HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| JohnFaa
# Statistics
Favourites: 5796; Deviations: 337; Watchers: 142
Watching: 987; Pageviews: 103680; Comments Made: 12498; Friends: 987
# Interests
Favorite visual artist: Mark WittonFavorite movies: The Golden Compass, everything by Don Bluth
Favorite bands / musical artists: Linkin Park and One Republic
Favorite books: His Dark Materials
Favorite writers: Phillip Pullman
Favorite games: Zoo Tycoon 2
Other Interests: Pissing off retards
# Comments
Comments: 2422
PersephoneEosopoulou In reply to Kajm [2022-01-11 09:44:27 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 0
ForbiddenParadise64 [2017-12-16 18:41:17 +0000 UTC]
Given you're apparently back and you used to support the following viewpoint, what do you think of this:Β
NUKING 'Toroceratops' -The master list!!!Any questions about why "Toroceratops" theory is not valid should be directed here. If you want to know more about it, just read this and if you have questions about Toroceratops or Jack Horner's other hyper-lump theories, comment here - it's a lot easier and less messy than asking me about it in the main page comments.
Q: I have heard that the Jack Horner theory about Torosaurus being nothing more than old individuals of Triceratops is getting a lot of pushback. Paleo King, what are your views on the theory, and what does the evidence actually say?
A: They are arm-waving. Horner actually has a pattern of doing this, it isn't the first time. Remember the βobligate scavenger T. rexβ? Every piece of evidence Bakker, Currie, Weishampel, etc. looked at, Horner basically ignored or dismissed or even denied β even things as basic as eye socket shape β just to preserve his precious theory. Later Horner confessed that he βnever liked T. rex anywayβ (h
?
π: 0 β©: 0
RemLezar [2012-04-23 04:24:09 +0000 UTC]
Instead of spamming you with 'thanks fer the watch', I'd like to use this space to say I always enjoy your stamps, rants, informative pieces about pre-Christian religions, and your arguments against the braindead hypocrites on DA. I hope you stay inspired, because it's always fascinating.
π: 0 β©: 1
electreel [2012-04-22 11:30:26 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the fave, Carlos I should have given you a watch before...
π: 0 β©: 0
Chimpeetah [2012-04-21 16:49:07 +0000 UTC]
Please keep looking at the link I sent you XD I actually provided links to statistical measures, lets see how she reacts...
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Chimpeetah [2012-04-21 16:52:05 +0000 UTC]
Again, screen capture them. Once she looses control, she'll delete the comments.
π: 0 β©: 1
Chimpeetah In reply to JohnFaa [2012-04-21 17:05:30 +0000 UTC]
Just look at her ltest reply....
π: 0 β©: 1
Chimpeetah In reply to loltroll82 [2012-04-21 22:48:19 +0000 UTC]
Oh the LOL's she can provide ! Check out the argument between she and I !
π: 0 β©: 0
Chimpeetah [2012-04-20 21:35:40 +0000 UTC]
Look at this , and read my argument with her...apparently sexuality was invented in the 1970s as wel...[link]
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Chimpeetah [2012-04-20 21:49:01 +0000 UTC]
Preserve the argument while you can. She'll block you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Chimpeetah In reply to JohnFaa [2012-04-20 22:01:34 +0000 UTC]
Well I have facts and figures to disprove her, plus I'm a college student majoring in bio and psych so I win anyway xD
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Chimpeetah [2012-04-20 22:08:13 +0000 UTC]
And that's precisely why she will erase your arguments. Download Quick Screen Capture if you may.
π: 0 β©: 1
Chimpeetah In reply to JohnFaa [2012-04-20 22:15:17 +0000 UTC]
XD You do it..maybe it can provide some new material
π: 0 β©: 0
Chimpeetah [2012-04-20 17:02:45 +0000 UTC]
You know, you and I haven't talked in a LONG time..now we just make fun of fundamentalist Christians then again that's just as good XD
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Chimpeetah [2012-04-20 17:15:02 +0000 UTC]
Well, I would like to have your assistence in some things.
π: 0 β©: 1
ReeD82 [2012-04-20 16:19:48 +0000 UTC]
lol look at this !! have fun!!
[link]
[link]
[link]
π: 0 β©: 0
teews666 [2012-04-19 07:15:30 +0000 UTC]
Your gallery = WIN!
Definitely adding you to my watch list.
