HOME | DD

chriskuhlmann — Sherolck Holmes

Published: 2011-03-04 02:18:41 +0000 UTC; Views: 1791; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 22
Redirect to original
Description When it comes to Holmes there can be only one for me (sorry Robert Downey) and that of course is Jeremy Brett. His sharp features, eagle like nose and his cat like grace and eccentricity is what I grew up with and what I will always think of when I picture the legendary detective.

Another image from my sketch blog: [link] This one took 1.5 hrs.
Related content
Comments: 49

Wolf-of-Malkuth [2013-12-01 03:25:00 +0000 UTC]

Ahhh this is marvelous. Wow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EmoChickSomeNumbers [2011-04-26 22:07:58 +0000 UTC]

Love love love Brett.
Love love love this drawing.
Love.
It's all around, my friend.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to EmoChickSomeNumbers [2011-04-27 11:37:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Back at you for the "lovely" comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EmoChickSomeNumbers In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-04-27 12:53:14 +0000 UTC]


Spread the love, my brother.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BirdStuff [2011-04-25 18:53:58 +0000 UTC]

WOW. This is amazing! I love the colors and the shading on his hat, and his features are great too. Brett totally = #1, and you've done him great justice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to BirdStuff [2011-04-26 02:27:59 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! It's good to see there's still love of Brett out there!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nemesis12 [2011-04-22 16:03:13 +0000 UTC]

This is amazing. And he is my favorite Holmes as well...followed closely by Cumberbatch.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to Nemesis12 [2011-04-25 03:24:06 +0000 UTC]

Yeah Brett is the best "classic" Holmes, but I really like the modern BBC adaption, too. Cumberbatch does a really nice job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cryptix23 [2011-04-19 23:24:58 +0000 UTC]

OMG he looks so fierce. And so pretty. You captured him beautifully. <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to Cryptix23 [2011-04-25 03:21:59 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cyclist74 [2011-04-17 05:23:50 +0000 UTC]

great job no doubt, but he looks too devilsh in this pic for me!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to cyclist74 [2011-04-25 03:00:43 +0000 UTC]

Yeah this is sort of the "opium den" Holmes!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cyclist74 In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-04-25 07:37:19 +0000 UTC]

o.k. verstanden! ;o))

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mskaulitzhood [2011-04-17 00:39:48 +0000 UTC]

The one and only Sherlock Holmes indeed! Nicely done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to Mskaulitzhood [2011-04-25 02:58:38 +0000 UTC]

I'm watching Silver Blaze right now

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rowlingson39 [2011-04-16 16:46:07 +0000 UTC]

Same here. well, i didn't grow up with him, but he was my first holmes and he definately is the best

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to Rowlingson39 [2011-04-25 03:21:22 +0000 UTC]

His research of the original character, ignoring the previous actors who portrayed Holmes on stage and screen, makes for deeper and more textured role. He really set the bar high!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rowlingson39 In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-04-27 16:55:10 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. Once he claimed that he hated holmes, but he was so dedicated, i don't believe it for a moment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OorusevenFiibaa7777 [2011-04-16 15:51:16 +0000 UTC]

Great! I love the texture that you used

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to OorusevenFiibaa7777 [2011-04-25 03:15:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I did the piece with Drew Green's Gouache brush [link] it adds some nice paper texture

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OorusevenFiibaa7777 In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-04-25 09:23:34 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome. Thanks for the link!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to OorusevenFiibaa7777 [2011-04-26 02:28:48 +0000 UTC]

Anytime

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nukkemestari [2011-04-16 15:50:27 +0000 UTC]

Nice texture and just... amazing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to Nukkemestari [2011-04-25 03:14:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I did the piece with Drew Green's Gouache brush [link] it has a nice, natural feel

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SabethaLamora [2011-04-16 15:31:06 +0000 UTC]

Jeremy Brett is the one and only!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to SabethaLamora [2011-04-25 03:12:30 +0000 UTC]

indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jossujb [2011-04-16 15:29:44 +0000 UTC]

Ah, handsome, so handsome and so well drawn <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to jossujb [2011-04-25 03:12:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, none can match his cat-like grace!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FluorineSpark [2011-03-05 01:31:12 +0000 UTC]

Have you seen the new Sherlock by BBC?

It's by far the best Sherlock TV/Movie I've seen other than the classic Jeremy Brett one. It's set in modern day London, the character and plot is roughly based on the original stories. The cast is really really good, with Benedick Cumberbatch as an intense Sherlock. Most of all, there's so many delicious ester eggs in this TV show that directed at the original stories, which makes it so much fun to watch.

I'd strongly suggest you check it out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to FluorineSpark [2011-03-05 02:52:37 +0000 UTC]

Nice, I will. I'll check and see if it's on netflix or Hulu. Sounds really cool, are your portraits of the Sherlock characters from a movie or show? I love the captions too, btw, you have an awesome sense of humor

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FluorineSpark In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-03-05 02:59:06 +0000 UTC]

They're based on the BBC Sherlock cast. I put them back to Victorian era.

