Comments: 18
Paleop [2017-04-06 15:30:47 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful skull, awesome work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ceratopsia [2016-05-07 14:11:55 +0000 UTC]
Would it be ok for me to use this skeletal in a clay model I'm making (I will fully credit you)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Terizinosaurus [2015-05-20 07:38:39 +0000 UTC]
MY FAVOURITE !!!
IT IS VERY FANTASTIC!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EmperorDinobot [2011-08-21 11:43:52 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, when I looked at this I thought 'O SAURORNITHOIDES'.
What happened to Saurornithoides as a genus? I don't keep track of mainraptorans anymore. I fanaticize over sauropods, ankylosaurs and genasauria.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Qilong In reply to EmperorDinobot [2011-08-21 20:11:10 +0000 UTC]
Saurornithoides still exists. It only contains the type species, Saurornithoides mongoliensis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorDinobot In reply to Qilong [2011-09-07 10:57:40 +0000 UTC]
Which is comprised of: ???
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qilong In reply to EmperorDinobot [2011-09-08 07:38:56 +0000 UTC]
The holotype. Maybe some other specimens. Mickey Mortimer ([link] ) proposes other published specimens likely belong, but there's doubt. The holotype is a skull, vertebrae and a set of hips, and a foot. Not much else.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pilsator In reply to EmperorDinobot [2011-08-21 18:28:58 +0000 UTC]
Well, junior might not be closest to S. mongoliensis, so the authors went the safe way and erected a new genus for junior.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorDinobot In reply to pilsator [2011-09-07 10:58:06 +0000 UTC]
So then junior is Saurornitholestes or...something new?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pilsator In reply to EmperorDinobot [2011-09-07 23:56:54 +0000 UTC]
If it's something new, this something new is called Zanabazar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorDinobot In reply to EmperorDinobot [2011-08-21 11:44:50 +0000 UTC]
Yes. I meant to say fanaticize. Turned fanatic into a verb.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DrScottHartman [2011-08-19 03:44:07 +0000 UTC]
Excellent work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qilong In reply to DrScottHartman [2011-08-21 09:08:52 +0000 UTC]
Coming from you, Scott, that is a compliment!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pilsator [2011-08-18 22:00:08 +0000 UTC]
Awesome reconstruction, Jaime! A great animal with a skull that must have been beautiful when covered in flesh, skin and feathers. The mandible's interesting, didn't notice before how short the dentary is (especially in comparison to that long surangular).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qilong In reply to pilsator [2011-08-21 09:09:22 +0000 UTC]
Yes, very short, although there was a dinosaur with a shorter one, relatively. I'll eventually post it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1