Comments: 10
Strykeforce2005 [2016-04-15 11:50:14 +0000 UTC]
I believe this is the one from The Lost World: Jurassic Park.
π: 0 β©: 2
pyrorptrs In reply to Strykeforce2005 [2016-04-15 14:50:00 +0000 UTC]
In the film it was Mamenchisaurus, in the novel it was Apatasaurus. Don't know why they changed it though; especially considering that Apatasaurus was a much more recognizable dinosaur, ESPECIALLY in the 90's when people still believed the mislabeling of it as a Brontosaurus (recently a new genus of dinosaur was discovered which was named Brontosaurus). Seems weird to me especially considering how utterly insane marketing was at that time.
π: 0 β©: 1
Strykeforce2005 In reply to pyrorptrs [2016-04-15 16:08:08 +0000 UTC]
Didn't know that. Interesting. I still find it strange Apatosaurus didn't make a JP movie until World.
π: 0 β©: 1
pyrorptrs In reply to Strykeforce2005 [2016-04-15 17:07:47 +0000 UTC]
It is weird they would go for the more obscure Sauropod in the Lost World; but if I had to guess it would be because aside from Brachiosaurus, most people would prefer seeing dinosaurs other than a generic Sauropod
π: 0 β©: 0
lizardman22 In reply to Strykeforce2005 [2016-04-15 12:17:02 +0000 UTC]
i think you're right, the sauropod in lost world was mamenchisaurus
π: 0 β©: 1
Strykeforce2005 In reply to lizardman22 [2016-04-15 12:20:38 +0000 UTC]
A lot of people probably wouldn't catch it. At first I assumed it was brachiosaurus but this dinosaur's neck doesn't stay vertical and missing the nasal features.
π: 0 β©: 1
lizardman22 In reply to Strykeforce2005 [2016-04-17 03:16:31 +0000 UTC]
very true, yeah
plus the neck was too long and thin to be brachiosaur
π: 0 β©: 0