Comments: 95
DerRiedl [2007-12-26 11:14:40 +0000 UTC]
i like how you look first on the hammer.... and then you see the broken mirror, that's just great!
π: 0 β©: 1
reinfected [2007-12-03 21:46:10 +0000 UTC]
This is a really nice shot. Was the hammer put in there digitally? It doesn't seem to fit for some reason. I dunno.
I love the shot though!
π: 0 β©: 1
mykalromero [2007-08-22 07:52:33 +0000 UTC]
GREAT concept!
π: 0 β©: 0
gorexbaby [2007-07-23 15:14:31 +0000 UTC]
the b&w makes the emotion in the picture really stand out.
π: 0 β©: 0
linecut [2007-02-26 18:26:09 +0000 UTC]
The model's pose is great but the photo is way overexposured. The man is blending in with his own shadow which looks really strange and the lack of tones in the white background makes the whole composition look a little empty.
At first I thought of the hammer as just a symbol, not something that was physically a part of the actual environment. And that was a good thing because it gave the image a subcontext.
However, when I read the description it only felt over-pretentious. The position of the hammer isn't non-logical. It looks like a symbol rather than a floating hammer because of the exposure and the lack of background.
The image would be more surreal if you removed the description. It's a really nice concept.
π: 0 β©: 1
Talescaper In reply to linecut [2007-02-26 19:19:37 +0000 UTC]
Well you are right on some points. First of all, I prefer the image to be completely void of a background, to keep the main attention to the subjects at hand, which is also why I overexposed it, removing anything that could distract from the matter at hand.
Secondly, you can still consider the hammer to be a mere symbol. I actually find it one of the better interpretations I have seen here. The description does not remove the possibility that the hammer is not physically there, after all, it's less logical to smash a mirror with the symbol of a hammer than a real hammer. I am glad you did not need the description to understand that. I added the lengthy description because people 'didn't get it', but I suppose since you were able to make your own hypothesis about it, I can understand why you would find the description to be... redundant. Thank you for the comment.
π: 0 β©: 0
joker-vincent-tailor [2006-10-21 11:47:23 +0000 UTC]
lol i thought eh was smiling, made it seem slightly psychotic...its a very nice peice and idea ^_^
i like the hammer on the side... amkes me think of the wall...
π: 0 β©: 1
gromyko [2006-09-27 13:55:23 +0000 UTC]
a purely surreal masterpiece...Man Ray would be proud should he see this!! Youre highly impressive!! The surreal philosophy relies much on the incongrous positioning of unrelated, unorthodox objects...especially veristic surrealism, which is the representational branch of surrealism...you did a great job here...I salute you..
π: 0 β©: 1
Talescaper In reply to gromyko [2006-09-27 15:17:50 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot. I especially appreciate the reference to Man Ray. Magritte's The Pleasure Principle is one of my favourite paintings and might have influenced me here. The painting is apparently based on a photograph by Man Ray.
I was wondering if I should put this in *the-surreal-arts gallery. You just convinced me.
π: 0 β©: 1
gromyko In reply to Talescaper [2006-09-28 02:03:50 +0000 UTC]
you should...take my word for it...we'll love to see it there!!
π: 0 β©: 1
gromyko In reply to Talescaper [2006-09-28 13:12:59 +0000 UTC]
and the most open minded...lol...glad to be acquainted to all of you great people!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
mloes [2006-09-14 20:10:21 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! I loooove the concept... Great picture.
π: 0 β©: 0
MeatHookSodomy [2006-07-28 13:52:49 +0000 UTC]
great concept ...it makes you think ...great shot !!!
π: 0 β©: 0
shimaspawn [2006-05-24 05:53:12 +0000 UTC]
Very interesting. I also like the almost longing look the man give to the mirror. Nice work.
π: 0 β©: 0
Talescaper In reply to im-fine-again [2006-05-23 13:01:11 +0000 UTC]
No there's not!
Ceci n'est pas un marteau.
π: 0 β©: 0
AlexJHH [2006-05-22 06:55:41 +0000 UTC]
Great juxtaposition of expectations, I like it!
π: 0 β©: 1
Talescaper In reply to AlexJHH [2006-05-22 10:08:57 +0000 UTC]
Juxtaposition of expectations. That's a good one. I actually believe Magritte said something about that as well.
π: 0 β©: 1
AlexJHH In reply to Talescaper [2006-05-22 11:51:20 +0000 UTC]
Sorry, I didn't read all the comments ^_^
π: 0 β©: 1
AlexJHH In reply to Talescaper [2006-05-22 11:56:20 +0000 UTC]
How did you get the camera there? Did you put it in afterward?
π: 0 β©: 1
Talescaper In reply to AlexJHH [2006-05-22 15:09:11 +0000 UTC]
Funny how the collective subconscious works. One of the inspirations for this photo was a quote from a filmmaker, who said 'Art is a hammer, not a mirror'. So the camera could be a hammer too. Very interesting.
Either way, the hammer was hanging from the ceiling on a piece of string.
π: 0 β©: 1
AlexJHH In reply to Talescaper [2006-05-22 16:05:08 +0000 UTC]
Cool coincidence ^_^
π: 0 β©: 0
grasshopper87 [2006-04-27 22:10:35 +0000 UTC]
Oooh! very nice!
π: 0 β©: 0
Digital-Maze [2006-04-14 16:22:21 +0000 UTC]
Ops...
*I like the contrast
π: 0 β©: 1
Digital-Maze [2006-04-14 16:21:46 +0000 UTC]
Good Capture!
Like The Contrast!
π: 0 β©: 0
violetice [2006-04-14 03:37:38 +0000 UTC]
Interesting how reading a description can alter the view of an image...beforehand, I didn't like the hammer there at all, it was too out of place and compositionally it really bothered me. What's it doing there, anyway? But after reading the description, it still seems compositionally out of place, but yet it makes more sense there, because we don't expect it to be there, and yet....what am I talking about? You totally have me rambling. Ha.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>