AnselmBlackheart In reply to HunterBeingHunted [2019-05-05 01:04:45 +0000 UTC]

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY *Dies of old age*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnselmBlackheart In reply to WolfNightV4X1 [2014-01-10 19:00:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you ^^ I designed him over a very long time

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnselmBlackheart In reply to MinoruYutaka [2013-08-05 14:15:44 +0000 UTC]

hunterbeinghunted.deviantart.c… Scroll down to Commissiom Info

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnselmBlackheart In reply to AudeS [2013-05-05 06:30:02 +0000 UTC]

I deal with creationists, geo centrists, and even flat earthers... trolling is expected.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Deathan-Rain16 In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-07-15 13:18:05 +0000 UTC]

Wait... Some people still think the world is flat?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to Deathan-Rain16 [2013-07-15 14:40:40 +0000 UTC]

As much as it pains me to say... yes, yes there are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Deathan-Rain16 In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-07-15 15:14:31 +0000 UTC]

That moment when you can't fix stupid.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnselmBlackheart In reply to dinshino [2013-04-13 17:27:35 +0000 UTC]

My response to your link, is this link. [link] Be warned... it is very technical in some areas.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dinshino In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-04-13 23:26:08 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... interesting. I hadn't seen that before. However, they completely failed at retaining any sort of facade of impartiality, so they kind of come off as a smug. I wish that politics didn't exist within the sciences (they're not supposed to). We'd probably actually find the right answer beyond any shadow of a doubt if there weren't. But, they permeate every aspect of the sciences.

This [link] has nothing to do with the age of the Earth, but instead delves a bit into Dark Archaeology. To look at "the evidence that is simply ignored" for a field of science, just put "dark" in front of its name.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnselmBlackheart In reply to dinshino [2013-04-12 11:01:17 +0000 UTC]

Nice icelandic... you have now been reported for harassment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dinshino In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-04-13 04:27:10 +0000 UTC]

Hang on.
1) That's Old Norse
2) It means that my housemate has been getting on my laptop again and I need to start closing it when I leave the room again.


I take it you two were arguing, yes? (though he probably called it "debating").

I'm just going to have to apologize for his behavior. He's got Asperger syndrome [link] (which is the only reason I put up with him being that that's my diagnosis as well) and he has really shitty social skills. Really REALLY shitty social skills. It's something I've been trying to get him to work on, but the progress has been really slow.

Should I ask what you two were fighting about or just apologize for his behavior again?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to dinshino [2013-04-13 06:21:39 +0000 UTC]

So you are trying to convince me that someone who I had a 'debate' with over a period of over a WEEK... was someone who managed to get on your computer and you never saw the messages? Sorry, but that does not wash.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

dinshino In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-04-13 12:30:29 +0000 UTC]

Also, I have the little box in the bottom corner of comments checked, so as soon as a reply is made the comment is deleted. (It took me 4 tries to spell "Anselm" so I could add this).

The only way to keep track of one's comments on DA is to change the default in your personal settings.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dinshino In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-04-13 12:21:25 +0000 UTC]

1) I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm simply telling you what transpired. Come to your own conclusion. (Also, I wasn't actually expecting a response from you, but okay).

2) Shared living space. My laptop is typically in the living room at my desk.

3) I'm a human. I have to use the restroom and eat. And

4) This isn't the first time he's done it.

If he's done this for a week, I'd really like to know what you were arguing about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to dinshino [2013-04-13 17:30:49 +0000 UTC]

Alright, I'll play ball. [link] There is our... 'debate', started on the second of April.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dinshino In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-04-13 23:17:19 +0000 UTC]

I wrote the first two responses. But the rest aren't mine. If you'd like to compare, I had a little mix up over on the deviation in the ToyTime group called "God Hates Clones".

Jan (said "yan") got his first disability check today and I got to drive him to Walmart to get a laptop this morning before I went to bed.

The first thing we did after he got it online was make him an account.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to dinshino [2013-04-13 23:26:07 +0000 UTC]

I noticed he had a new account... he took that opportunity to go to a journal of mine and call me a twat.

Though this means that my refutation of your points remains unanswered, would you like to resume our discussion, now minus the intrusion of another who made some frankly crap arguments?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dinshino In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-04-14 01:36:12 +0000 UTC]

*face palm*

There's not really much I can add. I know it was the subject of Jan's senior thesis, but he kind find it. I think Dr. Moore still has it. He lent it to him last semester.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnselmBlackheart In reply to Honeybuun1018 [2013-03-04 10:42:24 +0000 UTC]

Aaaaaw, do you not like people checking to see when you stalk others?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Honeybuun1018 In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-03-04 11:09:26 +0000 UTC]

i don't stalk

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to Honeybuun1018 [2013-03-04 11:36:39 +0000 UTC]

Says the person who is going to another's page seemingly to keep tabs on what they have said? Considering you linked me to one of their journals, no doubt to bring up my comment on it. Said comment also being one where I list one of the times you looked on their page.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Honeybuun1018 In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-03-04 12:28:22 +0000 UTC]

LIE

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to Honeybuun1018 [2013-03-04 12:29:51 +0000 UTC]

Care to say which one of those was a lie? And then back it up with evidence?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Honeybuun1018 In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-03-04 20:26:08 +0000 UTC]

NO

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to Honeybuun1018 [2013-03-04 20:28:52 +0000 UTC]

Than I hold on to my motion that you are stalking the other users page.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Honeybuun1018 In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-03-05 00:42:25 +0000 UTC]

don't stalk..what-so-ever

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to Honeybuun1018 [2013-03-05 01:45:37 +0000 UTC]

Riiiiight. So why did you message me?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Honeybuun1018 In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-03-05 01:55:52 +0000 UTC]

not

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to Honeybuun1018 [2013-03-05 01:59:29 +0000 UTC]

I can report you for spam if you would prefer.... at this point I have no doubt you sent roughly the same message to everyone who has commented on that journal, which would constitute spam.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MamaBearShiva In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-03-05 03:54:57 +0000 UTC]

(( I actually have proof on my page that she admitted to stalking. [link] That gal is just lying once again

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AnselmBlackheart In reply to MamaBearShiva [2013-03-05 13:06:59 +0000 UTC]

I already know she is lying, but I will give her a chance to repent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MamaBearShiva In reply to AnselmBlackheart [2013-03-05 15:40:11 +0000 UTC]

((She'll most likely throw a fit that I linked you thing. Her own damn fault for being a liar. ))

👍: 0 ⏩: 1