Comments: 17
Kaliko08 [2017-12-14 17:01:17 +0000 UTC]
Edgy! Love it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vault111 [2017-07-21 03:28:24 +0000 UTC]
hey i'd like to buy the remaining lapis! oh, and let me know if you use usd or something
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watergems In reply to vault111 [2017-07-21 03:29:39 +0000 UTC]
yes i use usd! :0 send to dvdexe.art@gmail.com and i'll note you her files !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YA1N [2017-07-17 07:43:35 +0000 UTC]
can I buy royal lapis?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watergems In reply to YA1N [2017-07-17 15:27:06 +0000 UTC]
yup! send $$ to dvdexe.art@gmail.com and i'll note you her files ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YA1N In reply to watergems [2017-07-17 22:03:40 +0000 UTC]
Sent! ~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lymerikk [2017-07-16 23:24:32 +0000 UTC]
hey dude just wanted to mention with suh a large and complicated watermark its really quite difficult to see whats going on in thr pic and its super distracting qwq
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watergems In reply to lymerikk [2017-07-17 03:07:52 +0000 UTC]
is it? i updated it today with a lower opacity watermark; i can see how it can be distracting on royal given her dark palette, but i'd rather not make it smaller since i've had issues with others tracing ;_;
i use this watermark for everything else too and nobody has mentioned a problem with it :^0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lymerikk In reply to watergems [2017-07-17 10:37:19 +0000 UTC]
i think tis just cos its so large and close to the faces qwq
the differne her is like, in peices liek this
its kind of out of the way but its clearly there and does its job qwq if youre doing it bigger cos theese are adopts, may i suggest playing it somewhere less important? eg over the legs, thats what i usually do qwq
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watergems In reply to lymerikk [2017-07-17 15:32:42 +0000 UTC]
i do larger watermarks for adopts because i'm selling the designs
but i'll try to make the placement better in the future ^^
(funnily enough, this exact deviation was traced and turned into a base without permission lol)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lymerikk In reply to watergems [2017-07-17 16:35:25 +0000 UTC]
oh god?!! who did that ill beat them up >: /
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watergems In reply to lymerikk [2017-07-17 16:36:52 +0000 UTC]
LOL it's okay it was a while ago and they immediately took it down
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lymerikk In reply to watergems [2017-07-17 16:43:05 +0000 UTC]
gid what a mess thats the owrst.. why is it gemsona artist that this happens to
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
watergems In reply to lymerikk [2017-07-17 16:46:46 +0000 UTC]
people need bases for their gems/adopts and i guess people think my stuff is good enough/close to the show style lul
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
miguedoodles [2017-07-16 00:00:29 +0000 UTC]
these are wonderful go
i specailly love that you made realistic freckels for the dark one, it gives it a cool efect
good job pal!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0