HOME | DD

hibbary — Life Bringer for the kiddies

Published: 2007-10-20 00:31:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 11244; Favourites: 274; Downloads: 122
Redirect to original
Description This is a kid safe version of my other deviation. I was loathe to just change the original, because the stark nature of the hermaphrodite was so pivital to the final image, but I also think it's bunk that anyone under 18 can't see it just because of a penis and nipples. So, I'm uploading the 'clean' version here in my scraps and linking.

Just keep in mind that this is not a woman, nor a man, but a delightful balance of both. :3
Related content
Comments: 72

loser-puffs [2007-12-29 20:26:57 +0000 UTC]


So you re-drew this, or you just erased the naughty parts out? Haha, I just want to know. I like this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SpitfireShepherd [2007-11-10 18:56:03 +0000 UTC]

I just love this. The look on the creature's face and just the pose and anatomy... I love the whole look and feel. A definite favorite.
You never cease to amaze, Hibbary.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jrocklolitamanga [2007-11-10 07:40:02 +0000 UTC]

... it's so peaceful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

illusionary-Angel [2007-11-06 00:33:21 +0000 UTC]

I truly wish I could see the other one, but thank you for uploading one that us 'kids' can see. That's really a beautiful picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sunfire-vixen [2007-10-28 00:32:57 +0000 UTC]

Yeah I hate the mature content thing, I mean, we see nekid stuff all over the media anyway, its not like I haven't seen it before. Regardless, this picture is awesome, I like the fact that you involved the "creation" idea into it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Toxicintensity [2007-10-25 21:36:54 +0000 UTC]

I would love to see the original of this!!!!! I am sorry you had to remove your work for the sake of people's own personal fears.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Si-chan [2007-10-23 01:31:08 +0000 UTC]

Wow, the "kid friendly" version really doesn't portray the same tone and meaning and emotion as the original. Without the penis, you really can't tell its supposed to be neither a male nor a female, especially since you only have the breasts. I like the original a lot better.

Whatever the new rule is, it sucks if it would make artists edit their art so much just so everyone can view it. The human body is an artistic and beautiful thing and its a shame that even in an artistic atmosphere like this people STILL want to hide it. Its not like its even showing anything sexual...

Anyway, sorry for rambling on your comment section. You do wonderful art, keep up the good work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lady-mo0se [2007-10-22 20:39:55 +0000 UTC]

Wow, this is so beautiful! Thanks for putting this version up! I'm glad I didn't miss it just because I'm a whole year and three months under 18. This is lovely! I just adore your art! I only wish I could see the original version...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

myuutsuCMCE [2007-10-22 19:18:16 +0000 UTC]

Wow so beatiful scene!
From which book did you took this idea! It's so great..!
Did you have to "re-draw" others arts to show it to every ages?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

emobutterfly16 [2007-10-22 17:11:59 +0000 UTC]

wow

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rave-cat [2007-10-21 21:32:00 +0000 UTC]

this was very considerate of you, and again, its beautiful, either way.
although the penis gives a little bit more originality.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Splatterpus [2007-10-21 02:21:25 +0000 UTC]

I was FURIOUS when a few days ago, I signed in and could no longer view art with the mature content filter on. Does DA honestly expect me to wait 3 years to see it? It's positively stupid. This isn't pornography, it's ART. Would they dare to censor Michelangelo's David because the figure lacks a leaf to cover himself up? It's silly. *fumes*

Did DA even explain why? I couldn't find a link anywhere, although I expect that's because I tend not to notice things like that. xD

But enough ranting from me, this really is a beautiful piece. :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Slipping-Star In reply to Splatterpus [2007-10-21 16:43:51 +0000 UTC]

it's because of all the sucky parents. They sue DA cuz they walk in on their 2 year old (who learned how to type in their big brother's password! ) who's looking at some porn and the parent goes 'What are you looking at?!' the the two year old goes 'Don't worry, mommy, it's art!' ~ quote from Navonator's journal

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Splatterpus In reply to Slipping-Star [2007-10-22 03:46:30 +0000 UTC]

Oh well. Best those 2 year olds start getting desensitized now, right? Soon they'll be ready for the words mommy uses when she drops a hammer on her toe!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Slipping-Star In reply to Splatterpus [2007-10-26 20:50:12 +0000 UTC]

LOL!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ObsidianPyre [2007-10-21 02:01:51 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for this. x_X I can't stand that it won't let me look at art anymore because of my age.

