HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| lorddelta
# Statistics
Favourites: 1449; Deviations: 22; Watchers: 15
Watching: 90; Pageviews: 7809; Comments Made: 831; Friends: 90
# Interests
Favorite visual artist: I dearly wish I knew. This is like saying "I think this person is the wisest person on the planFavorite movies: The Matrix
Favorite bands / musical artists: Oh dear...X_X
Favorite writers: Plato
Favorite games: See Favorite artist
Favorite gaming platform: No such thing. Retro browser games anyone?
Tools of the Trade: Genius Mouse Pen, CS3/CS2, Corel Painter 10/11, openCanvas, Gimp, Blender, Flash, FlashDevelop etc.
Other Interests: Photography, photomanipulation, painting, drawing, animation, modeling, web-design
# About me
Programmer, idealist, art-lover.Current Residence: Home Base
deviantWEAR sizing preference: Large
Print preference: Large
Favourite genre of music: I hate rap.
Favourite photographer: See above
Favourite style of art: Impressionist
Operating System: Quintuple Boot
MP3 player of choice: iPod Classic/5th Gen
Shell of choice: Terminal on Ubuntu
Wallpaper of choice: Changes all the time
Skin of choice: Blue
Favourite cartoon character: Don't have one.
Personal Quote: ">_> <_< X_X"
# Comments
Comments: 172
RomaiLee [2014-08-06 20:11:26 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the fav on (^_^)
If you're interested please follow my work as a cosplayer here: www.facebook.com/romaileecos
if you use Twitter: twitter.com/romailee
I would appreciate it (^^) If it's no interest to you just ignore it
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lorddelta In reply to RomaiLee [2014-08-07 00:49:25 +0000 UTC]
Sorry, don't really use either.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
lorddelta In reply to synconi [2011-01-30 07:21:40 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha, you're very welcome.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
KariLiimatainen [2010-07-26 17:42:35 +0000 UTC]
so much for the favยดs !!!
********* **********
*** nature is everything ***
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lorddelta In reply to KariLiimatainen [2010-07-27 03:42:18 +0000 UTC]
Mhm. I left some comments as well. Which you're pretty much guaranteed never to read.
But its more the spirit of the thing I suppose.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
KariLiimatainen In reply to lorddelta [2010-07-27 06:44:43 +0000 UTC]
I read all your comments,
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Bascho [2010-07-23 06:45:20 +0000 UTC]
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
lorddelta In reply to Chubby-Cherry [2010-07-17 04:59:30 +0000 UTC]
*looks for the "you're welcome" smiley, but is terrible at finding it*
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Tiffli [2010-03-15 15:47:44 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for watching me ^-^, arigatou gozaimas :3.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Janeathan [2010-03-10 20:39:30 +0000 UTC]
Look, if you want to manip one of my photos, all I want is for you to ask. Once you ask, I'll reply promptly and tell if you yes or no, and give reasons why in either case.
The issue that I had was that you didn't ask, just stated that you would without asking my permission. It bothered me. Hence the conversation.
And because you never seemed to understand my point, I'm stating it again. I want you to ask permission before maniping, expressing that you "will" manip the photo, or anything else. That's all.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lorddelta In reply to Janeathan [2010-03-10 20:58:01 +0000 UTC]
Understood.
I can see how my original comment may have been construed and taken the wrong way.
I do understand your point. I have always understood your point (I think). In future, I will be more careful with what I say.
In my defense, I recently got back on here after a long period of unuse, ~2500 unseen deviations. Going through them very very, quickly, I don't always give a lot of thought to what I say, I saw your photo, was like "oh that'd be interesting to derive from". I intended to compliment you with what I originally said, with the full intention of getting your disapproval if you didn't want me to manip it. But yes, it would have been more tactful to reword my statement as a question - I maintain the rushed nature of the comment contributed to its poor word choice.
I will admit I was taken aback by your rather vehement approach to the affair, and hence the conversation.
I will state this: Yes, I will ask your permission before manipulating, which was my original intended statement.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Janeathan In reply to lorddelta [2010-03-10 21:00:19 +0000 UTC]
Ok. I'm sorry that I was so vehement... I did misinterpret what you ment. Question marks are good for questions. XD
Ok. Just ask if you see anything else you want to use!
Oh, and you might not have noticed, but at some point in the conversation I said that you would manip "Firetree" as long as you credited me, linked to the deviation, and stated something like "normally this wouldn't be stock but I'm a special case".
So yeah. Have at it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
lorddelta In reply to Janeathan [2010-03-10 21:29:59 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I don't know if I'll do it in the end, though like I said I'll send it to you before I put it up (with the proper credit of course).
I have a lot of stuff I need to A. find B. put up. On the plus side after three days of straight DA I have completed my perusal of ~2500 deviations. My eyes.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
Janeathan In reply to lorddelta [2010-03-10 23:01:57 +0000 UTC]
Hahah SO MANY DEVIATIONS!
That's ok. If you decide to manip it and want to send it to me beforehand, use my glassbanana@msn.com email.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
| Next =>