HOME | DD

Yayashin β€” CHIMERA.02 [NSFW]

Published: 2012-03-27 13:26:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 15628; Favourites: 459; Downloads: 598
Redirect to original
Description Second chimera, I hope you like it
Related content
Comments: 39

bassgeisha [2016-05-21 05:33:14 +0000 UTC]

simply fantastic!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

alithking [2015-12-02 16:44:20 +0000 UTC]

WOW! beatiful and amazing art work, congratulations!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Barkindji [2014-11-28 12:15:28 +0000 UTC]

The pose of the front character really makes this piece for me. You've successfully shown both behavioural and cosmetic hybrid, where many will only focus on cosmetics.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

psangoesdown [2014-04-11 19:12:32 +0000 UTC]

that feet look real O_O

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mlauviah3400 [2013-10-25 02:22:23 +0000 UTC]

amazing work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MorriganArt [2013-05-21 09:22:35 +0000 UTC]

Featured in my journal [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Noe1976ade [2013-03-11 23:27:46 +0000 UTC]

just amazing‘‘

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

redetzke [2013-01-04 07:44:36 +0000 UTC]

lighting is dramatic - punches up your strong sense of mythical and magical themes perfectly. form and detail are stunning.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vampirekingdom [2012-12-02 22:19:35 +0000 UTC]

Feature here [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vampirekingdom [2012-11-22 23:45:19 +0000 UTC]

Superb!!!!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bpbradbury [2012-11-12 02:19:39 +0000 UTC]

amazing

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zak05 [2012-11-10 08:45:48 +0000 UTC]

[link] !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DrowsyBrowser [2012-05-13 22:18:01 +0000 UTC]

This is great. It's my favorite of the 3.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TravisGardenArt [2012-05-13 11:11:45 +0000 UTC]

Critique: Perfect skin tones.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

HeartOfDeath [2012-05-07 19:00:03 +0000 UTC]

glorious

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

M12G [2012-04-17 01:58:26 +0000 UTC]

That is indeed a chimera. I have one as well, though it's nothing like this, except the humanoid form. Oh, and mine has wings, but they're... complicated. Nice job, BTW.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Zak05 [2012-04-16 23:22:11 +0000 UTC]

Superb job !!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Payo-X [2012-04-10 17:26:13 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful imagination! I love the effects, the rendering, the idea, and even the ornamental wings. I find the composition interesting. The surrounding effect creates a nice feel but also "shallows" it a bit too much, almost flattening the overall piece. The stark reality of the subjects, their intense details, and lighting are kind of holding their own, but still seem to be fighting the background. The little one that appears to be materializing from the egg seems to be struggling hardest in the composition. Even with the background you have chosen, you might have had some of the darker areas extend behind it to help accentuate what is happening there.
Regardless, the aesthetic of this piece demands attention. Gorgeous!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gensanity [2012-04-10 03:27:32 +0000 UTC]

even better

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ErikShoemaker [2012-03-31 14:51:20 +0000 UTC]

wow this is awesome, I love how real it looks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AlexandriaDior [2012-03-31 13:50:54 +0000 UTC]

Your work has been featured: [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Blooy [2012-03-28 17:36:46 +0000 UTC]

the wings are too small, look at the small character their wings are much larger. they have length in size so it looks as if they can fly. those wings are long enough to touch the ankles while the larger figures extend to about the bottom of the back. i think it was just a spacing issue. other than that very nice work. i disagree on the dragon, in most lore they have hollowed out bones like most raptors allowing them to fly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Smiling-Demon [2012-03-28 12:56:49 +0000 UTC]

very well done.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sasan-ghods [2012-03-28 07:38:04 +0000 UTC]

omg
nice work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Michael7S [2012-03-27 17:12:17 +0000 UTC]

WOW!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mitia-Arcturus [2012-03-27 17:04:42 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful Artwork ... extraordinary light......!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mitia-Arcturus [2012-03-27 17:03:53 +0000 UTC]

Dear Friend Yayashin
Your creative Artwork is featured ...in
Fairy-Dreams-Fantaisy-ActionP ...[link]
Fantaisy Art-Portraits...[link]
Mystical-Mythologie-Esoteric...[link]
...
you are Most welcome!!! ...

regards

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

House-of-Kadamon [2012-03-27 14:05:44 +0000 UTC]

Realistically speaking, I would've made the wings bigger, but other then that...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tama-o-hoi In reply to House-of-Kadamon [2012-03-27 15:24:36 +0000 UTC]

why? for flight? all mythological creatures with wings only have them for show.
also, real birds with wings who cant fly: kiwi, emu, ostridge, penguin...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

House-of-Kadamon In reply to Tama-o-hoi [2012-03-28 06:39:36 +0000 UTC]

To my eye it just looks a little wrong. I once did a photomanip with a woman who had small wings... today I look at it and I think it's rather silly.
And no... Griffins fly, dragons fly, harpies fly, and if you are an atheist therefore making angels mythological, they fly as well. In future, please make sure you've studied your mythological creatures first before you say something silly. I will disregard that comment about real birds, because quite frankly that don't have anything to do with this discussion.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tama-o-hoi In reply to House-of-Kadamon [2012-03-28 06:47:53 +0000 UTC]

I know griffins fly, dragons fly, harpies fly and angels fly. But "realisticly speeking" they wouldnt be able to fly with the wings they have. Therefore there must be supernatural assistance involved. Ergo the wings are for show. To look cool, and mythical.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

House-of-Kadamon In reply to Tama-o-hoi [2012-03-28 07:03:50 +0000 UTC]

Here, have an e-hug. It's far too early for me to have a healthy debate with you now.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tama-o-hoi In reply to House-of-Kadamon [2012-03-28 07:27:08 +0000 UTC]

thanx for the digital hug. and my comment on flightless birds does pertain to this debate - my point was even if something has wings doesnt mean they can fly. you just assumed they could fly because they have wings.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

House-of-Kadamon In reply to Tama-o-hoi [2012-03-28 07:32:39 +0000 UTC]

Hon, if I agreed with you about you ASSUMED I meant and what I really meant, we'd both be wrong.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Tama-o-hoi In reply to House-of-Kadamon [2012-03-28 10:15:41 +0000 UTC]

just calling it like a read it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

House-of-Kadamon In reply to Tama-o-hoi [2012-03-28 10:35:18 +0000 UTC]

And we'll leave it at that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Yayashin In reply to Tama-o-hoi [2012-03-27 16:45:26 +0000 UTC]

Yes Tama, wings are like an ornament

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

House-of-Kadamon In reply to Yayashin [2012-03-28 06:43:44 +0000 UTC]

And that's fine, but if this sort of comment offends you don't ask for critique then?
I wasn't about to write a full out critique because quite honestly the image is great, there aren't any flaws, I just think it would've made for a more striking image if the wings were larger.
Or... is my opinion not welcome?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nitegrafix [2012-03-27 13:46:46 +0000 UTC]

So much realistic detail, excellent work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0