It's lovely, by the way, and I wish I could see the final version.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

solemnwar [2007-10-21 01:24:08 +0000 UTC]

Seeing as how we end up seeing what a penis, vagina, nipple, etc looks like in (at the very least) grade 5 health class, I don't see why it's such a big deal ._.

And you know. I'm a girl. I see my breasts in the mirror. WOAH SHIT. I SEE MY BOOBS. I AM SO OFFENDED BY MYSELF! >_> *grumbles*

8 and a bit months... just 8 and a bit months! ><;

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mi-san [2007-10-20 22:00:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for taking the time to edit this so others can see it.
This is a really spectacular piece. I like the whole idea in general as well. I'm sure it looks better with the penis and nipples, but this is really awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BenTheFobbix [2007-10-20 21:05:45 +0000 UTC]

like this one better. seems more motherly this way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Spartan021 [2007-10-20 19:32:09 +0000 UTC]

damn new rules >.>
Anywho AWESOME pic!
sorry you hads to edit it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kitsuneko-xenon [2007-10-20 19:09:22 +0000 UTC]

I really hate that you have to edit it for us to be able to see it, but thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Stormchaser-Thorne [2007-10-20 19:08:32 +0000 UTC]

thanks for uploading this version, beautiful work as ever i hate the new mature content rules, means i can't see a couple of my own deviations...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MerinkArt [2007-10-20 19:01:14 +0000 UTC]

sux being a kiddie, awesome pic, wish i could see the uncensured version

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dark-Chest-of-Wonder [2007-10-20 18:50:29 +0000 UTC]

This is really beautiful!! The expressions and the feel of this is so sad, you did an amazing job on this (im going to go make a second dev account where i lie about my age so I can see mature stuff *shhh* don't tell anyone! lol)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lilclepto [2007-10-20 17:49:21 +0000 UTC]

thanks so much for being one of the considerate people and caring about us under-18-year-olds who still appreciate good art! no matter the amount of blood or lack of clothes! I guess it's hard for the 40 somethings who run this site to understand that real artists (no matter what age) can be mature and see the symbolism in art, and most artists dont just draw a picture of something naked for the hell of it, they have layers of symbolism behind it.

Like your, the life giver being a hermaphrodite, Both a male and a female, it symbolizes the unity of Man and woman to create life, or the fact that a "deity" would have to have both male and female characteristics to be a creator.

lol well that's just what it means so me, I'm still sad I cant see the original. but the art is beautiful either way!

<3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Simbamarasa [2007-10-20 17:33:39 +0000 UTC]

yes. we must never show the kids the organz. might give them "ideas". can't have that.
i like the other one better.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fireextinquisher [2007-10-20 15:16:53 +0000 UTC]

Have they really changed the rules? Grrr. So I have to wait 2yrs to see this the way you intended it to be seen!

This version is great anyhow =]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CarsInMotion [2007-10-20 15:03:11 +0000 UTC]

2 Months!! God 2 months and then I can see my OWN deviations again u_u I want to see the real one in all its glory.
It is a disgrace that under 18's can't see your real art. It's like... putting up a segment of an image rather than the whole thing.
There is emotion and meaning that is lost through having to "censor" your art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

onlyevier [2007-10-20 14:27:20 +0000 UTC]

yes, thanks for that.

(the new rules aggravate me so much!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Blazer-Flamewing [2007-10-20 14:23:51 +0000 UTC]

I faved the mature version anyway, regardless of the fact that i can't see it
you should put the stamp in my newest journal in yours to spread the message!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Trinity-Infinity [2007-10-20 11:19:32 +0000 UTC]

thanks! really lovely! we have a hemaphrodite in our school play....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GoreDraken [2007-10-20 11:10:21 +0000 UTC]

Wow. So good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Keylly [2007-10-20 09:40:52 +0000 UTC]

very beautiful!!!!!!! unfortunatelly though i cant see the "life bringer" (your other deviation) cause i am younger than 18
can you send it by email? (ioanna-pin@hotmail.com)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jennyfire13 [2007-10-20 07:25:40 +0000 UTC]

