the work itself. There are numerous fine art pieces that have dislocated titles from the work that possesses them, and they are by no means less of a fine art piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fair enough we are all entitled to an opinion. i'm not saying it's a bad photograph, or even a bad title. i just personally don't see the connection between the two.
yes the photo on it's own should tell the whole story, but if you have a story about love and a title about cameras how is the audience to draw the connection?
the really point i wanted to express was we need more information in this particular picture to draw the same conclusions the artist did.
not that those conclusions are in any way incorrect as I know art is subjective. hell there are other photographers who number rather than name their pictures, in those cases you don't question the connection because you don't look for one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artists have their reasons for titles they choose for their pieces and may not 'make sense' to the myriads of people who view the work.
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder," and as such, as you've stated, is subjective. The artist may be stating nothing, or stating a great truth for themselves alone. Who are we to deviate that truth from them?
The fact that we are in a rhetorical debate proves a great point. It really doesn't matter the title of a piece - what matters is the observer's attitude toward him/herself in the viewing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i love your photography...but can i be candid about something...your titles are becoming really distracting to your wonderful photography...they seem forced for the sake of "having a title" and most of them dont relate to the photo..they may be something that you see, but they dont come across with the photo and they then leave the viewer (me) to try and figure out what you were thinking..thus losing the beauty of the photo....please take this as intended and not as an afront to you or your work as i think you do really beautiful photography and your a cool person!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I disagree with you on that. I think the photograph itself tells a story WAY more than its title. The title is but a subscript to the actual subject, the visual composition set before the viewer's eyes. There's no way a title can capture the essence of a visual work of art - though it *can* be a distraction if the viewer is attempting to put more into the title of the work than the work itself. There are numerous fine art pieces that have dislocated titles from the work that possesses them, and they are by no means less of a fine art piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hello...you obviously misread my remarks as your saying the same thing that i said..that the photograph tells the story not the title..thats why i told him not to worry about titles (which he agreed with my thoughts and that he is straining for titles and even asked me to help him with them)..please re-read my thought and i think you will see that we are almost saying the same thing...thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Just so. I have re-read your initial comments and my reply to it and apologize for flip-flopping on my stance. As I wrote to another as a reply:
Artists have their reasons for titles they choose for their pieces and may not 'make sense' to the myriads of people who view the work.
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder," and as such, as you've stated, is subjective. The artist may be stating nothing, or stating a great truth for themselves alone. Who are we to deviate that truth from them?
The fact that we are in a rhetorical debate proves a great point. It really doesn't matter the title of a piece - what matters is the observer's attitude toward him/herself in the viewing.
If the artist is 'stuck' for a title (because on here, one is *required*), it is up to the artist to make the best of the shortfall of words for the visual and we, the observers, to have a more yielding spirit and compassion towards the artist. That would be my corrected opinion. You're welcome - and thanks in return!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thanks again...be well and happy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
agree..but there like 2 boys in day-I sometimes empty with titles-can you help?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
glad you understood and took it as intended...titles are almost meaningless..i'll try to come up with something "interesting" but its hard to do without seeing the pics first..your such a lucky man to have so many beautiful models available!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0