Comments: 28
Cree-cree [2012-10-03 17:14:39 +0000 UTC]
how do u play this really really cool game that i agree is much much more superior then spore....X3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Prof-Stein [2011-08-06 04:00:43 +0000 UTC]
The creature is one of many I have for a video game idea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Prof-Stein [2011-08-06 03:55:22 +0000 UTC]
The angle at which you drew #24 gave me the answer to how I should draw my own creature. Thank you. :3
Btw, your artwork is amazing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
godofimagination [2010-07-21 03:08:01 +0000 UTC]
plasmogenic capabilities? plasma sacs? What are those?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Excalibur-T005 [2010-03-09 00:10:59 +0000 UTC]
Wait, let me make sure I've got the idea of your pen-and-paper game right - you start off with one rather simple idea, and then build off of it in a biologically realistic way until you've filled up the paper with that creature's descendents?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Marcusstratus [2009-10-10 04:39:18 +0000 UTC]
you know, it'd be really cool to see your idea of what spore could be... as in sketch a couple different organisms that start out as cells and then various stages of their evolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bahmo [2009-05-07 19:01:08 +0000 UTC]
You may not be aware of this, but Spore wasn't always the candy-coated monstrosity that it is today. When it was first unveiled, it literally looked like a reenactment of something gritty that you'd see on the discovery channel. Not entirely scientific, as creatures were still designed in the game, rather than evolving via mutation, but the gameplay itself was still hardcore Darwinism, with a lot of fighting and hunting (with gore!), segments where you had to protect your eggs from predators until they were ready to hatch, and more realistic calculations designed to make creatures actually function according to their body type.
The game we have today is a shitty mockery that exists because the original would allegedly be too complicated and gory for the nonscientific players, so I think they scrapped the whole project and rebuilt it from the ground up in a hurry. What really sucks, though, is that the pro-science, hardcore fanbase is precisely to whom the game was marketed, even to the very end. Bad games are one thing, but false advertising is even worse.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
axem-ranger-black [2009-03-13 16:12:59 +0000 UTC]
heh i had the spor idea LONG b4 spore also ... but i love spore lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zypherax [2009-01-18 05:37:02 +0000 UTC]
eh, I agree with you that allot of stuf on spore is cartoony, but I hardly play the game... I just create plausable looking aliens that I sometimes skecth out on paper first... I use the game as something to explore new limb configurations and body shapes ect. for some of my drawings... once I learned how to use the creator, none of my creations continued to look cartoonish. if you go to the sporepedia and search 'Ioanak' (that's the name that'll bring up a bunch of my good creatures), you'll see what I mean.
nice work on the fish thing here by the way!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
toadking07 [2009-01-12 17:14:25 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, not going to lie, had the same feeling about spore. Just too, cheesy! Really should have been more about making sure your species survived to the next generation. Instead of just, fight other species, lay egg, redesign species, repeat. Could have made it more complex, darker, lessly saturday morning cartoonish.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tomozaurus [2008-10-28 23:46:07 +0000 UTC]
"If you have a video game to design just give me a call and i'll be glad to design stuff for it"
Is that serious?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rodrigo-Vega In reply to Tomozaurus [2008-10-29 15:30:46 +0000 UTC]
Well ... yes, sure, I mean, I can't progam it, or nothing like that. But if you if you have an idea and you are in fact thinking about seriously make a game, and you have programmers 'n stuff, I'll be glad to design characters, places, devices, story, whatever.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tomozaurus In reply to Rodrigo-Vega [2008-10-30 01:49:10 +0000 UTC]
Thats really cool. Too bad I didn't know this back when I was involved the creation of a video game.
You wouldn't be kind enough to design stuff for my novel would ya?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Rodrigo-Vega In reply to Tomozaurus [2008-10-30 17:22:48 +0000 UTC]
...As long as there are dinosaurs or monsters or monster-dinosaurs. Well I'd have to read it and then make myself some time or something. It is already written?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tomozaurus In reply to Rodrigo-Vega [2008-10-31 02:07:11 +0000 UTC]
There are many dinosaurs in it. And its not written yet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Skull-Island-Master [2008-10-21 14:56:02 +0000 UTC]
Spore is abd because even realistic creatures looks childish, but it is the only game where you can make your own animals.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Masonatronic In reply to Skull-Island-Master [2009-09-09 19:23:39 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, i wish a bigger company came along, and made it so much more realistic.
It should have a more alien, out-of-this-world feel, not crummy cartoons. It should be difficult, where extinction is possible and strategy is a must.
I hope this happens soon, but i'm living with spore...for now!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zetsubou-Ninja [2008-09-14 20:18:14 +0000 UTC]
Okami stole my wolf idea two years before the game was ever anounced. i'm in the same boat friend T_T.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
whalewithlegs [2008-09-13 20:38:05 +0000 UTC]
Ooh, how did I miss this one?
I'm really disappointed with Spore's overall look. You have to work SO HARD to make things look great, especially after seeing how awesome the beta versions were!
It is nice to know, however, that there is still ground left to be covered & that we can still make more awesome animals ourselves!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Deliquescere [2008-08-24 19:08:19 +0000 UTC]
I agree, Spore is too whimsical.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
metallic-orb [2008-08-24 15:58:37 +0000 UTC]
whoa. awesome and well thought out. each one is... great.
and yeah, spore sucks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0