π: 0 β©: 1
Krookodile0553 [2012-04-18 00:29:45 +0000 UTC]
Hey JohnFaa,
I have been working on a K-T project where two islands from Eastern Asia(based on Mongolian sites) and Southwestern South America(based on Patagonian sites) collided forming a landmass equal to Madagascar, Tectonics then shifted the landmass just south of Alaska. I read "Taxa at the K-T boundary" on Spec Forum, but I am uncertain of the animals native to the areas the Islands split from.
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Krookodile0553 [2012-04-18 00:50:01 +0000 UTC]
Well, did your islands diverge before or after the Cretaceous Thermal Maximum? If after, then it's the typical list for late Cretaceous fauna.
In Asia:
- Eudromaeosaurs
- Troodontids
- Ornithomimids
- Ceratopsians ("protoceratopsids", ceratopsids, several absal taxa)
- Tyrannosaurs
- Hadrosaurs (lambeosaurines being more dominant)
- Euenantiornithes
- Apsaravids
- Presbyornithids
- Lithornithids
- Titanosaurs
- Oviraptorids
- Therizinosaurs
- Alvarezsaurids
- Gobisuchids
- Therian mammals (basal eutherians, several metatherians, most promeniently deltatheroids)
- Cimolodont Multituberculates
- Varanoids
- Simoedosaurid Choristoderes
- Pterosaurs (azhdarchids, ornithocheirids)
- Allocaudates
In patagonian South America:
- Sebecians
- Abelisaurs
- Notosuchians
- Neovenatorids
- Titanosaurs
- Noasaurids
- Unenlagiines
- Unassorted deinonychosaurs
- Euenantiornithes
- Thescelosaurids
- Hadrosaurs
- Pterosaurs (chaoyangopterids, azhdarchids)
- Dryolestids
- Gondwanatheres
- Monotremates
- Possible metatherians and xenarthrans
- Meridiungulates
- Sphenodontians
- Alvarezsaurids
- Early snakes
- Unassorted lizards
- Several amphibian taxa like leptodactylids.
π: 0 β©: 1
Krookodile0553 In reply to JohnFaa [2012-04-18 02:07:44 +0000 UTC]
Yes it does,
For taxa present,I narrowed it down that descendants of Alverezsaurs, Oviraptorids, Protoceratopsians, and Troodonts due to the sheer volume of species I know of in Mongolia(most of my knowledge consists of Dinosaur taxa); however if there are others you can think of,and want to contribute, it might help to know that the climate is mostly Sub-polar, though the south is more temperate,and temperate rain-forests in the far south, an extreme mountain range second in height only to the Himalayas, formed from the collision(and is still colliding). Then Boreal Forests and an enormous Steppe/Tundra in the north. Anyways, Pachycephalosaurs were exterminated by the Thermal Maximum in Mongolia?
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Krookodile0553 [2012-04-18 10:02:49 +0000 UTC]
Er, no, I just forgot about them
π: 0 β©: 1
Krookodile0553 In reply to JohnFaa [2012-04-18 20:09:38 +0000 UTC]
In the original draft of my project(before the idea of an additional S. American island)Pachycephalosaurs diversified, as Ceratopsians can't graze, and the cold obliterates Ornithopods, Ankylosaurs, and Titanosaurs. Though on Spec, Pachycephalosaurs went extinct. Is there any reason why?
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Krookodile0553 [2012-04-18 20:16:40 +0000 UTC]
It was just to show that extinctions can occur for no reason.
π: 0 β©: 0
JohnFaa In reply to pharmmajor [2012-04-18 00:17:44 +0000 UTC]
Moar propaganda. If you are trying to convince people, don't use retarded misinformation.
Likewise, I don't care if you support Obama or not. If you want a theocracy, it's your problem.
π: 0 β©: 0
VianaArts [2012-04-17 14:00:06 +0000 UTC]
Boas! Nem vi que eras portuguΓͺs. Eu tambΓ©m sou Ateu.
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to VianaArts [2012-04-17 14:02:07 +0000 UTC]
Sou mais um misoteista espiritual, mas geralmente dou-me melhor com ateus do que com pessoas religiosas.
π: 0 β©: 0
Troodontidae [2012-04-16 20:25:11 +0000 UTC]
Since you like Swans, I thought you might like to hear this.
"Illinois man drowns in pond following swan attack"
[link]
π: 0 β©: 1
JohnFaa In reply to Troodontidae [2012-04-16 20:52:15 +0000 UTC]
I think it's horrible that he died, but at least teaches a generation to not mess with animals pop culture perceives as harmless.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>