JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-06 01:17:22 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-06 06:19:37 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-06 18:58:06 +0000 UTC]

When you make extraordinary claims you must provide extraordinary evidence. I will settle for links that state the things you claim are prerequisites for becoming a Greek Orthodox. Otherwise this whole paragraph is mere fanfare.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-06 19:07:35 +0000 UTC]

My late papa was a priest & Theology lecturer & I've met some of the world's top Orthodox divines + female monks. My 'guru' is Overbeck whose brilliant work on Orthodox Patristics you can see via godalmighty.co.uk. His work was on Leontius of Byzantium & he was a scholar at the Byzantine Institute in the UK + a big pal of Irenaeus Bisdhop of B'Ham/correspondent of the Archbishop of Novgorod ETC ETC You can probably buy his book on Amazon cheaply PS Oh he experienced the Vision of God fully

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-07 01:21:53 +0000 UTC]

>My late papa was a priest & Theology lecturer

that explains a lot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-07 08:14:41 +0000 UTC]

He's partly responsible for my early learning & my precocity but the entire outcome of me - the devastating good looks, modesty included, IQ 189, ancestry, beautiful physique & animal physicality - I must give God the credit for - it's THIS GOOD & gets infinitely better in Heaven [yowwwee I'm a spunky androgynous marvel - SUCK ME BOYS & GIRLS I'm very well endowed THANK YOU JESUS - i.e. - the REAL Jesus not the de Sade plastic-spastic retard simulacrum]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-07 15:48:31 +0000 UTC]

Wow, an I.Q. of 189, where did you test that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

JesusDeSaad In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-07 17:32:20 +0000 UTC]

Nope, different Jesus. But Where did you test your intellect and received a score of 189, pray tell?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-07 17:02:39 +0000 UTC]

It is, of course, insufficient & I believe they marked me down out of envy + rousting 3000+ other contenders was a piece of piss [you're not THE Doctor Jesus of oral suppositories fame??] I understand your invention involved swallowing the pill enclosed in a plastic ball, which had to be returned the next day for further uses?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-07 17:32:40 +0000 UTC]

Nope, different Jesus. But Where did you test your intellect and received a score of 189, pray tell?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-07 21:15:48 +0000 UTC]

PRAY TELL O you divine you! I didn't test my IQ aptitude thing, it was done in secret over 3000+ 16-21 yr olds - the embarrassment was I came first in every test over months [many were disguised apparently] which put lots of VERY important noses out of joint]. My mother said it's a mistake to expose exceptional intelligence cuz it creates enemies

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-07 21:23:37 +0000 UTC]

would you care to scan and post the results please, along with the indication that it signifies 189 IQ points and that the rest weren't just lazy?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-07 21:38:00 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure Mozart got shit in being asked to prove he whistled thru' his ass age 6 [his papa probably wrote his first Symphony & bribed accomplished midgets to dress up & play the clavichord] - I wasn't party to test procedures & it hasn't made my life easier fkking over the 'good & the great' - GENIUS IS HATED!! [that's one of the reasons swine killed Christ]. Oh the rest could have out-stripped Wolfie but they fkking lolled abaht-a-lot - pppphh!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-08 00:06:56 +0000 UTC]

that's nice. Ever heard of Occam's Razor?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-08 06:29:13 +0000 UTC]

I wrote a learned paper on Ockham & Duns Scotus & argued against them in a school debate. Ockham suffers all the limitations of any nominalist in seeing God as beyond man's capacity - this is a failure of knowledge about metamorphosis on his part & thus typically Latinist.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-08 09:26:27 +0000 UTC]

No, I was referring to his hypothesis that (to paraphrase) if you have two or more explanations, the shortest one tends to usually be the correct one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-08 11:14:37 +0000 UTC]

He actually said don't multiply your entities [this would I think be a normal reaction to reading Aristotle where terminology flying out of control is a topos] - generally, stripping away of assumptions is the idea.

God is dead is longer than God dead - neither is correct & the shorter is more incorrect [I usually charge £30 per hr for homework]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-08 22:00:09 +0000 UTC]

No, I was referring to this.

[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-08 22:21:53 +0000 UTC]

The principle was filched from Durandus but William used it frequently, viz: pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate = don't use plurality without necessity = don't multiply your entities = initial complexity increases the risk of mistakes in inference. If you've studied the Golden Mean in Aristotle, the false simplicity of his assumptions rapidly 'snowballs'/multiplies into untold consequences. I've checked your article v. rapidly & I'm pleased to note it is critical of the Razor in many ways.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-08 23:27:21 +0000 UTC]

Good. Would you agree that in practical terms the shortest answer is usually the correct one?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

JesusDeSaad In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-10 10:20:21 +0000 UTC]

You could go on typing and typing, polysyllabic word after polysyllabic word, but it still wouldn't matter. You see, I'm on to you. You're just an insecure teenager, trying to impress people on the internet to feel good about yourself, because you're too shy in real life. So you troll and troll and insult and demean and belittle, probably with a thesaurus at hand, and expect of people to lie you and think "Shucks and lawsy me, what a great person White Man be!"

But we're just humoring you. You'd do well to learn some manners, because you really don't get on well with others, and that's an even bigger fault than a lower intellect. I'd tell you to research some human dynamics, to discover that the saying 'no man is an island' is very true, and that each person is interdependent with others, and that there is a reason for pack mentality, but you'd probably take it the wrong way, because I suspect you were either bullied at school or totally ignored, and have come to hate your peers.

