Comments: 71
ken1171 In reply to ??? [2014-08-14 15:07:06 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I should try this again at some point. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Arokhrynn [2014-03-04 21:57:57 +0000 UTC]
beautiful,lovely,amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to Arokhrynn [2014-03-04 23:59:05 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I should try more of these. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
roylapost [2010-02-17 19:47:39 +0000 UTC]
Nice work, but I can't seem to focus on her lips long enough to tell if the sync-ing is any good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lightangelhimika [2009-05-26 06:46:57 +0000 UTC]
When she said : "Will work with Poser Pro..." it seemed like she was stuttering.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to lightangelhimika [2009-05-26 19:57:49 +0000 UTC]
This animation is GPU accelerated. If your video card doesn't support that, chances are there might be stuttering during playback. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Poserhobbit [2009-04-26 04:10:09 +0000 UTC]
Awesome work!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to Mallet [2009-04-18 17:25:23 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! This is a computer voice from Acapela. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mallet In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-18 19:03:52 +0000 UTC]
Wow, it fitted perfectly!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to Mallet [2009-04-18 20:16:49 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I think it's a pretty good voice, but I would prefer a real female voice. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
StudioFuijinzz [2009-04-18 10:06:56 +0000 UTC]
That's quite amazing stuff! Kinda makes me wish I knew more about creating stuff in 3D!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to StudioFuijinzz [2009-04-18 17:23:28 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! It makes me wish I had a faster computer. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RedWingsDragon [2009-04-18 05:27:50 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm yes. sexy work here
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LoneStranger [2009-04-18 04:48:02 +0000 UTC]
Good start, I think the audio skipped once or twice for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to LoneStranger [2009-04-18 05:43:27 +0000 UTC]
This animation was meant to be played with the help of GPU acceleration, and from my little survey I estimate about 50% of the people have it. For everybody else things may lag. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LoneStranger In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-18 22:48:06 +0000 UTC]
Eh fair enough.
I gotta get the money together for a better computer, a Reactor mebbe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to LoneStranger [2009-04-19 02:45:28 +0000 UTC]
You could be surprised how much improvement you could get from your old computer by just adding a faster video card. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LoneStranger In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-19 06:22:18 +0000 UTC]
Yeah but then I'd find the next thing to upgrade and the next thing to upgrade and eventually it'd just a situation of saying "screw it, new system".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to LoneStranger [2009-04-19 07:56:06 +0000 UTC]
Not necessarily. You can greatly improve your system by getting a new video card. Even 3D games need more GPU than CPU nowadays. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LoneStranger In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-19 18:45:38 +0000 UTC]
I know, but there's almost always a faster processor, more memory, etc out there so a wholesale upgrade would work out well.
Besides if you look up the Reactor computer you'll see what I'd love to upgrade too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to LoneStranger [2009-04-19 20:29:34 +0000 UTC]
Right now I have a pretty good processor and mobo, but I need more RAM and the mobo only takes up to 4Gb. -_-
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to LoneStranger [2009-04-20 06:03:52 +0000 UTC]
If you ever upgrade to 64-bits like I recently did, you will notice Windows 7 uses way more memory because it separates every process on their own memory space, which makes the OS more stable at the expense of loads of additional memory usage. I would love to have 8Gb RAM right now...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LoneStranger In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-21 03:18:40 +0000 UTC]
You mean Vista or the one they're dumping that one for?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LoneStranger In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-21 04:43:13 +0000 UTC]
Not using XP in favor of the post Vista system is not a bad thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LoneStranger In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-21 05:26:18 +0000 UTC]
You think Microsoft would've recognized that as a problem early on in Vista.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ShuyinK [2009-04-17 17:40:09 +0000 UTC]
really good job ken
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to ShuyinK [2009-04-17 19:04:19 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. ^____^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zapinc [2009-04-17 17:20:55 +0000 UTC]
The teeth dont appear to seperate
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to Zapinc [2009-04-17 19:03:26 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, it may look like that because the animation is rather small and the teeth show only as a few pixels wide. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zapinc In reply to ken1171 [2009-04-20 13:59:27 +0000 UTC]
Good luck next time!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bear48 [2009-04-17 15:21:22 +0000 UTC]
seems to work
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to bear48 [2009-04-17 19:01:33 +0000 UTC]
^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ben187 [2009-04-17 14:29:22 +0000 UTC]
haha nice, but as the lady said above you should try to emphasive her lip movement more to complement the words more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to ben187 [2009-04-17 19:01:27 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I used like 40% phonem scale, and I thought that more than that makes her look funny instead of talking. Perhaps it may look she is not emphasizing the words because the animation is rather small and it is difficult to see. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ArtWithoutPrediction [2009-04-17 14:04:41 +0000 UTC]
Are you using Mimic?
Also, I can give you a female voice, if you need one for this dialogue.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ken1171 In reply to ArtWithoutPrediction [2009-04-17 18:59:35 +0000 UTC]
I used the default built-in Poser 7 lip sync (called Talk Designer).
I would *love* to have a real voice instead synthetic one. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArtWithoutPrediction In reply to ken1171 [2011-05-22 15:55:38 +0000 UTC]
This has been absurdly old but I JUST bought a new mic for 36 and it's a headset.
Still need that voice?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>