HOME | DD

xOxStarScreamxOx In reply to Gabriele-T92 [2015-12-09 13:48:27 +0000 UTC]

What's the right way to do these shorts then? This is as close to the original Looney Tunes that I have seen in a long time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gabriele-T92 In reply to xOxStarScreamxOx [2015-12-09 14:30:45 +0000 UTC]

The 90's shorts were closer to the original shorts, and even those where not as good.
To be fair it's difficult to get on the same level ad Chuck Jones, Bob Clampett and the other artists that worked with this characters. Even later Chuck Jones cartoons where quite as good as his 40's-50's work.
And, as I said, the series was boring, I couldn't watch more than two or three shorts, the animation isn't good, the jokes aren't funny, and the slapstick it's too fast and uninspired.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xOxStarScreamxOx In reply to Gabriele-T92 [2015-12-10 00:03:18 +0000 UTC]

I disagree with much of this analysis. The animation is on point, the jokes are hit or miss but when they do hit they're gold, and the slapstick is basically an update on the classic gags that we all know and love. Overall I think Wabbit (who's biggest flaw is to ONLY focus on Bugs IMO) is a great re-imagining of the Looney Tunes universe.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Gabriele-T92 In reply to xOxStarScreamxOx [2015-12-10 13:15:32 +0000 UTC]

Just a matter of tastes, I don't like it, I think they could do so much more and better with this characters. I do believe that their best use is in 6 minutes shorts, that's one thing this serie got right. I don't know I just can't seem to enjoy it, for me it's a bad show.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

xOxStarScreamxOx In reply to Gabriele-T92 [2015-12-10 16:35:20 +0000 UTC]

Fair enough.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

OmegaFastTunes In reply to xOxStarScreamxOx [2017-06-10 02:19:38 +0000 UTC]

Ins't Wabbit anymore, New Looney Tunes will focus in other characters like Daffy Duck, Porky Pig, Mac & Tosh, I'm drawing a art with New Looney Tunes characters

👍: 0 ⏩: 0