Comments: 50
tomasito68 [2007-12-19 17:26:36 +0000 UTC]
great colors dude... did you have to adjust the colors on PS or as is? In my opinion Kodak Portra 160 or 400NC are one of the greatest film at least for similiar application. btw... great composition
π: 0 β©: 0
cougarr [2007-11-29 08:56:31 +0000 UTC]
She is cute ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
kamandir In reply to kamandir [2007-11-27 14:39:56 +0000 UTC]
ghrr
...didnt break
π: 0 β©: 0
Namelast [2007-11-11 00:18:33 +0000 UTC]
Great, works on so many different levels!
DOF, perspective, interesting pose, colours.
Good job!
π: 0 β©: 0
wizofoz2k [2007-11-10 10:32:26 +0000 UTC]
smidgeon less "purples" and it'd be perfect, maybe a touch of the "grey" balancer in levels on the dark grey rocks?
man: I just love 6x7 photos! nothing else near it
π: 0 β©: 0
zerocomplex [2007-11-10 05:15:31 +0000 UTC]
Suze is a moron, colors look fine, her monitor must be dutched.
I heard the new "in" thing was to um, fake large format slides and stuff, have you heard of this?
Ahoy, how is the career going? Making moments in Vienna must be a dream come true.
π: 0 β©: 2
Suzage In reply to zerocomplex [2007-11-11 14:53:42 +0000 UTC]
Shut up, or I'll go Hong Kong on your ass >(
π: 0 β©: 0
zort In reply to zerocomplex [2007-11-10 14:14:23 +0000 UTC]
oh, fake LF slides - sounds terrific! haven't heard of it so far but then again, i think i'm not post-modern enough for that kind of stuff. sorry.
the career is fantastic. the guy i'm shooting weddings for gets important letters from the guild, telling him to get out of their business and stuff. it's very precious and austrian. it's definitely a dream come true but i try to compensate with studying and jerking off.
π: 0 β©: 1
zerocomplex In reply to zort [2007-11-11 10:12:38 +0000 UTC]
Beating a cloud is very respectful nowadays.
π: 0 β©: 0
brightshadows [2007-11-09 23:22:38 +0000 UTC]
I love those colors. I don't think they're blah at all.
π: 0 β©: 0
SpanishJohnny [2007-11-09 22:03:32 +0000 UTC]
MF yes and RB ohh ! scheiΓ aufs kohle machen, ist eben ne seelensache. auf das 110/2.8 hab ich auch schon n auge geworfen - jaa aber der preis ! erstma muss ich die kamera richtig benutzen.
ungewΓΆhnlich pose, gefΓ€llt mir aber. sieht ziemlich cool aus. mehr davon
π: 0 β©: 0
gnato [2007-11-09 21:46:20 +0000 UTC]
format ist interesant, man muss sich drauf gewΓΆhnen.
π: 0 β©: 0
frere [2007-11-09 16:48:58 +0000 UTC]
sehr cool
π: 0 β©: 0
apixx [2007-11-09 12:08:21 +0000 UTC]
so scharf
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to apixx [2007-11-09 17:11:24 +0000 UTC]
nicht mal - der sucher war damals noch nicht repariert. hab ich nun mit etwas superkleber behoben und jetzt ist das ding wirklich wild-scharf.
π: 0 β©: 1
gsu [2007-11-09 11:08:19 +0000 UTC]
mediumformat is gay. you should try leica! great camera's. i heard they never break down!
π: 0 β©: 2
maxyme [2007-11-09 05:33:09 +0000 UTC]
if you want, I send you a 65mm. doesn't work well under 1/125 though.
still, would suit you more than a 180mm...
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to maxyme [2007-11-09 17:09:43 +0000 UTC]
65 mm sounds very sweet. what's wrong with the lens?
π: 0 β©: 1
maxyme In reply to zort [2007-11-10 00:10:33 +0000 UTC]
i don't know. I used it inside a lot and at one point on one shooting it stopped working under 1/125. like I shot at 1/8 and was (around) 1/125 all the time.
so I bought a 50mm instead. (I didn't found 65mm) and know it's on a shelf on my cupboard.
BUT it's a lense for the RB. does it fit on the RZ?
π: 0 β©: 0
joejoesmoe [2007-11-09 04:53:59 +0000 UTC]
Her legs are too close together.
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to joejoesmoe [2007-11-09 17:09:23 +0000 UTC]
be more specific. don't blush.
π: 0 β©: 0
un--expected [2007-11-09 04:15:07 +0000 UTC]
gorgeous, is this your girlfriend? you never responded to my e-mail. let's talk more about developers and print trades, and other things i'd like to propose to you. write back, later man.
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to un--expected [2007-11-09 17:09:12 +0000 UTC]
no, she's not my girlfriend. oh well. hey, i'm so sorry for not replying - going to do so right away.
π: 0 β©: 1
un--expected In reply to zort [2007-11-10 16:48:55 +0000 UTC]
no worries man.
π: 0 β©: 0
sonofdaeladus [2007-11-09 03:13:57 +0000 UTC]
wedding?
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to sonofdaeladus [2007-11-09 17:05:58 +0000 UTC]
hah, almost.
π: 0 β©: 0
apinrise [2007-11-09 03:12:10 +0000 UTC]
baah i love the RZ!
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to apinrise [2007-11-09 17:06:44 +0000 UTC]
it's a very sweet camera - i'd love to get the 110/2,8 but as it's quite impossible to make money with MF these days, i can't justify such a purchase.
π: 0 β©: 0
colombo [2007-11-09 01:51:39 +0000 UTC]
training for kill bill, the sequel?
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to colombo [2007-11-09 17:13:50 +0000 UTC]
perhaps. i didnt see a single episode of kill bill.
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to dlusion [2007-11-09 17:07:44 +0000 UTC]
oh well, not sure about the negatives. they came out quite dull, not sure if it's the scanner or the development.
π: 0 β©: 0
xtalim [2007-11-09 00:22:09 +0000 UTC]
what an interesting photograph : )
i think the soft quality of the background and way she's standing on the tracks make it beautiful ^^
π: 0 β©: 1
zort In reply to xtalim [2007-11-09 17:13:26 +0000 UTC]
the out-of-focus rendition of medium format is quite different compared to 35 mm photography... in a good way. its a pity that color film is so expensive here.
π: 0 β©: 1
Killshi7 In reply to zort [2007-11-11 02:27:52 +0000 UTC]
friend, you should try a large format bellows. nothing beats focus from seventy years ago.
π: 0 β©: 0
zort In reply to gONZOm [2007-11-09 17:12:26 +0000 UTC]
hah, actually, i just wanted to try color film with the mf-camera... and as that trainyard is quite close to my place we got there and took a few frames. glad you like it!
π: 0 β©: 1