HOME | DD
iremini — Galata
Published: 2009-03-09 18:22:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 6193; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 27
Redirect to original
Description
@Istanbul,2009Related content
Comments: 61
vay neler olmuş ya..
forumda görünce burdakine bakmamıştım, enis'in tutoriali okuyunca aklıma geldi bakmak
bence cidden şahane olmuş
çok güzel, çok orijinal olmuş
kıskananlar çatlasın..
açıklamasında circle of confusion'a link koy istersen?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
üyeliğim bitsin belki tekrar alırlar diye koyacağım zaten (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yuh bu yorumlar ne yav böyle
bu angut gavurlar gaza getirdi bi tutorial hazırlıyorum bu amelyatlı halimle
adı da "circle of confusion influence on reflection overflow" olacak
içiniz rahat olsun james clark maxwell in adıyla çıktım yola
fotoları çektim şimdi düzenleyip haftasonu yükleyecem
sonra kapağı baskıya veririz..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ya sorma gecenin bi yarısı bizi de sinir ettiler neyse ki raw dan sonra biraz ikna oldular ama biri ısrarla inanamadı...Klasik alman tepkisiydi aslında beni pek de şaşırtmadılar 
Buarada çok geçmiş olsun..Kendine dikkat et...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wow
Never seen anything like this before.
Brilliant!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
çok teşekkür ederim!Fotoğraflarını çok beğendiğim birinin beğenmesi beni çok mutlu etti
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
obvious means doubt?
you were sure about this was a manipulation.
now you changed it into doubt..
i think you are funny..
whatever. if you take a lot of picture, someday you can take creative pics like this..
good luck..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I have tried to open the raw with Photoshop and it failed.
Then I read the file's EXIF data with another program and surprise: The EXIF data says that the picture was originally taken in JPG and not in RAW/CR2. Normally it should name RAW as taken Quality/Compression mode in the EXIF data, but it does not. I hence doubt the authenticity of your picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i think your program or your mind has a problem..
we always take photos in raw.
just open it in canon dpp(digital photo professional)
i think you are pushing it hard..
it's time to apologize
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You suggest that I am mental and I should apologize? You're funny.
If I doubt a picture I feel free to tell my opinion.
Anyway, why should I care in the first place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
are you sure its not a manipulation? I see some of the skylines structure in the taxi. Kinda looks like you forgot to erase there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Come to Istanbul sometime, you will see how I take it...
maybe because of f1.8...i think you should try f1.8 apertured photos and see the blurrines of it.
also see: "reflections in photograpy"
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
haha... sorry about that flame war right here. Im just telling you that its impossible to take that picture... Then theres that (not very realistic) bokeh which goes into the taxi but nowhere else outside the "mirror"?
Then theres that reflection which is impossible to have with a simple uv filter. It just doesnt look right.
See what I mean?
Even if I went to istanbul for a tutorial, I guess there will be nothing but 'shopping lessons.
I take most of my shots with a 50/1.8 too... i dont know what kind of magical lens you have, but mine cant do that
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
It's not about your lens, its about your mind...
See what I mean?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, if its about my mind, how could i see?
You raw does look like it should to me, but i agree with mundm there. it does not look right, and i still doubt it, the critical points i noted above wont change. It still looks like an unproper collage.
Speaking for me, I didnt mean to insult you.
I guess, I owe you an excuse, since you uploaded the raw as an evidence
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
if you beleive it, it's impossible i just pity you.
i can take tons of picture like this.
if you want we can upload the raw of this picture..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"because of f1.8"?
How did you get the background as sharp as the reflection and why isn't the front of the lens sharp as well? How comes that the reflection is at the taxi too?
I would like to read a tutorial how to make it. Any link for me?
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
by the way, i'm the reflector on this photo.
i have a 24-70 f2.8 on my 40d
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
because both of the visions are at the infinity.
i didn't get why you people just so suprised about this photo.
if you hae a 50mm f1.8 lens just try it. but take the reflector lens big and an uv filter on it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And that's exactly the point, why the reflection is all over the cab but not on the bus. That reflection has a mind of it's own when it comes to where it would like to be.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that's because of 1.8..
you can see an example here;
[link]
in this photo aperture is 4.5 but this reflection is overfloved a little at the right side.
you should try it. when you see a result like this; you will be very sorry.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
As I said a very selective reflection, because it should overflow on the bus too. I'll try this with my 55/1.2.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
just look the raw then you'll believe.
it's just canon 50mm f1.8, priced 115$..
and you all insulted us..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ok, I'm sorry... it just didn't fit somehow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I hope that you are sorry about callin' me "Liar"
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I already said I'm sorry. Didn't I?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh, your little girlfriend was caught and now you're angry... how cute.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hoer einfach mal auf die Leute zu verarschenn und erklaer mal wie die Reflexion aufs Taxi kommt. Hat die abgestrahlt oder was? Leute gibts, die sind sogar zum Bescheissen zu daemlich.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>