HOME | DD

zamolxe — The bad

Published: 2005-04-26 07:22:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 2402; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 204
Redirect to original
Description .:.

Linked with [link] and with [link] .

The good, the bad ... and the beautiful.
Related content
Comments: 25

PurpleGoddessShe [2008-05-11 18:02:16 +0000 UTC]

Awesome lighting and sensual posing! Her hair in the face is a sweet touch. :thumb17642257:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to PurpleGoddessShe [2008-05-12 16:32:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh you are a goddess

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

inspirit [2007-01-24 22:03:16 +0000 UTC]

this one kicks ass.
very sensual!
good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to inspirit [2007-01-25 16:02:19 +0000 UTC]

Double fala (double thank you? )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

inspirit In reply to zamolxe [2007-01-25 16:59:29 +0000 UTC]

hahahaha!! D
thats right!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

inspirit [2007-01-24 22:02:47 +0000 UTC]

this one kicks ass.
very sensual!
good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to inspirit [2007-01-25 16:02:02 +0000 UTC]

Fala (thank you? )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Caterpillar- [2005-05-13 14:40:11 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful breast!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to Caterpillar- [2005-05-13 14:53:05 +0000 UTC]

Which one?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Caterpillar- In reply to zamolxe [2005-05-13 21:54:19 +0000 UTC]

LOL which one?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to Caterpillar- [2005-05-15 16:53:55 +0000 UTC]

Well, you wrote "breast". As in singular opposed to "breasts".

I thought you only like one of the two, that's all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SGResu [2005-04-27 18:05:52 +0000 UTC]

You're so senxual

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to SGResu [2005-04-27 18:24:48 +0000 UTC]

I think it's the first time I read that word.

What do you mean?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SGResu In reply to zamolxe [2005-04-27 18:52:14 +0000 UTC]

Ops, please excuse my bad english.
Reading the dictionary...

"sensuous"...""sensual"..."voluptuous"



Not sure if the meaning is the same in italian...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to SGResu [2005-04-28 14:08:16 +0000 UTC]

Welp, the word in itself I understood, what I did not get was "you are so... ". Who were you reffering to ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

zamolxe In reply to zamolxe [2005-04-28 15:23:52 +0000 UTC]

Ah, so... I was hoping you'd say that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SGResu In reply to zamolxe [2005-04-28 14:45:33 +0000 UTC]

By your photo, the girl looks so sensual!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rekit [2005-04-27 00:44:27 +0000 UTC]

fantastic use of underexposure.. love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to rekit [2005-04-27 17:40:39 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! Do check out the others, as well!

You may like them. Then again, you may not.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mybittersweetness [2005-04-26 22:19:52 +0000 UTC]

I like more the bad ones... can't help it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to mybittersweetness [2005-04-27 17:39:36 +0000 UTC]

Wow, good to know.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tomclaessens [2005-04-26 16:03:39 +0000 UTC]

I really like the lighting. I wish I had the "knowledge" how to do those shots.. oh well I guess I'll just stick with landscapes until I have a dSLR to experiment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to tomclaessens [2005-04-26 19:36:18 +0000 UTC]

Uhm.. I'm lucky to be able to use the equipment I used, and grateful. It is borrowed.
But I think there is a lot to be done with a cheaper camera that gives you a bit more control (shutter and aperture mainly).

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

illenips [2005-04-26 15:22:46 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful. Just Beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

zamolxe In reply to illenips [2005-04-26 19:30:11 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. Thank you very much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0