Comments: 8
dmax999 [2024-05-21 16:27:53 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
fum316 [2011-11-11 02:00:43 +0000 UTC]
Cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tawnya [2011-11-11 00:44:15 +0000 UTC]
Based on German designs I presume?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rujero [2011-11-10 15:06:14 +0000 UTC]
lol i remember reading about this prototype. they were really grasping at straws weren't they?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Suki2025 [2011-11-10 11:44:16 +0000 UTC]
lol thats a sad prototype
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
truemouse [2011-11-10 11:03:37 +0000 UTC]
I liked this plane because although it was doomed to fail, it was a symbol of hope, when people looked to the skies and thought 'why not?'. Hell this thing even physically looks up to the skies.
Thanks for bringing this to DA. Nice rendition too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Anzac-A1 [2011-11-10 09:26:37 +0000 UTC]
The biggest problem with VTOL aircraft is that they have to be very small to be light enough to enable vertical takeoff. If they utilise a turbojet, thereby having more power than a truboprop (which is technically very complex and more prone to fail), vertical flight without stalling and dropping out of the sky requires a 1:1 thrust-to-weight ratio which is difficult to acheive, and ment that the aircraft were always tiny, slow and couldn't carry much fuel or ordnance. In the end, every VTOL design such as the Pogo and various others (most of them from the USA) was very difficult to takeoff and land in, was ineffective or simply hopeless in normal flight, and never made it into production. This is because the designers became so obsessed with vertical flight that little thought was given as to how the aircraft performed during a mission's most crucial phase; the part between takeoff and landing!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0