And thank you for appreciating my sense of humor means a lot to me, since English is not my native language.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to FluorineSpark [2011-03-05 13:38:19 +0000 UTC]

I'll track down the show, I love BBC.
and you could have fooled me Your English is perfect.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

UndyingMongoose [2011-03-04 18:36:10 +0000 UTC]

I agree with you about Brett. While I liked the Downey movie, Brett IS Holmes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to UndyingMongoose [2011-03-04 22:26:50 +0000 UTC]

Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed the new movie, but as a severe departure from the novels and I think that's ok. Part of what I love about art is the reimagining of old subjects but it seems we all agree that Brett was THE definition of Sherlock.

btw, you inspired me to draw a mongoose warrioress dispatching a cobra. I'll post as soon as my new scanner comes in

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

UndyingMongoose In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-03-05 21:02:05 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.

That's awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jaqen-Keszvath [2011-03-04 09:34:51 +0000 UTC]

I agree, Brett IS true Holmes. Awesome drawing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to Jaqen-Keszvath [2011-03-04 12:43:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks and Brett and Hardwicke are the best team to date, I think. (me and my wife call Burke "crap watson" )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FluorineSpark [2011-03-04 02:43:44 +0000 UTC]

agreed.. only one sherlock for me! great work~ Although he looks a bit evil...LOL.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to FluorineSpark [2011-03-04 03:34:30 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I guess he does look a little evil...he must be on one of his heroin binges O_o

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FluorineSpark In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-03-04 04:46:16 +0000 UTC]

I always thought Sherlock was not that good really. His sense of justice was somewhat twisted, because he believe his judgement is above the law. He's more than happy to play judge and play with other people's life. He probably have some evil adventures that the good doctor knew nothing about.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to FluorineSpark [2011-03-04 12:39:29 +0000 UTC]

Probably true, in the Devil's Foot, he subjects himself and Dc. Watson to a possibly fatal experiment on a whim and lets the killer go at the end because he is a sort of vigilante. But if the police force was headed up by Inspector LaStraid, I might turn to m own brand of justice too, lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FluorineSpark In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-03-04 22:29:54 +0000 UTC]

Sherlock is a sociopath. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to FluorineSpark [2011-03-04 23:02:05 +0000 UTC]

Maybe that's why he "never loved"? hmmm

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FluorineSpark In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-03-05 01:18:40 +0000 UTC]

Probably. I don't think he's capable of love or other emotion. The book did mention he cares about Watson, but those moments are rare and far between, and most likely the wishful thinking of our good doctor.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to FluorineSpark [2011-03-05 02:49:16 +0000 UTC]

I think you're right (though my sister, who reads into everything like a /slash novel thinks there's more, lol) Doyal was a spiritualist and it's possible he writes in a little veiled critique of the "cold rationalist" as some one with great powers of observation but cut of from human emotions. Either that or he's totally gay-bones for Watson, lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FluorineSpark In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-03-05 03:07:25 +0000 UTC]

I secretly hope there's yaoi tension between Sherlock and Watson, or Sherlock and Moriarty. But I can never allow myself to do anything with it. I think Doyle wrote Sherlock based on a real person, this person might not be as brilliant as Sherlock in the book, his method might not work every time, but I do believe you can't make something like Sherlock up. He's so vivid and consistent in personality, it has to be based on reality.

After all, Doyle is not a good writer. His other works are not nearly as good. Even the Sherlock stories are rather simple and blank. It is the character that really stands out. Very few people nowadays read Sherlock Holmes because of it's story, there're way better detective fictions out there. It is the characters that make the work eternal. And these kind of character almost always based on reality.

There're speculations that Sherlock is based on Doyle's medical school professor Dr. Bell. Don't know how much of it is true though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to FluorineSpark [2011-03-05 13:54:42 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I know a ton of Sherlock fans, but no Doyle fans...hmm. I think you're right, there's almost no way for a writer of such limited imagination to create a character of such great depth without a model. It's like Robert Louis Stevenson, there would be no Dr. Jykll without Dr. Knox and no Long John Silver without William Henley. Great art seems to come from shared experience, drawing on experiences and reference points from life.

And on the yaoi point, there might not be an explicit romance between Watson and Sherlock, but Doyle was definitely in love with Homes (and the first person perspective is Watson's voice, lol)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FluorineSpark In reply to chriskuhlmann [2011-03-06 08:45:05 +0000 UTC]

Well, if you read into the words of the original stories, you'd notice Sherlock never approved Watson's marriage. He even went so far as to say "Watson abandoned me for a wife". I feel that the dynamic between Watson and Holmes is not friendship, but more like a very dominating master and a good natured servent (the original side kick...LOL). While Doyle might be in love with Holmes at the beginning it certain didn't last long. He hated Holmes to the point that he couldn't wait to kill him off in one very badly written story.

Doyle never consider Sherlock Holmes his great masterpiece, he started writing Holmes because his doctor business doesn't pay much and he needed extra cash. He always consider himself a "serious historical writer" or something on that line. He kill Sherlock off so he can be more focused on his "historical stories" (which wasn't any good at all). And because the overwhelming readers request, he has to write Sherlock back to live in one equally bad written story.

Poor Doyle... I think the guy who inspired Sherlock was probably dead or left Doyle's circle all of sudden, that's probably half the reason Doyle has to kill him off.

LOL don't get me started on Sherlock. He used to be my role model during college years. I wanted to be just like him, cold always in control of himself and his surroundings. It's not until later I realized he is probably either depressed, or sociopath.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

chriskuhlmann In reply to FluorineSpark [2011-03-06 14:21:24 +0000 UTC]

Wow, you really know Sherlock! The story of the books are almost as interesting as the stories themselves. I'm ashamed to say but most of my information about Doyle comes from a Houdini biography, lol. But I should read a proper one. Any recommendations?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0