HOME | DD

bagera3005 — Convair XFY Pogo commbat by

#aircraft #fighters #vtol
Published: 2017-02-03 00:59:36 +0000 UTC; Views: 2588; Favourites: 41; Downloads: 49
Redirect to original
Description Convair XFY-1 Pogo

The Convair XFY Pogo tailsitter was an experiment in vertical takeoff and landing. The Pogo had delta wings and three-bladed contra-rotating propellers powered by a 5,500 hp (4,100 kW) Allison YT40-A-16 turboprop engine. It was intended to be a high-performance fighter aircraft capable of operating from small warships. Landing the XFY-1 was difficult, as the pilot had to look over his shoulder while carefully working the throttle to land.

Design and development

After World War II, the Cold War prompted the United States Army and Navy to study VTOL operations. It was envisaged to protect task forces, convoys or any fleet, even without aircraft carriers, by placing VTOLs on any ship. These fighters would be housed within a conical protective housing, saving limited deck space available aboard ships. They would provide first line of airborne defense and reconnaissance capability, before more aircraft could be scrambled to help.[1]

In May 1951, Lockheed and Convair were awarded contracts in the attempt to design, construct, and test two experimental VTOL fighters that would be suitable for use by the Armed forces. Although contract stipulations stated that each manufacturer have two fighters, each was only able to construct one, with Lockheed producing the XFV, and Convair producing the XFY, nicknamed the "Pogo".
[edit] Operational history
[edit] Testing and evaluation
The XFY-1's pilot entering the aircraft via a ladder.
In flight
Promotional photo for Convair

On 19 April 1954, a Convair engineering test pilot and Marine reservist, Lieutenant Colonel James F. "Skeets" Coleman, made the first tethered flight in the Pogo. The XFY-1 was like no other propeller driven aircraft before it. No previous aircraft with a similar weight, engine power, or size had ever attempted to take off and land vertically. For the safety of both the craft and its pilot, the propeller hub cover was removed and replaced by safety tether lines for the first flight, in case Coleman would lose control of the craft and would need to be tethered to prevent the craft falling to the ground. On the other end of the tether was another engineer, Bob McGreary. If Coleman ever lost control, McGreary controlled the winch which could be turned to raise the tethers to prevent the craft from plummeting to the ground. For further safety preventions, four security cables were fastened to each wing in case control was lost in any axis.

Throughout the next few weeks, Coleman logged almost 60 hours in test flights in the Pogo, and by August, the test was moved to outdoor conditions. On 1 August 1954, Coleman logged two outdoor test flights, the second flying 150 ft (45.7 m) into the air, and shortly after he flew 70 takeoff–landing drills at the Naval Auxiliary Air Station in Brown Field, California. The first conversion to horizontal flight took place on 5 November 1954.[2][N 1]

Upon later flights with longer durations, flaws in the design were found. Due to the Pogo's lightweight design, and the lack of spoilers and air brakes, the aircraft lacked the ability to slow down and stop efficiently after moving at high speeds. Landing was also a problem, as the pilot had to look back behind himself during a landing to properly stabilize the craft.

It became evident that even if technical problems could be overcome, contemporary VTOL aircraft would be flown only by the most experienced pilots. Thus, it was not feasible to place VTOL fighters—as previously hoped for—on every ship. As jet engined fighters approached Mach 2, turboprop VTOL fighter became disadvantaged with only half the top speed. Due to these problems, the XFY Project was put on hiatus.[4]
[edit] Later testing

Although a test flight was made on 19 May 1955, it again ended with failure, and on 1 August 1955, the project formally concluded. The last flight of the Pogo took place in November 1956.
[edit] Survivors

The Pogo was moved to the National Air and Space Museum in Suitland, Maryland in 1973, where it currently resides.
[edit] Specifications (XFY-1)

General characteristics

Crew: 1
Length: 22 ft 11 in (10.66 m)
Wingspan: 27 ft 7¾ in (8.43 m)
Height: ft in (m)
Wing area: 427 ft² (39.7 m²)
Empty weight: 11,700 lb (5,310 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 16,250 lb (7,370 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Allison YT40-A-16 turboprop engine, 5,500 hp (17,000 lbf thrust)
Propellers: 3-bladed contra-rotating propellers

Performance

Maximum speed: 610 mph (530 kn, 980 km/h) at 15,000 ft (4,600 m)
Cruise speed: ≈400 mph (350 kn, 640 km/h)
Range: ≈400 mi (350 nmi, 640 km) cruising at 33,000 ft (10,000 m)
Service ceiling: 43,600 feet (13,300 m)
Max wing loading: 38.1 lb/ft² (186 kg/m²)
Minimum power/mass: 0.34 hp/lb (560 W/kg)

Armament

Guns: 4 × 20mm (0.79 in) cannon, or
Rockets: 48 × 2.75 in (70 mm) Mk 4 Folding-Fin Aerial Rockets

Related content
Comments: 6

bobcatt [2017-02-07 13:13:21 +0000 UTC]

Cool plane  built one  in Second life it was  fun but  bit of  work to land..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArmamentDawg [2017-02-04 15:19:53 +0000 UTC]

Not bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2017-02-03 16:02:54 +0000 UTC]

That would have been awesome if they were seen in combat.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

researcher42 In reply to Midway2009 [2017-02-03 20:50:39 +0000 UTC]

Since, for a convoy of merchant cargo ships in war time..
A fighter type plane was needed to protect to protect them
that could be lift off of a deck of a cargo ship..

This is one concept they came up with...
HOWEVER, It was too slow and not practical at the  time.....

Too too long to take off..A bit harder and difficult to land....

An aircraft carrier needed a large crew of several thousand personnel
to run it....However, a carrier took about 15 months to a year to build. 
Too much resources to provide a aircraft carrier to protect a convoy.

Also, the jet age was in full swing and propellor fighters planes
was obsolete in the 1950s at this time...

It was not until late 1960s that the British came up with the
Harrier jump jet....
The US military VERY WISELY decided to accept this British made
design instead of the other jet hovering fighters they were
working on that kept running into development problems.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Midway2009 In reply to researcher42 [2017-02-04 00:16:19 +0000 UTC]

That would a necessary defense aircraft.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eltf177 [2017-02-03 11:04:21 +0000 UTC]

An interesting concept but unworkable due to both the immature technology of the time plus the fact even an experienced pilot would have had trouble landing this on an airfield - much less a small pitching deck...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0