Comments: 18
Bobbishe [2012-01-06 05:47:14 +0000 UTC]
Meh, gimmie a MA5B any day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gods-warfighter In reply to Bobbishe [2012-01-06 07:30:35 +0000 UTC]
lol even if this at full auto drops a elites shields in three hits? and the 4-5th shots are the kill shots?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bobbishe In reply to Gods-warfighter [2012-01-06 23:01:57 +0000 UTC]
Blasters are unreliable. don't let the star wars properganda get to you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gods-warfighter In reply to Bobbishe [2012-01-06 23:35:41 +0000 UTC]
im sorry, whats unreliable about them? this is not the basic blaster from star wars, like i said add realness to these things!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bobbishe In reply to Gods-warfighter [2012-01-07 02:20:24 +0000 UTC]
But just think of the complexity required to make a coherent bolt of energy, and think of all the things that could go wrong. The more complex something is, the more likely it is going to break. I just dislike blasters in general.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gods-warfighter In reply to Bobbishe [2012-01-07 02:51:56 +0000 UTC]
ah, but a blaster is much more simple than you think, its not the blaster that forms the shot, the shot if formed in advance like a bullet and put into a mag for the blaster to fire, its pretty much a normal gun really
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bobbishe In reply to Gods-warfighter [2012-01-07 19:21:21 +0000 UTC]
So the magazine is a containment chamber? So what happens if it fails or gets hit by enemy fire? KABLOOIE!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gods-warfighter In reply to Bobbishe [2012-01-07 19:26:49 +0000 UTC]
no cuz they are still cold in the chamber, why are you bagging on something you know so little about? is your mind really this thick?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bobbishe In reply to Gods-warfighter [2012-01-07 22:33:54 +0000 UTC]
Then the shots are not actually formed yet. And I know about a little thing called "physics" that disagrees with you. The point is,energy weapons are not the best way forward. The physics behind projectile are well proven and will never be obsolete. Hell, even covenant plasma weapons are within the parameters of plasma physics. The physics behind this, are sketchy at best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kamon067 [2011-06-21 05:00:43 +0000 UTC]
Dang, this is good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ace854 [2011-06-19 20:11:10 +0000 UTC]
Which version did u make this on?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gods-warfighter In reply to Ace854 [2011-06-22 03:51:50 +0000 UTC]
eh, easy to use but the old has more stuff, i tend to use both really
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
IcyRage120 [2011-06-18 10:54:35 +0000 UTC]
i love this gun!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1