Comments: 55
frankrizzo In reply to ??? [2007-06-02 22:14:43 +0000 UTC]
Thanks again,
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
95101 [2006-01-09 03:08:49 +0000 UTC]
I like that type of grass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to 95101 [2006-01-09 05:03:56 +0000 UTC]
yeah shot in the spring so mixed dead and new
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
95101 In reply to frankrizzo [2006-01-09 13:04:47 +0000 UTC]
What kind is it, do you know? I was on assignment for the Tribune last month and I was driving through Bumblefuck, Pennsylvania and I saw a part of the field that reminded me of that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to 95101 [2006-01-10 04:26:06 +0000 UTC]
Green and brown kind?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
95101 In reply to frankrizzo [2006-01-10 15:46:52 +0000 UTC]
Really, I hadn't noticed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
crawdaddy79 [2005-09-23 02:26:20 +0000 UTC]
Superb photo.. Very detailed despite how small it is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jchanders [2005-06-27 04:17:59 +0000 UTC]
Since you went in landscape shooting - to call it that broadly - you have created great stuff (no fear, the other pics in your gallery in my eyes are very interesting, too). I am especially fascinated by this shot. The arrangement of it and the clouds make it just very impressive. So no hesitation: this is my fav for today!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to dewi [2005-05-21 15:47:55 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the great comment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AzureGuardian [2005-05-17 18:34:08 +0000 UTC]
Did you use the kit lens for this picture? I really like the drop off at the edges for this type of photography. Or did you end up putting that in later?
Thanks for all of your help!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to AzureGuardian [2005-05-19 01:23:21 +0000 UTC]
Post production. I am going to make a tutorial once I get another good photograph out to use.
There are two methods that I can think of.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
frankrizzo In reply to ki0o [2005-05-11 01:27:56 +0000 UTC]
Thanks,
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
imacker [2005-05-09 19:03:50 +0000 UTC]
simply great..i can't say more...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mikeoug [2005-05-09 15:15:15 +0000 UTC]
GREAT SHOT HERE!!!!
THE LIGHT IS VERY GOOD AND I DONT THINK THAT U NEEDED THE FLASH!
SOME LEVELS IN PS WOULD BE GREAT!
THANKS!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
greglief [2005-05-09 15:01:50 +0000 UTC]
EXCELLENT!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Intrigueme [2005-05-09 14:51:26 +0000 UTC]
I really like this shot- the sky is what makes the house have that sense of isolation and mystery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to Nik0 [2005-05-09 15:59:44 +0000 UTC]
yeah it does
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
True-RefleXion [2005-05-09 13:23:32 +0000 UTC]
Amazing atmosphere of desolation.
Very well captured.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to Deviluck [2005-05-09 15:59:12 +0000 UTC]
It makes a huge difference... Although I still maintain learning to shoot good pictures first then move to RAW because some people shoot crappy composed pictures then rely on RAW to fix it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to Deviluck [2005-05-09 19:59:47 +0000 UTC]
probably a good idea to look it up if you are going to think about it seriously. It basically give you tons of flexibility with images by allowing you the ability to change just about everything in the image without doing any destructive damage to it. Settings like white balance exposure saturation sharpness ect. don't matter as much because you can easliy fix them in Photoshop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deviluck In reply to frankrizzo [2005-05-09 21:11:01 +0000 UTC]
I see, well i hope to get my hands on a 20D later this year and i think that has the RAW ability. Sounds somewhat good ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to Deviluck [2005-05-09 21:28:31 +0000 UTC]
Yeah it does... that is a good camera.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
frankrizzo In reply to MarkGreenmantle [2005-05-09 15:53:35 +0000 UTC]
It has to be in the settings of the program you are using to look at them then...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
edblaine [2005-05-09 10:48:29 +0000 UTC]
nice! i can feel the wind blowing on ma face.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
youreinforitnow [2005-05-09 10:28:51 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic photograph. You've captured a great sense of isolation in the shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>