Comments: 89
ocelott [2010-08-03 17:28:20 +0000 UTC]
The lighting here is gorgeous. And I really like the hole-in-the-wall bookshelf. Neat idea, and great depiction of it here.
π: 0 β©: 1
WolfEyes226 [2010-07-01 21:04:38 +0000 UTC]
Your work is some of the most striking and original I've seen on here...phenomenal job.
π: 0 β©: 1
Pyz001 [2010-05-18 14:56:44 +0000 UTC]
..You are a god!This is SO going to my fav!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Pyz001 In reply to DarthFar [2010-05-19 16:26:27 +0000 UTC]
No,Thank YOU!! ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
Steffel [2009-12-07 14:16:46 +0000 UTC]
I'm now reading the non-abbridged version (yeah, you got me to do it) and progressing very slowly - Hugo's writing is interesting but also very elaborate - so I haven't yet reached this young man's introduction but the picture certainly makes me curious.
Awesome work, as usual!
π: 0 β©: 0
BenoitAubry [2009-11-28 16:10:12 +0000 UTC]
The perspective on the desk, the wall and the papers on the wall are not right. It throws a perfectly well-executed character illustration into misalignment. It's like you selected several vantage points.
Hands, facial expression are great, although you can blend around the lips a bit? Not so hardlined. I love the the folds and lighting in the textile. Reminds me of De Sarto who was also good with creating that illusion.
π: 0 β©: 1
DarthFar In reply to BenoitAubry [2009-11-28 16:13:26 +0000 UTC]
I'll see what I can do to fix that .Thanks.
π: 0 β©: 0
elvenmongoose [2009-11-12 22:15:21 +0000 UTC]
The colors and lighting in this is so lovely. Something seems off about the anatomy of his face, though?
π: 0 β©: 1
elvenmongoose In reply to DarthFar [2009-11-13 05:09:27 +0000 UTC]
That's not what I meant. >_>
π: 0 β©: 1
elvenmongoose In reply to DarthFar [2009-11-16 01:54:48 +0000 UTC]
Sorry, I thought I was being offensive somehow. You don't actually need to fix anything, it doesn't detract from the picture. It's that the view of his eye doesn't seem consistent with this angle, and his philtrum seems as though it's been placed too far forward. I could be wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
Evil-e33 In reply to DarthFar [2009-11-07 19:12:22 +0000 UTC]
You're very welcome
π: 0 β©: 0
kennyc [2009-11-06 19:58:29 +0000 UTC]
Great job!
π: 0 β©: 1
buckymcnasty [2009-11-06 02:19:35 +0000 UTC]
Excellent portrayal of the man- he looks perfectly deep in thought. Clever bookshelf too.
π: 0 β©: 0
FalconFan [2009-11-05 02:41:19 +0000 UTC]
I don't think a single one of your fans here (or anywhere, for that matter!) would complain about anything that inspires paintings like this, Far--digital or otherwise... Let Les Mis be the catalyst, I say!
This is so...emotional...for me: the warm softness of the light, his contemplative expression, as though his thoughts and vision are focused far away, or perhaps deep within... His hands really catch my eye: the pen, poised just above the paper, the beautifully arched fingers marking his reference in his well-loved tome--I notice hands a lot, since I have such trouble with them myself (and using your own for a model is a trick I've resorted to myself from time to time--it's wonderful when it helps! )... The folds and textures in the clothing, all the lovely subtle details in the room--it's all just marvelous, and really touches a deep chord in me. Beautiful work!
FF
π: 0 β©: 1
TheVikingGoddess [2009-11-04 04:40:11 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely fantastic, rich and vivid and engrossing and win. Well done, Far.
π: 0 β©: 1
FlammableWolf [2009-11-04 00:48:56 +0000 UTC]
Oh my god. This is so gorgeous. I love it. Several times.
π: 0 β©: 1
technicolor-werewolf [2009-11-03 23:13:18 +0000 UTC]
This...is gorgeous. And Feuilly is one of my very favorite characters in LM.
And this is a weird thing to say, but I'm glad to hear you're not making all the characters pretty-boys.
π: 0 β©: 1
DarthFar In reply to technicolor-werewolf [2009-11-04 06:16:23 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much! and I'm glad you're glad I'm not prettifying the Amis: stereotypically beautiful, flawless characters are my Poland.
π: 0 β©: 0
NatalieKelsey In reply to NatalieKelsey [2009-11-03 20:29:23 +0000 UTC]
PS He's ugly. And when I first saw him, I knew it was Les Mis (atmosphere and the ugly) but I thought it was Javert (because of the ugly).
π: 0 β©: 1
Dragonfly22 [2009-11-03 17:13:31 +0000 UTC]
He was not willing that there should be any man upon the earth without a country. He nurtured within himself, with the deep divination of the man of the people, what we now call the idea of nationality.[...] This poor workingman had made himself a teacher of justice, and she rewarded him by making him grand." What a beautiful and inspiring passage, isn't it? I think it's lovely to have a sense of nationality and of love for your country, and in a way, it's inevitable to at least feel alluded when they speak of it. Being born in a place and moving early to another, I think I sort of lack that, and I appreciate people who do have it. But in return for that, I think I've learned that home is just where you feel good.
Philosophic ramble aside, I really love this. I know common sense says "Le mis" it's more likely to be represented through traditional media, but your efforts of emulating it didn't go unnoticed. The table and the clothing called my attention. You fake the details damn well!
π: 0 β©: 1
Dragonfly22 In reply to DarthFar [2009-11-05 15:58:28 +0000 UTC]
Oh I didn't know you could invent brushes, that's the advantage of digital art, among many others. For instance, not leaving a huge mess and your fingers stained!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>