HOME | DD

Becca5002 — WTF Webber?

Published: 2010-05-14 02:49:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 6115; Favourites: 87; Downloads: 18
Redirect to original
Description Seriously! Meg's character is utterly raped in Lloyd Webber's Phantom sequel LOVE NEVER DIES!

(SPOILER) For fuck's sake, she ends up killing the main character, who she was bffs with only 10 years before! WEIRD SHIT!
Related content
Comments: 93

menslady125 [2016-05-19 05:47:40 +0000 UTC]

What....the....Hell?!?!?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ThePhantomsgirl [2013-05-25 15:01:41 +0000 UTC]

wow

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Espanholina [2013-04-25 02:28:04 +0000 UTC]

i still can't believe that meg killed christine!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Adrainea9876 [2013-02-05 04:40:41 +0000 UTC]

NOOOOOO! I DON'T WANNA BE A WHORE! I'm a ballerina much like Meg. I'm scared.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Becca5002 In reply to Adrainea9876 [2013-02-05 04:52:36 +0000 UTC]

HEHEEH. Thank god you're not working on Coney Island.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Adrainea9876 In reply to Becca5002 [2013-02-05 13:31:03 +0000 UTC]

Yes I'm immeasurably thankful for that

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mrbillyjoebob [2012-12-01 01:34:33 +0000 UTC]

BEST. FACE. EVER.


At least "Love Never Dies" can make us laugh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlackStallionWoman [2012-06-21 13:50:24 +0000 UTC]

You know you're a bad aim if you shoot your bestie on accident.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NessasWorld [2012-04-21 21:04:43 +0000 UTC]

I think her descent into madness at the end gave her great depth of character. And jealousy can do some crazy shit to people. She can't be perfect, right? Plus, everything she did was to help her mother and the Phantom. She was just naive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-09-29 04:42:41 +0000 UTC]

(SPOILER) Hey now she was aiming for the Phantom not Christene.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AzuretheNerd [2011-04-01 20:52:17 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AnneCat [2011-03-25 21:21:15 +0000 UTC]

WHAT THE CRAP?

I was already against the sequel. Strongly. That was *before* I knew they did this to Meg. Whaaaaat?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

elphieofkiamoko [2011-03-15 21:03:50 +0000 UTC]

THANK YOU!!
This is, seriously, one of my biggest peeves about the so-called sequel. I LOVE Meg in POTO; she's sweet and curious and mild. And when I read the synopsis of the "sequel", I totally started spazzing.
This is character death. I don't care what anyone else says.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to elphieofkiamoko [2011-09-29 04:43:50 +0000 UTC]

Um.....have you not listened to the last track carefully or read the synopsis?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EntirelyInsane [2011-03-15 14:20:26 +0000 UTC]

Le sigh...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lexyan [2011-03-15 05:49:56 +0000 UTC]

What I found strange was that Christine didn't even RECOGNIZE Meg upon seeing her. You'd think that if they were so close, Christine would at least remember what she looks like.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to Lexyan [2011-09-29 04:44:08 +0000 UTC]

its been ten years

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spazzbert [2011-03-15 05:21:12 +0000 UTC]

That whole musical is a hot mess. Plot-wise at least. The music and staging don't seem terrible.
But that plot. HOLY SHIT, that plot...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Doodlinjaz [2011-03-15 04:57:29 +0000 UTC]

Why the heck did they make this? In the book the phantom dies! Now hes joining a freak show and hes got a love child with Christine! Its like he made this show to make those Phantom+Christine fans!!! This show should be takin off the face of the earth!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saraleaart In reply to Doodlinjaz [2011-03-15 05:02:22 +0000 UTC]

Because Lloyd Webber needed to milk his favorite cash cow some more. It's bad enough it's based on the book "Phantom of Manhatten" which Webber helped write, but he simply took the worst well-known sequel and made it worse. The man's lost it, basically. He was bound to eventually.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlinjaz In reply to saraleaart [2011-03-15 05:34:25 +0000 UTC]

Its so sad! He made some of my favorite shows! Oh cruel fate!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

saraleaart In reply to Doodlinjaz [2011-03-15 06:12:16 +0000 UTC]

I've kind of grown to hate the man over the years even though I still love CATS and PotO. He's really not that smart and he's very greedy. Love Never Dies pretty much proves both, especially all the effort he's been putting into it despite the plethora of negative reviews and the fact it's not becoming popular enough to tour in the US or much anywhere.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlinjaz In reply to saraleaart [2011-03-15 12:27:31 +0000 UTC]

Its in the america!!!! NOOOOO!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SilverBlood123 [2011-02-24 21:27:03 +0000 UTC]

Everybody is raped in the sequel!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-02-17 05:50:59 +0000 UTC]

Okay for one who has not seen LND, I'm gonna say this: WTF?!?!?!?! I've always known Meg to be jealous of Christine, but murder? Huh...love does stupid stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-09-29 04:45:19 +0000 UTC]

Well she was aiming for the Phantom. not for her bff

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-09-29 05:27:09 +0000 UTC]

Oh...Well, for one who hasn't seen LND, one would automatically assume.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-09-29 23:08:09 +0000 UTC]

yeah. I haven't seen it (yet) but I read about the show online so yeah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-09-30 03:00:24 +0000 UTC]

Nor have I, but the show seems interesting

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-09-30 18:26:53 +0000 UTC]

i know. i cant wait for it to go on tour. i have the sound track and i love most of the songs. and i hate when people just freak out when they find out that there is a sequle. and if they payed any atention to the movie of POTO then they would know that they had left a clif hanger lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-01 01:20:32 +0000 UTC]

The sequel makes alot of sense to the cliff hanger a bit...a tiny bit. It explains where Erik went off to.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-01 23:47:54 +0000 UTC]

and how on the grave it said " beloved mother" on it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-04 05:56:59 +0000 UTC]

Oh indeed! It leaves off in 1911, I believe,if I read it right

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-04 22:20:53 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I believe your right

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-05 02:27:25 +0000 UTC]

Hence plenty of room for LND.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-05 03:40:33 +0000 UTC]

yep

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-05 22:15:18 +0000 UTC]

I do love Beneath A Moonless Sky, tho. Leaves alot of room for imagination.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-05 22:27:11 +0000 UTC]

yes. It is really good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-06 04:33:10 +0000 UTC]

It was the one thing that left me mezmorized.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-06 22:53:27 +0000 UTC]

yeah. its a good song. but my favorite is "Till I Hear You Sing".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-08 04:31:55 +0000 UTC]

Mine is too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-08 15:39:33 +0000 UTC]

its just so beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-09 01:00:45 +0000 UTC]

It's like Music of the Night, but with a bit more passion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-09 03:15:26 +0000 UTC]

YES! That is a great way to describe it! lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-11 21:24:58 +0000 UTC]

It's sex w/o graphics

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-14 18:28:12 +0000 UTC]

i know.....poor meg

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-16 11:23:00 +0000 UTC]

Eh...*can live w/o Meg but okay, poor Meg*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-16 16:24:15 +0000 UTC]

well I was happy she got a bigger part and got to have more that one song and some more lines

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EriksAngelOfMusic22 In reply to Morgan-N-Wonderland [2011-10-17 02:53:59 +0000 UTC]

Oh indeed! But an Oh La La girl? LOL...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Morgan-N-Wonderland In reply to EriksAngelOfMusic22 [2011-10-17 03:04:31 +0000 UTC]

lol I know

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>