HOME | DD

Sanity-X โ€” KP- Hunt for the Kim Possible

Published: 2008-11-27 20:28:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 4701; Favourites: 30; Downloads: 172
Redirect to original
Description The Soviets didn't quite take it so well when Kimmie took out one of their 'State-of-the-Art' T-80 tanks. [link]

So they went all out and sent a whole battalion to find her!

-----------------

Heheh, this was mostly just an excuse for me to churn out a huge armoured column. Please take note that the car to the right serves no practical purpose atm, I just wanted to draw a car. In a ditch. For no particular reason. Whatsoever.

Still a work in progress. I'll finish it up when I'm not so busy with stuff. ^_^
Related content
Comments: 48

Jared1994 [2015-03-27 19:42:39 +0000 UTC]

You made good sketches!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

LukeDanger [2010-12-02 00:18:15 +0000 UTC]

ROFLMAO
Effin' hilarious!
I think Colonel Sawyer needs to send Bannon in now... and Parker. and Webb. And Mike/Anton. And the lovely paradrops he likes to send.

Hrrrm... give her the Centurion project and she could probably take them on.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to LukeDanger [2011-02-28 08:44:04 +0000 UTC]

Hahah, I think Kimmie is really waiting on that backup~

The Centurion Project, mmm... That'd be overkill~ The soviets will surrender within the week if Kimmie got her hands on that... XD

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

kar98k [2010-09-09 09:05:39 +0000 UTC]

Rise of nations pride

Russians on a route to ruin
Kreml is more then certain to win
Sent away an army to the west

Blizzard reigned the ground were chosen
Snow was deep and hell were frozen
Stalin were too eager to invade

He thought of the might he possessed
And not of his foe
Rage of winter

Rise, nations pride
Hold whats yours
Strike'em were it hurts

Fight, hold your ground
Winter war
Reinforce the line

Split them into small divisions
Rip 'em of the conquest visions
Motti tactics used with great result

Snipers move unseen in snowfall
Force them to retreat and recall
Fight the Russian rule and their demand

With Molotov cocktail in hand
No fear of their tanks
Death or glory

A slice of a knife to a throat
And their blood turns to ice
TALVISOTA!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

JDodwar45 [2010-08-17 03:15:16 +0000 UTC]

putins somewhere in between those tanks.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to JDodwar45 [2011-02-28 08:44:16 +0000 UTC]

O Rly?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

strange-familiar [2009-04-30 01:34:31 +0000 UTC]

moar liek a regiment amiriet?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

DilaZirK [2008-12-10 04:35:44 +0000 UTC]

DAAHAHAHAH! XD

I really don't know why, but I just had to LOL at the sight of the rather out-of-place wrecked car.

It's as if amidst the battalion, a speeding car came out of nowhere and drove write into the ditch all the while screaming "KAMIKAZE WATERMELON!!".

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

mildirk [2008-12-08 02:13:02 +0000 UTC]

You're gonna color this right?

Kim reminds me of Tanya Adams from Red Alert 1 lol. Shake it baby!

Lip gloss... hmmm. Must spinach to her. She might really break those tanks. The Russians could've just saved all the trouble and just nuke her.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Shego-Rocks [2008-12-06 15:14:12 +0000 UTC]

haha....
A question: The two Tanks on left, what Tanks are these? (I don't know these two)

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to Shego-Rocks [2008-12-06 19:20:19 +0000 UTC]

That would be the PT-76 amphibious tank on the foreground, and the T-62 behind it. ^_^

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Klocx [2008-12-03 00:12:26 +0000 UTC]

Well, even if an armored column isn't by definition the best for search and destroy on personnel, it is always much fun to have and to deploy. Oh, and that car is for rolling over when crossing a ditch or fascine. Or for kicks. Probably the latter.

That aside,

ะ—ะ ะกะžะฎะ—ะ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111!!!!1!!!!111!!!!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to Klocx [2008-12-06 05:03:43 +0000 UTC]

Heheh, indeed. I mean, why sent a hunting party to retrieve when you can send the heaviest tanks of the great Soviet Union after a pesky teen hero? Especially one as capable as Kim? ^_^

For the Union indeed! XD

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Klocx In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-09 23:53:00 +0000 UTC]

By the way, in what year is this? The presence of a T-80 makes it 1985 at its earliest, but it could still be a little further ahead. Any knowing?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to Klocx [2008-12-12 07:55:40 +0000 UTC]

Since this is technically still based on World in Conflict, it'd be 1989.

Note the vintage vehicles still in service, like the PT-76 and T-62 (which I thought the T-72 might've been more appropriate in the game, but meh~) ^_^

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Skoshi8 [2008-11-29 03:03:26 +0000 UTC]

I think that her laser lipstick would work better than lip gloss (essence of sweatsock) on armor. Can't wait to see the finished version.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to Skoshi8 [2008-12-01 19:57:33 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, perhaps.

But with a portion of russian armour covered with hundreds of ERA blocks (Explosive Reactive Armour), mayhaps one should be cautious about where they point that laser, eh? ^_^

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Skoshi8 In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-04 01:26:12 +0000 UTC]

Yes, as dangerous to the attacker as to the one being attacked

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to Skoshi8 [2008-12-06 04:55:41 +0000 UTC]

Indeed~ ^_^

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Battlefield-Blog [2008-11-28 22:46:17 +0000 UTC]

Run Kimmi Run! XD

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

blyanydovai [2008-11-28 06:35:03 +0000 UTC]

Lip gloss? Ha! Not each anti tank device may beat T-80. And ofcourse lip gloss will not help her. Even if it is by Wade Load...