So yes, I intervened because you were being mean to people I know are good from first hand, and I know you didn't mean any real harm, but you should feel some shame in that, because they never harmed you or caused you trouble, and you were only being malicious because you still don't know how to communicate properly. And you thought you were facing another religious psychopath, when in reality I am not, and then you started spending your time trying to impress me. You got bamboozled. Hoodwinked. Fooled. Deceived. And if you think I was insulted or amazed or stupendously humbled, you are gravely mistaken.

If you wish to talk to somebody I'll be here. If you're looking for a friend I won't mind being one. But know that your shit don't fly. Have a nice day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-08 23:37:21 +0000 UTC]

No [this is Eubilides' Paradox recast - clever ain't I!?]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-09 11:57:05 +0000 UTC]

not really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-09 12:09:04 +0000 UTC]

how could you possibly agree with something so far above yourself? how vile is democracy in its downward proclivity ...

wasn't it Calvin Cool who said 'you lose' when someone said I've laid a bet I can get you to say one word

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-10 10:20:46 +0000 UTC]

You could go on typing and typing, polysyllabic word after polysyllabic word, but it still wouldn't matter. You see, I'm on to you. You're just an insecure teenager, trying to impress people on the internet to feel good about yourself, because you're too shy in real life. So you troll and troll and insult and demean and belittle, probably with a thesaurus at hand, and expect of people to lie you and think "Shucks and lawsy me, what a great person White Man be!"

But we're just humoring you. You'd do well to learn some manners, because you really don't get on well with others, and that's an even bigger fault than a lower intellect. I'd tell you to research some human dynamics, to discover that the saying 'no man is an island' is very true, and that each person is interdependent with others, and that there is a reason for pack mentality, but you'd probably take it the wrong way, because I suspect you were either bullied at school or totally ignored, and have come to hate your peers.

So yes, I intervened because you were being mean to people I know are good from first hand, and I know you didn't mean any real harm, but you should feel some shame in that, because they never harmed you or caused you trouble, and you were only being malicious because you still don't know how to communicate properly. And you thought you were facing another religious psychopath, when in reality I am not, and then you started spending your time trying to impress me. You got bamboozled. Hoodwinked. Fooled. Deceived. And if you think I was insulted or amazed or stupendously humbled, you are gravely mistaken.

If you wish to talk to somebody I'll be here. If you're looking for a friend I won't mind being one. But know that your shit don't fly. Have a nice day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-10 11:20:24 +0000 UTC]

O you are a meanie when I've dedicated my poem FINGERED BY DEATH [front page Journal] to you - you'll be famous in my Collected Works

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-10 15:26:14 +0000 UTC]

Well like I've said previously, if you're looking for a friend, I don't mind being one, that's why I told you what I truly thought would benefit you. However you can't treat people negatively and expect them to not reciprocate. That's either negligence or arrogance, both being traits unwanted.

As for the poem, I wish I could say I'm flattered, but I'm no great fan of poetry, and you even misspelled my nickname, so it didn't do anything to me. I appreciate the effort though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to JesusDeSaad [2012-03-10 15:39:20 +0000 UTC]

The pun on your nickname was deliberate: don't fret - I'll re-dedicate it. I don't cosy-up to anonymity, so negativity is to be expected. You're hardly a bundle of laughs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-10 18:25:35 +0000 UTC]

Yes well I'm easily bored of charades. Outlasting me in this sector has no great intrinsic value I'm afraid.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JesusDeSaad In reply to ephiekay [2010-11-13 19:52:49 +0000 UTC]

um, no i didn't. i just sent a normal message under a picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ephiekay In reply to JesusDeSaad [2010-11-13 19:56:23 +0000 UTC]

i responded to this !

ok cheers pal

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to ephiekay [2010-11-13 22:32:15 +0000 UTC]

um, I still don't get what you are talking about. What email?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JesusDeSaad In reply to SoScandalous1 [2010-11-13 14:30:04 +0000 UTC]

no problem babe

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JesusDeSaad In reply to only-in-theory [2010-08-19 17:11:37 +0000 UTC]

Least I could do. I mean, what a crappy move on their part!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JesusDeSaad In reply to Tsoun [2010-07-23 20:49:03 +0000 UTC]

Geia soy ki esena megale, prospa8oume na to bgaloume oso pio grigora ginetai.
Elpizo na min 8ixtikes gia tin kriti, to kanoyme monaxa gia xioumor, oxi gia na 8iksoume kanenan.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tsoun In reply to JesusDeSaad [2010-07-25 16:39:44 +0000 UTC]

diladi 8a satirizi tin kriti?
kai apo oti ida einai sta agglika?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JesusDeSaad In reply to Tsoun [2010-08-08 07:58:24 +0000 UTC]

de satirizei ti kriti, satirizei tis istories apo ti kripti. i kriti apla einai i topo8esia pou labainoun meros oi istories.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JesusDeSaad In reply to VelVetVorteX [2010-07-14 21:15:52 +0000 UTC]

no prob lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JesusDeSaad In reply to mstdesigns [2010-06-19 21:01:47 +0000 UTC]

sure thing, steile invite!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mstdesigns In reply to JesusDeSaad [2010-06-20 08:19:43 +0000 UTC]

apla kaneis eggrafh h apodoxh einai automath

👍: 0 ⏩: 0