Comments: 17
54godamora [2020-07-25 02:11:21 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GlendonMellow [2008-08-14 16:16:38 +0000 UTC]
It has a lot of personality in the face. I like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Steveoc86 [2008-08-13 14:52:45 +0000 UTC]
I'm really likeing your recent underwater pictures. The backgrounds add a lot to the images, they look great!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna [2008-08-13 12:13:15 +0000 UTC]
Also, have you thought of drawing a crowd of them to represent one of the death-assemblages?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to avancna [2008-08-13 13:34:09 +0000 UTC]
Nope!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2008-08-13 19:06:32 +0000 UTC]
It would be awesome if you did.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2008-08-14 15:05:06 +0000 UTC]
Sooooo...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2008-08-14 15:33:27 +0000 UTC]
That would work, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
avancna [2008-08-13 12:12:30 +0000 UTC]
Buettneria is occupied?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to avancna [2008-08-13 13:33:50 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, by a bush-cricket from the Republic of Congo known as Buettneria maculiceps Karsh, 1889. The info about the name change has been published in Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology (Mueller B.D., J. of Vert. Paleont.,27(1) (2007) 225.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2008-08-13 19:06:22 +0000 UTC]
It's Brontosaurus versus Apatosaurus all over again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NTamura In reply to avancna [2008-08-14 06:00:45 +0000 UTC]
Wasn't it a story about Tyrannosaurus rex's name having some nomenclenturan problem?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
avancna In reply to NTamura [2008-08-14 15:03:38 +0000 UTC]
Yes, but, in Trex's case, everyone kept their big mouths shut because everyone realized that "Dynamosaurus" was just too silly a name.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0