Comments: 39
blood-of-mars [2008-02-16 21:36:11 +0000 UTC]
wow!!
i love it!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sashona [2008-02-03 21:06:23 +0000 UTC]
Wow! Amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sgtgrandpa [2006-03-01 02:48:53 +0000 UTC]
My total fav. Currently used as my wallpapaer. I am trying to make something like this as an exercise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Parad1gm In reply to Jakali [2006-03-03 03:12:48 +0000 UTC]
Thank you bunches jakali!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Parad1gm In reply to Gulloh [2006-02-21 17:49:24 +0000 UTC]
Thanks so much gulloh!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gulloh In reply to Parad1gm [2006-02-22 12:40:51 +0000 UTC]
Your welcome^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mistshadow2k4 [2006-02-14 14:32:10 +0000 UTC]
Wait a minute.... giving the picture a good look, I see that the shadow at the bottom right is just about where the planet's shadow would be. So that part is right. Hmmm.... I guess it would probably look right if the shadow was a little darker, but I'm not certain if that would be correct.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mistshadow2k4 [2006-02-14 14:28:24 +0000 UTC]
I agree that the planet needs a shadow, but most of the shadow would be off-camera due to the angle. "Too solid and intimidating"? It's common to make planets in the look transparent, and while that's very pretty, it's also wrong. Go outside and look at a full moon sometime - how transparent does it look? Not all of course, it's a solid object. Now imagine if were much, much bigger. It also would look frighteningly close as this planet does.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Parad1gm In reply to moonfullofstars [2006-02-14 16:13:17 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, i smoothed it a bit because there were a LOT of artifacts and noise in the nebulas that I had a hard time removing. I could sharpen them back up, but it may bring back some of the artifacts...I dunno, what do you think? The dreamy effect is something I was kind of going for as well though...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Parad1gm In reply to smazat-do-kose [2006-02-14 16:14:05 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, i understand what you mean. A few people have commented on this also, so I'm going to take a look at the piece and maybe submit a version 2 of it. We'll see...thanks for the constructive criticism!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Scyrens [2006-02-14 00:23:31 +0000 UTC]
wow, thats really cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Parad1gm In reply to Scyrens [2006-02-14 16:14:25 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a bunch!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Scyrens In reply to Parad1gm [2006-02-14 23:16:46 +0000 UTC]
no prob.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RayFalling In reply to Parad1gm [2006-02-14 16:18:47 +0000 UTC]
Ah I see. Keep trying then! n_n
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RayFalling In reply to Parad1gm [2006-02-14 16:35:58 +0000 UTC]
I hear ya! I been saying the same thing to myself!
When comparing non-tablet work with tablet work 0_0 you can seriously see the difference. And the beauty of it is, you dont even need that much talent. 0_0 I was close to reaching simillar effects use a mouse 0_0 n_n;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Parad1gm In reply to zebravissimo [2006-02-14 16:28:54 +0000 UTC]
Thanks again zebravissimo...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0