Comments: 72
illusionary-Angel [2007-11-06 00:33:21 +0000 UTC]
I truly wish I could see the other one, but thank you for uploading one that us 'kids' can see. That's really a beautiful picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sunfire-vixen [2007-10-28 00:32:57 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I hate the mature content thing, I mean, we see nekid stuff all over the media anyway, its not like I haven't seen it before. Regardless, this picture is awesome, I like the fact that you involved the "creation" idea into it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Toxicintensity [2007-10-25 21:36:54 +0000 UTC]
I would love to see the original of this!!!!! I am sorry you had to remove your work for the sake of people's own personal fears.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Si-chan [2007-10-23 01:31:08 +0000 UTC]
Wow, the "kid friendly" version really doesn't portray the same tone and meaning and emotion as the original. Without the penis, you really can't tell its supposed to be neither a male nor a female, especially since you only have the breasts. I like the original a lot better.
Whatever the new rule is, it sucks if it would make artists edit their art so much just so everyone can view it. The human body is an artistic and beautiful thing and its a shame that even in an artistic atmosphere like this people STILL want to hide it. Its not like its even showing anything sexual...
Anyway, sorry for rambling on your comment section. You do wonderful art, keep up the good work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lady-mo0se [2007-10-22 20:39:55 +0000 UTC]
Wow, this is so beautiful! Thanks for putting this version up! I'm glad I didn't miss it just because I'm a whole year and three months under 18. This is lovely! I just adore your art! I only wish I could see the original version...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Splatterpus [2007-10-21 02:21:25 +0000 UTC]
I was FURIOUS when a few days ago, I signed in and could no longer view art with the mature content filter on. Does DA honestly expect me to wait 3 years to see it? It's positively stupid. This isn't pornography, it's ART. Would they dare to censor Michelangelo's David because the figure lacks a leaf to cover himself up? It's silly. *fumes*
Did DA even explain why? I couldn't find a link anywhere, although I expect that's because I tend not to notice things like that. xD
But enough ranting from me, this really is a beautiful piece. :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Splatterpus In reply to Slipping-Star [2007-10-22 03:46:30 +0000 UTC]
Oh well. Best those 2 year olds start getting desensitized now, right? Soon they'll be ready for the words mommy uses when she drops a hammer on her toe!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
solemnwar [2007-10-21 01:24:08 +0000 UTC]
Seeing as how we end up seeing what a penis, vagina, nipple, etc looks like in (at the very least) grade 5 health class, I don't see why it's such a big deal ._.
And you know. I'm a girl. I see my breasts in the mirror. WOAH SHIT. I SEE MY BOOBS. I AM SO OFFENDED BY MYSELF! >_> *grumbles*
8 and a bit months... just 8 and a bit months! ><;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BenTheFobbix [2007-10-20 21:05:45 +0000 UTC]
like this one better. seems more motherly this way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Spartan021 [2007-10-20 19:32:09 +0000 UTC]
damn new rules >.>
Anywho AWESOME pic!
sorry you hads to edit it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MerinkArt [2007-10-20 19:01:14 +0000 UTC]
sux being a kiddie, awesome pic, wish i could see the uncensured version
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Simbamarasa [2007-10-20 17:33:39 +0000 UTC]
yes. we must never show the kids the organz. might give them "ideas". can't have that.
i like the other one better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fireextinquisher [2007-10-20 15:16:53 +0000 UTC]
Have they really changed the rules? Grrr. So I have to wait 2yrs to see this the way you intended it to be seen!
This version is great anyhow =]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
onlyevier [2007-10-20 14:27:20 +0000 UTC]
yes, thanks for that.
(the new rules aggravate me so much!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Blazer-Flamewing [2007-10-20 14:23:51 +0000 UTC]
I faved the mature version anyway, regardless of the fact that i can't see it
you should put the stamp in my newest journal in yours to spread the message!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Trinity-Infinity [2007-10-20 11:19:32 +0000 UTC]
thanks! really lovely! we have a hemaphrodite in our school play....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GoreDraken [2007-10-20 11:10:21 +0000 UTC]
Wow. So good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jennyfire13 [2007-10-20 07:25:40 +0000 UTC]
Actually I really like both. I like the concept of the "adult version" as being a balanced mixture of both sexes, and really just overall, this is a pretty beautiful peice, reguardless!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
equinox91 [2007-10-20 06:24:12 +0000 UTC]
I love the beauty of the concept of the 'life bringer' you have here and the tenderness of the being's gaze as it brings the smaller creature to its first breath. I'm rather disappointed that I can't see the 'mature' version, but thanks for putting up a 'clean' one for all of us minors! ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KiyaHyuuga [2007-10-20 05:15:13 +0000 UTC]
thank you, damn DA Put it up recently.... it pissed me off so bad
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KtSeery [2007-10-20 04:57:48 +0000 UTC]
i appreciate it... i wish i could see it.... stupid dA did that.... im pissed cause im not an idiot with the MC thing... i think it's art not porn. plus its not like people over 13 HAVEN'T seen the human body. anyone scared of the human body... probably has issues.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PapaTez01 [2007-10-20 04:45:16 +0000 UTC]
It is bunk. It's not porn
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
draconiangem [2007-10-20 04:35:34 +0000 UTC]
Wasn't there a time when "mature" content was classified simply as a form of pornographic material, such as sexually suggested items... now it's anything depicting any natural body part, scientific, figure/art or otherwise. Next thing you know, they will be putting tape over old Greek statues and blurring out books and posters is the science labs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pyonchitchi [2007-10-20 04:16:08 +0000 UTC]
Neh, you could just tell the kiddies to go log out and press download. There's no reason to complain.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
daanzi [2007-10-20 03:28:06 +0000 UTC]
I'm so sorry that you had to edit the image in order to show younger viewers this piece. I love your concept behind the original. I understand where they are coming from with the rule, but its totally not fair in cases of actual tasteful artistic nude... O.o i dont really think the genitalia is going to melt your eyes/brain if you arent quite eighteen. OMGPENIS*DIE*
Its not fair that not everyone is able to see it the way you intended. Though, of course... this version is absolutely just as stunning. I hate to see you forced to edit your ideas (though it fills me with glee that you care enough about your fans to edit it so everyone has a chance to enjoy your beautiful work, either way)
<3 love both versions mah dear.... do you plan on coloring it someday? *hopes she didnt overlook you answering that in the descriptions for some reason*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lostinfog88 [2007-10-20 02:59:50 +0000 UTC]
Wonderfully imaginative. I love it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ocean-Fitheach [2007-10-20 02:52:48 +0000 UTC]
kid friendly versions always bugged me... I mean, what's wrong with the human body, anyways? And besides, what is really changed by hiding the nipples? Seriously. That Spears video where she's wearing like nothing but there are stars over her nipples... how does that change anything?
but ya... I never understood it. My parents are the good kind - the kind that answer all the questions without getting all awkward and don't care when I see a statue of a naked person no matter what my age is. So when I went to the art gallery and all the kids made a huge deal out of everything, I could never understand. Teacher once saw me admiring a statue rather than freaking out about it and asked me what I saw that the rest of them didn't - I shrugged and said it was a person, and it must have been hard to do in copper, and I didn't know why the rest of them couldn't just see it's amazingness.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sporks-machete [2007-10-20 02:33:30 +0000 UTC]
Stunning.
Your work never ceases to amaze me in its detail and quality.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KiraKiraStudio [2007-10-20 02:32:42 +0000 UTC]
I'm faving them both right now. The posture is so serene, almost relaxing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dipp [2007-10-20 02:21:17 +0000 UTC]
this is very thoughtful of you to do :]
thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>