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to blyanydovai [2008-11-28 17:45:17 +0000 UTC]

Well, erm... She can do anything! XDXD

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

blyanydovai In reply to Sanity-X [2008-11-28 18:07:55 +0000 UTC]

Good point.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

PhysicRodrigo [2008-11-28 00:15:03 +0000 UTC]

It looks like I'm not the only one with the idea of a Kim Possible / World In Conflict crossover. hehehe

I gave KP a submarine mode for the occasion:

[link]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to PhysicRodrigo [2008-11-28 18:02:23 +0000 UTC]

Heheh, I was wondering if there were others as crazy as I am to propose such an idea. Apparently there are, and you're one of them! XD

Heya, partner of canon-defying crime~ ^_^

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

PhysicRodrigo In reply to Sanity-X [2008-11-29 01:34:04 +0000 UTC]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

KodyYoung [2008-11-27 21:08:45 +0000 UTC]

she'll be very busy if she wants to get rid of EVERY Russian Federation tank.
Guinness Book of World Records for 2009
Country with the most tanks in service (operation):
1. Russia - over 22,000
2. U.S. - around 7,100
3. China - around 7,000

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to KodyYoung [2008-11-28 18:22:23 +0000 UTC]

What, really? Does the Russian Federation really have 3 times more tanks than U.S. or China? That's just nuts, dude! XD

Any idea if that statistic is all the tanks in active duty or does it include those in reserve and storage too? (like the T-55s and T-64s. I'm pretty sure there's still a ton of those in storage ATM.)

But on the subject though, this crossover happens while the *United States of Soviet Russia still existed. Even then, she has her work cut out for her, doesn't she?

* Buahhahahaha! I can still remember a time when I really believed that was what USSR abbreviates! XD

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

KodyYoung In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-01 12:27:22 +0000 UTC]

If they included those in storage and reserve, the American would throw in their Shermans while Russia would throw in their whole T family
Think about it, it probably from all the T-80s and T-90s in operation, and the fact, Russia can have 3 T tanks for every 1 U.S. Abram. China is off in their own little world, giving some of their tanks to their police force o_O

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 2

Sanity-X In reply to KodyYoung [2008-12-01 20:24:17 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... You have a point there~

Just a note, Russia is still running T-72s alongside their T-80s and their less numerous T-90 brothers. Unless you regard the new modernised T-72BM as just basically T-90s, then you'd be right and I'd be a stickler for details~ ^_^

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

KodyYoung In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-02 02:43:54 +0000 UTC]

I thought the T-72s would be not highly used anymore, except in the Middle East, where they're used a lot.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to KodyYoung [2008-12-02 19:03:13 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, I think the Georgian Conflict kinda proves otherwise though. There were basically nothing but T-72s rolling across Georgia, used heavily by both sides.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

KodyYoung In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-02 20:27:36 +0000 UTC]

Maybe Russia was trying to get rid of them
Now that's a fair fight, same technology level, only problem is, its the same technology

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to KodyYoung [2008-12-06 04:39:09 +0000 UTC]

True that. It's down to crew training and tactical prowess to see who wins the day.

Although... Russias numerical superiority probably tipped the fight to their favour.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

KodyYoung In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-06 06:43:27 +0000 UTC]

"Although... Russias numerical superiority probably tipped the fight to their favour." REALLY?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to KodyYoung [2008-12-09 07:19:27 +0000 UTC]

Ya Rly! XD

Hehe, talk about stating the obvious eh?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Sanity-X In reply to KodyYoung [2008-12-01 20:00:56 +0000 UTC]

You have a point there~

I'd imagined with the economic crisis Russia endured during the 90s and the loss of so many of their satellite states might've put a dent in Russias ability to maintain such an enormous motorpool, but apparently I was wrong in this regard.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 2

KodyYoung In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-02 02:44:53 +0000 UTC]

Who knows, it might have gone down then back up in early 2000s

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to KodyYoung [2008-12-02 19:08:13 +0000 UTC]

Probably, since Russias economy did improve substantially after the collapse of the Union back in '89.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Sanity-X In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-01 20:25:06 +0000 UTC]

Oh what the hell...

Sorry for the double post, my net is acting up...

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

SillySoviet [2008-11-27 21:04:30 +0000 UTC]

Really nice style, you could probably be a Kim Possible animator or some other Disney project.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to SillySoviet [2008-11-28 18:28:07 +0000 UTC]

Awww, thanks mate~ ^_^

Some fine day, you just might see my name in some Disney animation credits or sumfing. Oh what a dream that'd be! XD

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

SillySoviet In reply to Sanity-X [2008-11-29 03:43:21 +0000 UTC]

Now that would be awesome.
Lookin forward too it, despite the fact I have never been able to sit through an episode of kim possible, the style is pretty cool.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

PatchKatz [2008-11-27 20:58:53 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm... maybe one of those "colaborator's" car in which she tried to escape from the russkiy... ya know, the classic "it's the least I could do to thank you for stopping the nuclear armaggedon"

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to PatchKatz [2008-12-01 04:58:27 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, that sounds like a plausible scenario.

I'm personally still trying to figure out a way how she could actually achieve such a feat. Sabotage short-range SS-1e Scud-D launchers? Sink an Akula class Ballistic Missile Submarine? I guess she can do anything, eh? ^_^

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

PatchKatz In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-01 20:43:32 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm... or maybe the more heroic "rescue the georgian officers from the camps of Siberia" XD

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Sanity-X In reply to PatchKatz [2008-12-06 04:56:56 +0000 UTC]

Georgian officers? Siberia? I'm confused... Does this have anything to do with current world events?

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

PatchKatz In reply to Sanity-X [2008-12-06 18:17:59 +0000 UTC]

Hmm... I guess so...

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0