HOME | DD
Corrupted-Garden — Lilacillians no longer a subspecies
Published: 2016-04-07 19:52:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 5542; Favourites: 4; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Due to certain circumstances the species has been sold off and is no longer affiliatedallotropes.deviantart.com/jour…
because of this they will be replaced with this concept i made a while ago skulifuck.deviantart.com/art/I… , thats all that needed to be said thank you for reading
Related content
Comments: 17
Are the traits for this new cutie species similar to Plant pOnies?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So THEN To the new species we have can we use them if we have pp rights?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i understand that they are no longer a plant ponie subspecies and i find that totally fine and dandy let the owner do what they want BUT they should not be allowed to take away the rights of lilacs from right holders since they payed to have that and yet go a resell rights for a bit over half of what plant ponies + all sub species cost i find it wrong and a bit odd they did this i am happy you found a replacment as quick as you could and i thank you for that wen but the point stills stands the rights should of not bin taken away from the people who spent money on them its like say a company made a toll box that came with a hole bunch of tools included say a new company bought rights for one of the new tools and anyone who bought them and take that tool from them but only let a certain amount of those people buy that one tool everyone would be mad and they wouldnt allow them to do that how is that different then this i am not attacking anyone im simply stating my point and issue with what has occurred.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
no one paid for rights to make Lilas. People were only allowed to make them because I asked if they'd want permission to make Lilas and I said that was okay.
They were not and never were part of the subspecies pack. permission to use the lilas was also given to new right holders because it wouldnt seem fair to not let them use them as well if the older plant right holders were allowed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
then when people asked for a list of everything else you get with buying plant pony rights why were they included or it should of bin "this isn't technically a subspecies but the owner of this species has allowed you also create them" and if your only buying plant pony rights then why include lilacillians if they were not a subspecies yes you didn't see them as much as normal plant ponies and other subspecies but that was the beauty of them they were an uncommon sight which made when you came across them even nicer to see but I feel like the right holders should of bin notified a bit clearer and before hand that's simple enough i just don't like the fact that there was so much confusion and un needed issues that should of bin seen and hand when you buy rights for plant ponies and it also includes subspecies a logical thought "okay so im paying for plant ponies and all these species" it should of bin said when it came to lilacillians "if you want to you can also create this species if you ask the owner" simple but when it is included in a list of all species included in plant pony rights its confusing and people shouldn't of lost the ability to create them nore should they of bin mentioned if they were never a subspecies but that's my personal opinion im not complaining im simply stating my opinion on how it should of bin handled.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
again. Lilas werent originally part of the pack that came with the plant ponies and youre only paying for the PLANT PONY rights the subspecies were just an extra since they were already there. Youre only paying for the plant pony rights and as an extra youre getting subspecies because we cant jsut sell you the rights and not let you use them while others could.
but Lilas while they were a temporary subspecies were NEVER part of the subspecies pack and were only added not too long ago as a permission I had given because others saw them and asked if they could use them too.
I dont know how else to explain it to you other than they werent suppose to be a public use subspecies to begin with. I only allowed people to make them because they asked and I just allowed everyone to use them bc i didnt see the harm of it. obviously. it was a very huge mistake to allow it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I already stated my opinion which would be same in this comment so I cant really add anything since it would be the same thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
like wise to my explanation. thank you for expressing your concern.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
your welcome but once again not complaining since you seem to think people are yes people are going to be mad when you take away something from them yes not as many people made them as other subspecies but that's what made them interesting they were a rare sight but people still spent time and effort on them and people who want to spend more time and effort on them can no longer do that that's what I find wrong about it I feel like it should of gone a bit differently plain and simple.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it could have gone VERY differently. but in the end, no one got ripped off of nothing because even if one design of the subspecies was taken away they were infact given a newer species and maybe a newer on in the future from me for compensation for whatever 'distress' i caused.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I would not call it distress more of a case of info being kind of not communicated right and understanding on both sides I just don't like the fact of people loosing that ability if they so choose they are very nice and I just feel that maybe the option of this is not a sub species but if you ask you may also do these would of bin nice if was kept
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So what happens if we have a Lilacillian?
Do we still get to keep them?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
//randomly shows up
yes hello friend !!
you may keep your lila, don't worry !!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Will you be making your own group for Lilacilians?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Good to hear, just making sure ;w;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yes you do as far as i understand from a friend who talked to allotropes
👍: 0 ⏩: 0