Actually I really like both. I like the concept of the "adult version" as being a balanced mixture of both sexes, and really just overall, this is a pretty beautiful peice, reguardless!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

equinox91 [2007-10-20 06:24:12 +0000 UTC]

I love the beauty of the concept of the 'life bringer' you have here and the tenderness of the being's gaze as it brings the smaller creature to its first breath. I'm rather disappointed that I can't see the 'mature' version, but thanks for putting up a 'clean' one for all of us minors! ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jack--of--blades [2007-10-20 05:44:53 +0000 UTC]

I don't think you should have to mature content the other one. Its not porn, its art. It becomes porn when the subject is in a position that is considered sexual

But I think both are amazing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KiyaHyuuga [2007-10-20 05:15:13 +0000 UTC]

thank you, damn DA Put it up recently.... it pissed me off so bad

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KtSeery [2007-10-20 04:57:48 +0000 UTC]

i appreciate it... i wish i could see it.... stupid dA did that.... im pissed cause im not an idiot with the MC thing... i think it's art not porn. plus its not like people over 13 HAVEN'T seen the human body. anyone scared of the human body... probably has issues.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PapaTez01 [2007-10-20 04:45:16 +0000 UTC]

It is bunk. It's not porn

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

draconiangem [2007-10-20 04:35:34 +0000 UTC]

Wasn't there a time when "mature" content was classified simply as a form of pornographic material, such as sexually suggested items... now it's anything depicting any natural body part, scientific, figure/art or otherwise. Next thing you know, they will be putting tape over old Greek statues and blurring out books and posters is the science labs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pyonchitchi [2007-10-20 04:16:08 +0000 UTC]

Neh, you could just tell the kiddies to go log out and press download. There's no reason to complain.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

daanzi [2007-10-20 03:28:06 +0000 UTC]

I'm so sorry that you had to edit the image in order to show younger viewers this piece. I love your concept behind the original. I understand where they are coming from with the rule, but its totally not fair in cases of actual tasteful artistic nude... O.o i dont really think the genitalia is going to melt your eyes/brain if you arent quite eighteen. OMGPENIS*DIE*

Its not fair that not everyone is able to see it the way you intended. Though, of course... this version is absolutely just as stunning. I hate to see you forced to edit your ideas (though it fills me with glee that you care enough about your fans to edit it so everyone has a chance to enjoy your beautiful work, either way)

<3 love both versions mah dear.... do you plan on coloring it someday? *hopes she didnt overlook you answering that in the descriptions for some reason*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xXZuriMoonXx [2007-10-20 03:05:14 +0000 UTC]

look how you removed the nipples and the penis

its a beautiful piece either way we look at it though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

qwerty1198 [2007-10-20 03:04:27 +0000 UTC]

yeah, they changed it so that people under 18 cant see mature images! > that is so bogus!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lostinfog88 [2007-10-20 02:59:50 +0000 UTC]

Wonderfully imaginative. I love it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ocean-Fitheach [2007-10-20 02:52:48 +0000 UTC]

kid friendly versions always bugged me... I mean, what's wrong with the human body, anyways? And besides, what is really changed by hiding the nipples? Seriously. That Spears video where she's wearing like nothing but there are stars over her nipples... how does that change anything?

but ya... I never understood it. My parents are the good kind - the kind that answer all the questions without getting all awkward and don't care when I see a statue of a naked person no matter what my age is. So when I went to the art gallery and all the kids made a huge deal out of everything, I could never understand. Teacher once saw me admiring a statue rather than freaking out about it and asked me what I saw that the rest of them didn't - I shrugged and said it was a person, and it must have been hard to do in copper, and I didn't know why the rest of them couldn't just see it's amazingness.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SolangeFoxheart [2007-10-20 02:36:16 +0000 UTC]

I can't see the other one, so I'm glad you posted this! Ah, beautiful, especially the fur (love the fur.) And the hermaphroditeness, of course.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sporks-machete [2007-10-20 02:33:30 +0000 UTC]

Stunning.
Your work never ceases to amaze me in its detail and quality.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KiraKiraStudio [2007-10-20 02:32:42 +0000 UTC]

I'm faving them both right now. The posture is so serene, almost relaxing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dipp [2007-10-20 02:21:17 +0000 UTC]

this is very thoughtful of you to do :]

thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>