Comments: 217
Sama-Llama [2013-03-27 00:27:33 +0000 UTC]
I'm incredibly late to the party, but whoever says there's no point is nuts! It takes an amazing amount of skill to do the kind of art you do- and there's a beauty to it being art rather than just a photograph. I hope you don't get that as much anymore (since there'll always be at least that one snob, unfortunately) because my goodness, your work is breathtaking!
Why can't everyone just appreciate all the different forms of art and be supportive? v.v
π: 0 β©: 0
petaltailify97 [2013-03-27 00:14:07 +0000 UTC]
LOL! That just made my day. XD BEST, COMEBACK, EVER!
π: 0 β©: 0
Cabres [2013-03-13 15:17:03 +0000 UTC]
Per your reply comment, I must agree. With the creation of actual art, you are not only showing your vast analytical view for the details that are before you, but making it something that absolutely can withstand far longer than the actual object. Granted, a photo does the same, but doesn't create it with the same passion for the actual creation over the boggling issue of time. It fully shows the love for what is there, rather than the quick, "let me remember this moment" situation that photography would give to something deemed small though could hold a tremendous level of importance further along in life. Like how masturbation gives you the quick release, but it doesn't give the grand experience and joy that actual sex offers. But, not knocking photography in general. Just knocking the "quick pic" over the true intimacy of/with/for the object and/or moment.
π: 0 β©: 0
Tarallo12 [2013-03-03 22:05:31 +0000 UTC]
ignore the haters lol... they are just jealous. ps. your work is jaw dropping, very talented
π: 0 β©: 0
M406 [2013-02-18 18:04:04 +0000 UTC]
Haha, now if only I had the nerve to use your comeback when people say that to me!
π: 0 β©: 0
digitalcc [2013-02-14 00:35:03 +0000 UTC]
one who creates an illusion of realism has a open mind of perspective . Only narrow minded people suggest taking a photograph.
π: 0 β©: 0
PangieArt [2013-02-13 20:59:06 +0000 UTC]
Ha! *high fives*
π: 0 β©: 1
JW-Jeong In reply to PangieArt [2013-02-15 16:47:01 +0000 UTC]
*high faves back*
π: 0 β©: 0
JW-Jeong In reply to redcyanide [2013-02-15 16:53:48 +0000 UTC]
haha, a fine logic! Not only the mean to explore yourself, but like art, also the way to express something!
π: 0 β©: 0
JW-Jeong In reply to AaronQuinn [2013-02-15 16:55:43 +0000 UTC]
there always is a next time!
π: 0 β©: 0
Lazy--kurt [2013-02-01 19:07:44 +0000 UTC]
<3
π: 0 β©: 0
ErnestoVladimir [2013-01-31 03:49:59 +0000 UTC]
Hey, you gotta know how to appreciate the best of both worlds : D
π: 0 β©: 1
richessmile [2013-01-31 03:20:52 +0000 UTC]
Nice one!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Mirai-Xenia [2013-01-30 07:34:51 +0000 UTC]
This is the reason that I found my experience at a Fina Arts College to be somewhat depressing. I even had professors say that there was no point to my work because it relied too much on imagery and not enough on concept. If it weren't for one illustration, and another perspective professor I had, it would have taken much longer to stop doubting my abilities as an artist. In the end you just have to shut out the naysayers and only listen to those who actually care enough to give constructive criticism.
Love the parallel you bought up. I'll have to remember it for whenever I run into my past classmates and professors.
π: 0 β©: 1
LauraQuiles [2013-01-30 01:24:18 +0000 UTC]
Ha! You're awesome!
π: 0 β©: 1
Elsola [2013-01-28 03:33:14 +0000 UTC]
LOL. I f***ing love you for saying this!
π: 0 β©: 1
JW-Jeong In reply to Elsola [2013-02-15 17:01:10 +0000 UTC]
haha, thanks!
π: 0 β©: 0
agnes90 [2013-01-27 18:13:33 +0000 UTC]
good one! ;D
'hi five' for that
π: 0 β©: 1
JW-Jeong In reply to agnes90 [2013-02-15 17:01:22 +0000 UTC]
'hi five'!
π: 0 β©: 0
carol-colors [2013-01-27 07:03:55 +0000 UTC]
I'm a fan ... and I like um "photography" AND "paintings"
π: 0 β©: 1
Rseifert [2013-01-27 02:17:07 +0000 UTC]
I love that reply. I also agree with most of the intellect in the post. Wether or not you can paint, draw or spit a magnificent piece of art and have it clearly represent what you want it to is task in itself. The fact that someone like you can make it as clear and precise as a photograph is a miracle. It would take someone lime me a lifetime to achieve something so clear. Awesome!
π: 0 β©: 1
Rseifert In reply to JW-Jeong [2013-01-27 16:45:09 +0000 UTC]
From you, that's a great compliment! The skull was my second painting. I only just used to sketch thing and thought that I should try painting.. Thank you so much and best wishes to you.
π: 0 β©: 0
aegir2501 [2013-01-27 01:28:17 +0000 UTC]
good one
+1
π: 0 β©: 1
consilient [2013-01-26 18:17:10 +0000 UTC]
Sex = The real thing
Masturbation = A photograph of the real thing
???? = Painting realistically
Some people think Picasso couldn't paint realistically. But his early art was extremely realistic.
He once said "Why should an artist persist in treating subjects that can be established so clearly with the lens of a camera?"
The rest is history.
Don't take me wrong. I LOVE your art.
I just think that an artist becomes a great artist when they're able to see beyond the realism and starts to create something new from it.
π: 0 β©: 2
| Next =>