Comments: 65
pawelw [2007-02-11 14:09:29 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful work! Just tell me, how large was the image size? When I do projects like this I usually have the image size at 3000x3000 or 2000x2000 and it rarely gets above 500MB.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dinyctis In reply to pawelw [2007-02-11 16:30:58 +0000 UTC]
the image was around 3000 pixels wide, and veeeery big. When it comes to size (in MB), it just depends not only on size, but on how many layers you have (And i use a hell of a lot of layers!). Many of my works are over 1gb when fully opened, but about 200mb when closed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ExplosionAnomaly [2007-01-04 03:05:16 +0000 UTC]
Are there any tutorials, tools, or things that you used that you can link me too or tell me of?
I've always wanted to make things as realistic as this, and you've been my idol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LudivineDust [2005-06-06 10:32:32 +0000 UTC]
simple work my ass! how long did that take?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dinyctis In reply to LudivineDust [2005-06-06 11:08:19 +0000 UTC]
3 days give or take. Lots of experimenting. If i had to duplicate it it would take one day tops.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LudivineDust In reply to dinyctis [2005-06-07 21:13:36 +0000 UTC]
lol, its awesome, worth the time spent!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Galeos [2004-09-26 16:26:03 +0000 UTC]
Hi.
I would like to give you my 2 cents about this piece:
First of all, on the bigger picture, I say that you've done a pretty good job with this.
When we're heading for details, I'd like to point out that on first look the twinkling stars look like squares. However, when you take a closer look (with a Zoom plugin on FireFox ) I see that the stars are round, and what gives the squareness is indeed their brightness. The brightness is NOT square, but it resembles square and may be decieving. To me it shows that work was put in it, but to those who don't want to give a closer look, it might seem unreal...
Second point - I think that the colours you used for the nebula (excuse me for my incorrect titles, after all my english isn't perfect and is my second language) are pretty real and, from what I remember, look like a nebula in space. I'll take that point and expand it - Your whole nebula is real, with shapes and everything. Also, the background is most impressive (all of the stars), and on a side note I'll say that I have found a few stars that shape a cross
Oh, and I think that there is something missing... Not something crucial, but some colours maybe to give the eye a little fun, if you know what I mean...
But like I said, on the big picture I think that this is well done and impressive. Definatly a favorite!
Cheers
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chaos-syndrome [2004-09-17 11:11:01 +0000 UTC]
This image could almost convince me that this was a genuine astronomical image. The detail of the galaxy's nebulosity is very good, and the colouring and brightness flares are very well done. If there is a criticism I could make, I would say that the spacing between the medium-brightness stars around the image looks rather uniform, perhaps reducing the number of them might help. Still, it's a great piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alphaaffinity [2004-09-16 01:21:59 +0000 UTC]
Nice job...I really like the golden colors you used in this, they feel more natural than another palette.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
creator07 [2004-09-14 22:09:35 +0000 UTC]
I like this one better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
superkev [2004-09-14 13:28:01 +0000 UTC]
that's gorgeous, diny. i just got back from the cottage, where i had a great view of the night sky, especially since there was no moon that night. the milky way looked much like this, but not nearly as colorful. anyway, your space pics always get the imagination going, wondering what weird aliens are out there, looking back at us. nice work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
madbrainsurgeon [2004-09-14 08:22:33 +0000 UTC]
Ok spelling *write* and I don't know how to spell succint
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vissroid [2004-09-13 23:42:11 +0000 UTC]
Dude you are totally evil...lol
any better and you'll be doin picture perfect!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eilidh [2004-09-13 22:30:40 +0000 UTC]
my god, this is immensely beautiful.
Makes me think that this is what the sky should look like in actuality!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Novacron [2004-09-13 19:51:25 +0000 UTC]
This is definetly looking realistic. Great job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
acidround [2004-09-13 18:18:28 +0000 UTC]
I normally don't ask, but what was the original pixel size of the original? 2.5g is enormous. As for the piece, the larger stars look a wee bit too big making them look a bit out of place, but I tend to do the same so don't think that I'm negatively criticizing it. Everything else looks just wonderful, man.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Burning-Liquid [2004-09-13 16:41:45 +0000 UTC]
I see some very detaild work here! looks very good... a bit grainy on some places but overal a very good job here... +fav
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
comagirl [2004-09-13 16:38:45 +0000 UTC]
it's beautiful ^__^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
madbrainsurgeon [2004-09-13 16:22:51 +0000 UTC]
First comment *gasp* Is there gonna be a wallpaper of it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arescat [2004-09-13 15:41:46 +0000 UTC]
Well done, It's been a while since you've graced us with a piece of work that inspired so much awe... and a sensation of insignificance. That was always one of the greater magic's of your work, you manage to capture the vastness of space almost. It's beautiful, so many stars, and you can't help but think about ever planet for ever star... it's powerful. The fact that you left the planet out of the picture is key in that effect. With nothing familiar but stars, the viewer creates planets and worlds which are so much more comforting then the blackness of space dotted with distant places. A wonderful work. :applaud:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
burning-angel [2004-09-13 15:28:54 +0000 UTC]
very nice !
it's not a photo ?
great job man !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
psamtik [2004-09-13 15:14:04 +0000 UTC]
Ya, really nice detail, looks like hameeds work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
genocide-54 [2004-09-13 15:05:06 +0000 UTC]
Not such a fan of the colours but original all the same with some obviosly great brushing showing through.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lightsabr2 [2004-09-13 14:24:51 +0000 UTC]
diny, with a 2.5gb psd, i often wonder how much of you compositon is actualy not visible due to resizing down for online display. i'm sure there are details that you include that end up smaller than one pixle. once again, this is magnificent work, and i even like it better than your last galaxy deviation, enchantment.
on a side note, how big of an undo history do you keep in photoshop?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>